TLDR MegaETH will refund all funds from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge following operational failures during launch A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed deposits to reopen 34 minutes early, pushing total deposits past $400 million Technical issues included a wrong contract parameter, strict KYC rate limits, and loss of control over transaction timing The refund contract is [...] The post MegaETH Refunds All Pre-Deposit Funds After USDm Launch Failures appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR MegaETH will refund all funds from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge following operational failures during launch A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed deposits to reopen 34 minutes early, pushing total deposits past $400 million Technical issues included a wrong contract parameter, strict KYC rate limits, and loss of control over transaction timing The refund contract is [...] The post MegaETH Refunds All Pre-Deposit Funds After USDm Launch Failures appeared first on Blockonomi.

MegaETH Refunds All Pre-Deposit Funds After USDm Launch Failures

TLDR

  • MegaETH will refund all funds from its USDm Pre-Deposit Bridge following operational failures during launch
  • A misconfigured multisig transaction allowed deposits to reopen 34 minutes early, pushing total deposits past $400 million
  • Technical issues included a wrong contract parameter, strict KYC rate limits, and loss of control over transaction timing
  • The refund contract is currently under audit with repayments starting after review completion
  • MegaETH plans to reopen a new USDC-USDm conversion bridge before its Frontier mainnet beta launch

MegaETH announced on Thursday it will refund all user deposits from its Pre-Deposit Bridge for USDm, the network’s planned stablecoin. The Ethereum Layer-2 project admitted to multiple operational failures during the launch process.

The team opened pre-deposits on Tuesday with a $250 million cap. Problems started immediately when the deposit contract contained an incorrect SaleUUID that required a multisig update to fix.

At the same time, Sonar, the KYC provider handling identity verification, applied unexpected rate limits that blocked most user traffic. The team took over 20 minutes to identify and resolve the problem.

When deposits reopened at a randomized time, users who were actively refreshing the page filled the entire $250 million cap within minutes. Many users who relied on official announcements were unable to participate.

MegaETH then decided to raise the cap to $1 billion. During this process, the team misconfigured a multisignature transaction that controls contract parameters.

The transaction was incorrectly set to require all four signatures instead of three out of four. This error allowed an external party to execute the queued transaction roughly 34 minutes before the planned reopening time.

Early Execution Causes Chaos

Deposits resumed earlier than scheduled because Safe multisig transactions can be executed by anyone once required signatures are met. The team lost control of the timing completely.

Total deposits quickly surpassed $400 million as the early opening caught the team off guard. MegaETH tried to limit damage by reducing the cap to $400 million, but transaction confirmation delays meant deposits kept flowing in.

A second attempt to set the cap at $500 million also failed. By that point, MegaETH suspended the entire process and scrapped plans to expand the limit to $1 billion.

The team cited unresolved bugs in the KYC flow as an additional reason for halting operations. In their announcement, MegaETH acknowledged the execution was “sloppy” and that expectations were not aligned with their internal goals.

Refund Process and Future Plans

All deposits will be returned through a new smart contract currently under audit. MegaETH stated that no funds were ever at risk during the incidents.

The team said depositor contributions will be recognized later but did not provide specific details. A new USDC-USDm conversion bridge will open before the Frontier mainnet beta launch.

MegaETH describes itself as an Ethereum Layer-2 network focused on transaction speed and low costs. The project claims theoretical capacity of up to 100,000 transactions per second with fees below $0.01.

Ethereum currently processes about 30 transactions per second. MegaETH uses a proof-of-stake model with performance-based staking rewards.

Token holders who stake MEGA will participate in governance through a decentralized autonomous organization. Both the DAO and full staking framework are expected to launch 12 to 18 months after mainnet goes live.

The refund process will begin after the audit of the new contract is completed. MegaETH plans to establish stable liquidity before attempting a wider rollout of its network.

The post MegaETH Refunds All Pre-Deposit Funds After USDm Launch Failures appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
USD Mapped Token Logo
USD Mapped Token Price(USDM)
$0.9901
$0.9901$0.9901
-0.21%
USD
USD Mapped Token (USDM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49