Most projects we see here are *totally useless* and won't exist for more than a few months. Most will be abandoned in 3 weeks when the founder realizes nobody wants to pay for their "revolutionary" todo app with AI. "AI-Powered" means nothing anymore.Most projects we see here are *totally useless* and won't exist for more than a few months. Most will be abandoned in 3 weeks when the founder realizes nobody wants to pay for their "revolutionary" todo app with AI. "AI-Powered" means nothing anymore.

Stop Building "AI-Powered" Sh*t. The SaaS Gold Rush is a Trap

"Check out my SaaS directory list" - nobody cares

"I Hit 10k MRR in 30 Days: Here's How" - stop lying

"I created an AI-powered chatbot" - no, you wrapped OpenAI's API

"Built my MVP in 48 hours with Cursor" - congrats, so did 50,000 other people this week

Most projects we see here are totally useless and won't exist for more than a few months. Actually, scratch that and most will be abandoned in 3 weeks when the founder realizes nobody wants to pay for their "revolutionary" todo app with AI.

And the culprit is you

Yes, you, who thought you'd get rich by:

  • Watching a 47-minute YouTube video titled "I Built a $10k/month SaaS with AI (You Can Too!)"
  • Spending 6 hours "coding" in Cursor (you mean prompting)
  • Slapping together NextJS + Supabase + PostgreSQL + Vercel
  • Adding "AI-Powered" to your landing page (it's literally just a ChatGPT wrapper)
  • Posting on 47 Reddit communities asking for "feedback" (begging for users)
  • Getting 3 signups (your mom, your best friend, and a bot)
  • Wondering why you're not a millionaire yet

Just because AI tools like Cursor, v0, and ChatGPT can help you code faster doesn't mean every AI-generated SaaS needs to exist.

We've seen this movie before

Remember when everyone was:

  • Launching crypto tokens → "This will revolutionize payments!" (Rugpulled in 6 months)
  • Minting NFTs → "Digital art is the future!" (Floor price: $0)
  • Dropshipping fidget spinners → "Passive income!" (Banned by Shopify)
  • Creating courses → "Share your expertise!" (12 sales, all refunded)
  • Starting agencies → "I'll manage your social media!" (Client ghosted after 2 weeks)

And now: Building AI SaaS → "Cursor will make me rich!" (0 MRR after 4 months)

Different costumes, same empty promises.

The harsh truth nobody tells you

1. Your SaaS isn't special

There are 47,000+ SaaS products launched every year. Most die within 12 months.

Why? Because you didn't solve a problem but you created a solution looking for a problem.

Nobody wakes up thinking: "Man, I really wish there was an AI-powered calendar that summarizes my meetings and sends me a haiku about my productivity."

2. "AI-Powered" means nothing anymore

Every SaaS now has "AI" slapped on it:

  • AI project management (it's Trello with GPT)
  • AI email assistant (Gmail + OpenAI API)
  • AI note-taking (Notion clone with embeddings)
  • AI analytics (charts + ChatGPT summaries)

Customers don't care about AI. They care about solving their problem faster, cheaper, or better.

If your only differentiator is "we added AI," you have no differentiator.

3. Tech stack doesn't matter (yet you obsess over it)

You spend 40 hours debating:

  • "Should I use NextJS or Remix?"
  • "Supabase or Firebase?"
  • "TailwindCSS or Chakra UI?"
  • "Vercel or Netlify?"

Nobody gives a shit.

Your customers don't care if you built it in NextJS, PHP, or hand-coded assembly. They care if it solves their problem.

Dropbox's MVP was a video. Airbnb's MVP was Craigslist + a camera. Stripe's first version couldn't even handle edge cases.

Stop optimizing your tech stack. Start talking to customers.

4. You're not a founder. You're a code monkey with delusions

Real founders:

  • Spend 80% of time talking to customers
  • Understand sales, marketing, distribution
  • Obsess over problem-solution fit
  • Build in public and iterate based on feedback
  • Know their numbers (CAC, LTV, churn, MRR)

Fake founders:

  • Spend 80% of time "perfecting" the product
  • Think "if I build it, they will come"
  • Launch on Product Hunt and wonder why nobody cares
  • Have zero customers but "plan to monetize later"
  • Refuse to do sales because "I'm technical, not a salesperson"

If you can't sell, you can't build a business. Period.

5. The only people making money are selling you the dream

That YouTuber with "How I Built a $50k/month SaaS"?

  • Their SaaS makes $2k/month
  • Their course about building SaaS makes $48k/month

That "indie hacker" with a Twitter following?

  • Their product makes $5k/month
  • Their paid community/newsletter makes $30k/month

That "AI automation agency" guy?

