WLFI and Justin Sun Clash Over Token Freeze as Lawsuit Details Emerge

TLDR

• WLFI says Blue Anthem signed an agreement giving it freeze rights.
• The filing alleges $300 million USDT moved to Binance before launch.
• WLFI claims short interest rose after the token opened for trading.
• Blue Anthem wallets were frozen after alleged agreement breaches.
• The dispute centers on unlock rights, wallet control, and trading conduct.

World Liberty Financial and Justin Sun are locked in a legal fight over frozen WLFI tokens. Court filings say Blue Anthem agreed to freeze terms before launch, while the dispute now centers on alleged Binance transfers, short activity, and wallet control. The case has drawn market attention as both sides face scrutiny over the token unlock agreement and post-launch trading.

Token Unlock Agreement Becomes Core Issue

The dispute centers on a Token Unlock Agreement signed before the WLFI launch. According to the filing, Justin Sun signed the agreement on behalf of Blue Anthem. WLFI says the document gave it “sole discretion” over token unlock requests.

The filing states that WLFI could deny unlocks, restrict access, or freeze wallets when required. It also says Blue Anthem agreed not to short WLFI. These clauses now sit at the center of the legal fight.

WLFI argues that the freeze was tied to the signed agreement. The company says the action was not random and followed alleged breaches. Sun’s side has challenged the freeze and raised concerns over access to tokens.

Filing Alleges Binance Transfers Before Launch

The complaint claims large USDT transfers were made before WLFI began trading. It alleges that more than $300 million USDT moved to Binance on August 31, 2025. The filing links these transfers to a wallet described as HTX 48. 

According to the complaint, the transfers occurred between 11:17 and 15:35 UTC. The filing says three transfers went to the same Binance deposit address.  WLFI claims the wallet was tied to Justin Sun through prior public statements about Huobi recovery wallets. The lawsuit also cites trading activity after the WLFI launch on September 1, 2025. It says WLFI fell 26% shortly after trading opened. 

It also claims open short interest rose 23% during the same period. WLFI says this activity raised concerns about possible short-selling. The company argues that those actions would conflict with prior commitments. The filing presents these claims as part of its reason for freezing Blue Anthem wallets.

WLFI Says Freeze Followed Alleged Breaches

WLFI claims several contract violations triggered the freeze process. The filing alleges about $9 million in WLFI moved directly to Binance. It says such transfers were barred under the agreement. The complaint also alleges that Blue Anthem held WLFI for undisclosed third parties. WLFI says this violated disclosure duties under the deal. 

It also claims short-selling activity breached the agreement’s trading restrictions. WLFI says the freeze was limited in scope. According to the filing, this was the only wallet frozen outside suspected illegal activity or compromised wallet cases. That claim is now part of WLFI’s legal defense. The lawsuit places the focus on contract language and wallet activity. 

Sun’s position centers on the freeze and control over locked tokens. The court will need to review the agreement, the transfers, and the trading evidence. For now, the case remains a legal clash over whether WLFI acted within its contract rights. It also raises questions about locked token deals and exchange-linked trading activity. The dispute is likely to remain closely watched by WLFI holders and the wider crypto market.

The post WLFI and Justin Sun Clash Over Token Freeze as Lawsuit Details Emerge  appeared first on CoinCentral.