A brief guide on the various available solutions and the differences that distinguish themA brief guide on the various available solutions and the differences that distinguish them

How to Stake ETH

Since September 2022, Ethereum has been a blockchain based on Proof-of-Stake. 

This means it natively supports staking of ETH, since it is precisely thanks to staked ETH that validator nodes can validate transactions. 

However, there are different ways to stake your ETH, especially since the primary method is not truly accessible to everyone. 

The Primary Technique

The primary technique for staking ETH would be to set up your own validator node. 

However, this technique involves a couple of “issues” (although they shouldn’t really be defined as such) that effectively prevent the vast majority of people from being able to use it. 

The first challenge is precisely installing, configuring, and correctly operating an Ethereum validator node. This is indeed a process that requires specific technical skills that only a few actually possess. 


For those lacking such expertise, it is not recommended to proceed in this manner. 

The second issue is that to stake ETH on your own validator node, you need at least 32 ETH, which as of today would have a value of approximately $95,000. 

These are amounts absolutely unavailable to most, especially on Ethereum. 

Additionally, ETH staked on a validator node are illiquid, meaning they are locked without the possibility of being used otherwise. 

Finally, appropriate hardware and specific software are also required, and the node must operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

The advantage, however, would be not only to use the primary technique for staking ETH, but also the only one that allows for complete and absolute control over the entire process.  

For those who wish to proceed in this manner, an official guide and the so-called Staking Launchpad have been published on ethereum.org for easier installation and configuration.

Other Decentralized Solutions

The self-owned validator node is the quintessential decentralized solution, but there are also other decentralized and accessible options for staking ETH available to everyone. 

Decentralized options are those that allow the user to maintain control of the funds themselves (they are non-custodial solutions). Additionally, they often involve the issuance of liquid tokens that represent the ETH staked, which in turn can be used in DeFi, effectively making the ETH locked in staking liquid.

The world’s leading platform accessible to everyone for decentralized ETH staking is Lido.

First of all, it is possible to stake any amount of ETH, even significantly less than the aforementioned 32 ETH. 

Additionally, you receive as many stETH (Lido’s liquid token) as the amount of ETH you lock in staking, allowing you to freely use the stETH tokens as you wish. 

The APY is approximately 3%, or slightly more, and it is a fairly straightforward solution to use. 

However, being a slightly less decentralized solution than the previous one, it carries a bit more risk. 

The first is that ETH must be locked in a smart contract created by others. Although to date Lido’s smart contract has never caused any issues, there is an additional small risk. This risk further increases if other less tested platforms are used. 

It should also be added that Lido controls nearly 30% of all ETH currently staked worldwide, and this raises some concerns, also expressed by Vitalik Buterin.

The fees are 10%.

Other similar platforms include Rocket Pool, StakeWise, and Frax Ether. 

Centralized Solutions

Centralized solutions are by far the easiest to use, but theoretically, they are also the most risky to utilize. 

To be honest, less tested decentralized solutions turn out to be significantly riskier than the main centralized solutions, which are now widely tested. However, on a theoretical level, decentralized solutions (i.e., non-custodial) still have one less risk, precisely due to the absence of an external custodian of the funds. 

It should be noted, however, that there is an additional risk inherent in non-custodial solutions, namely the risk of not properly storing the seed and the private keys of the wallet. 

Many well-known centralized exchanges offer a staking service for ETH.

Using it is very simple: once you find the page on their site specifically dedicated to this service, just send your ETH to the service itself, after ensuring you have enough in your account’s wallet. 

However, the APY can sometimes be lower, so it’s advisable to check each exchange to see what returns they promise. It’s also wise to check the fees, which vary from exchange to exchange. 

Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, and many other exchanges support ETH staking. 

Key Differences

The main difference between centralized and decentralized solutions is that the latter are non-custodial, meaning they allow the user to retain control over their funds. 

In the case of a validating node, control is absolute; in the case of platforms like Lido, the true custodian is the smart contract, but if there are no issues, control remains solely in the hands of the user. 

Another difference is related to liquidity. In fact, by using decentralized solutions like Lido, one achieves high liquidity thanks to liquid tokens. On the other hand, with centralized solutions, this is not always possible. 

There are also differences in terms of returns, but these differences vary greatly from solution to solution because there are also centralized solutions with returns similar to those of decentralized solutions.

Finally, the last difference to mention, which for many users is actually the main one, is related to ease of use. Centralized solutions are indeed extremely simple, whereas decentralized ones always present at least a minimal additional difficulty.

Market Opportunity
Ethereum Logo
Ethereum Price(ETH)
$2,968.44
$2,968.44$2,968.44
+0.08%
USD
Ethereum (ETH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00