  • His agency has 2 clients
  • His "agency blueprint" course has 847 students at $297 each

They're not experts. They're salespeople. And they're good at one thing: making you believe you're just one AI prompt, one tech stack, one "secret framework" away from financial freedom.

You're not.

What we actually need to do (the uncomfortable truth):

1. Stop building. Start validating

Before you write a single line of code:

  • Talk to 50 potential customers
  • Ask: "What's your biggest pain point with [X]?"
  • Ask: "How do you currently solve this?"
  • Ask: "Would you pay $[price] to solve this?"
  • If 30+ say "yes," you might have something

If you can't find 50 people to talk to, you don't understand your market.

2. Solve problems you've personally experienced

The best SaaS founders build solutions to their own problems:

  • Notion → Frustrated with clunky wikis
  • Superhuman → Email was too slow
  • Linear → Jira was a nightmare
  • Figma → Design tools were desktop-only

What problem are you so frustrated with that you'd build a solution even if nobody paid you?

If your answer is "I saw a gap in the market," you're already wrong.

3. Build expertise, not MVPs

Stop launching half-baked products every month. Start building deep expertise in one domain.

Spend 6-12 months:

  • Learning everything about a specific industry
  • Talking to practitioners daily
  • Understanding workflows, pain points, budgets
  • Building a reputation as someone who "gets it"

Then build a solution.

4. Learn sales first, code second

Controversial take: You don't need to code to build a SaaS.

You need to:

  • Identify a painful problem
  • Sell the solution before it exists
  • Hire developers to build it
  • Sell more, iterate, scale

If you're "technical" but can't sell, you're not a founder then you're an engineer looking for a co-founder who'll do the hard part.

Learn sales. Learn copywriting. Learn positioning. Then worry about your tech stack.

5. Build for purpose, not profit (initially)

If your only goal is "make money," you'll quit the moment it gets hard.

The best founders are obsessed with the problem:

  • They'd work on it even without pay
  • They can talk about it for hours
  • They have strong opinions about the industry
  • They've been thinking about this for years

If you're just chasing "passive income," go buy index funds.

Take a breath and ask yourself:

  • What am I genuinely world-class at? (Not "pretty good"—world-class)
  • What problems do I understand better than 99% of people?
  • What could I talk about for 3 hours without notes?
  • What industry do I have insider knowledge about?
  • What would I build even if I knew it would never make money?

If you can't answer these, you're not ready to build a SaaS. You're ready to learn, research, and gain experience.

Let's stop the madness

Stop building:

  • Another AI chatbot
  • Another project management tool "with AI"
  • Another no-code directory
  • Another "Notion alternative"
  • Another Chrome extension that "boosts productivity"

Start building:

  • Deep expertise in a specific domain
  • Relationships with potential customers
  • Sales and marketing skills
  • Financial literacy (understand unit economics)
  • Resilience (because 99% of startups fail)

A brutal reality check

🔴 95% of SaaS products fail

🔴 Only 1% reach $1M ARR

🔴 40% of startups fail due to no market need

🔴 Average time to profitability: 3-5 years(not 30 days)

🔴Most "successful" indie hackers have 5+ failed products behind them

Still want to build a SaaS? Good.

But do it for the right reasons:

  • Because you're obsessed with solving a specific problem
  • Because you have unique insights others don't
  • Because you're willing to spend years learning and iterating
  • Because you understand that coding is 10% of the work

Not because some YouTuber said you could get rich quick with Cursor and NextJS.

Final thoughts:

I'm not saying don't use AI tools. I'm not saying don't build products.

I'm saying: Stop building thoughtless garbage that adds zero value to the world.

If your elevator pitch is "It's like [successful product] but with AI," you don't have a business. You have a copycat with a ChatGPT API key.

If you can't explain why your product needs to exist in one sentence without mentioning "AI," "ML," or "automation," you haven't found product-market fit.

And if your go-to-market strategy is "post on Reddit and hope," you're not serious about building a business.

Build less. Think more. Sell first. Code last.

That's the formula. Everything else is noise.

TL;DR:

  • Stop building AI-powered clones with Cursor
  • Tech stack doesn't matter if you have no customers
  • The only people making money are selling courses
  • Learn sales before you learn to code
  • Solve problems you deeply understand
  • Build expertise, not MVPs
  • 95% of SaaS products fail so don't be a statistic

Now go delete your "revolutionary AI SaaS" and start talking to real humans about real problems.

Or don't. Your choice. Just don't complain when your "10k MRR in 30 days" turns into "$0 MRR after 6 months."

\

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01723
$0.01723$0.01723
-0.11%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00