Bitcoin supply loss climbs to 6.7M BTC, signaling mounting stress as on-chain metrics point to a deeper bearish phase and thresholds.Bitcoin supply loss climbs to 6.7M BTC, signaling mounting stress as on-chain metrics point to a deeper bearish phase and thresholds.

Rising bitcoin supply loss signals deepening bearish phase in BTC market

bitcoin supply loss

Recent on-chain data highlights growing stress across the Bitcoin market, with bitcoin supply loss metrics flashing levels typical of bearish cycle transitions.

Glassnode data shows record loss-bearing supply in current cycle

On-chain analytics firm Glassnode reports that the Bitcoin supply currently sitting at a loss has climbed to 6.7 million BTC, the highest level of loss-bearing supply in this cycle. This spike comes as the BTC price trades below the key psychological level of $90,000 after a sharp crash that began last month.

According to Glassnode, this 6.7 million BTC pool represents 23.7% of the circulating supply now underwater. Moreover, the report breaks this down between investor cohorts: 10.2% is held by long term holders, while 13.5% belongs to short term holders. That said, these figures underline how both recent buyers and more established investors are exposed to unrealized losses.

Glassnode argues that this distribution mirrors previous cycle transitions into deeper bearish regimes. However, the firm notes that coins recently acquired at higher prices are gradually aging into the long-term investor cohort, suggesting that many participants are choosing to hold through drawdowns rather than capitulate immediately.

Investor frustration echoes prior cycle transition phases

The analytics platform highlights that the 67 million BTC range of coins at a loss, in place since mid-November, resembles early transitional phases of earlier cycles. In those periods, mounting investor frustration tended to precede a shift into more pronounced bearish conditions and heavier capitulation at lower Bitcoin prices.

Notably, the Bitcoin price has fallen back to levels last seen in 2024, effectively erasing its year-to-date gains. Moreover, Glassnode notes that this decline has left behind a dense supply cluster accumulated by top buyers between $93,000 and $120,000. This overhead supply could weigh on any relief rally.

The resulting supply profile signals a top-heavy market structure. Glassnode explains that recovery attempts are likely to meet strong selling pressure from previously trapped buyers in that price band, particularly in the early stages of a bearish phase when confidence remains fragile.

Key on-chain thresholds and risk of further downside

Glassnode stresses that as long as the Bitcoin price trades below the $93,000 3,120,000 range, the market will struggle to convert resistance into support. Furthermore, the firm highlights one crucial on-chain threshold: the Short-Term Holder Cost Basis, currently estimated at $101,500. This level reflects the average cost basis of recent buyers.

In Glassnode’s view, if BTC fails to reclaim this $101,500 threshold, the risk of additional corrective downside remains elevated. However, a decisive move back above that level could ease selling pressure from short-term market participants and signal a more constructive phase.

Against this backdrop, analysts are watching the evolution of bitcoin supply loss as a gauge of investor stress and potential capitulation. Historically, extreme readings in coins held at a loss have often coincided with later stages of bearish cycles, though timing inflection points remains challenging.

Spot market flows reveal uneven demand across exchanges

Beyond supply metrics, Glassnode examines spot market behavior using cumulative volume delta (CVD) across major trading venues. The firm observes periodic bursts of buy-side activity in spot flows, yet these have not developed into sustained accumulation, particularly during recent BTC price pullbacks.

The analytics provider notes that the Coinbase spot flows CVD remains relatively constructive, signaling steadier participation from US-based investors. However, conditions differ elsewhere: Glassnode highlights that Binance and aggregate bitcoin flow analysis show choppy, largely directionless behavior, hinting at uncertainty among global traders.

These dispersion points, according to Glassnode, reflect selective engagement rather than broad, coordinated spot demand. Moreover, they underscore how the current market environment lacks the kind of synchronized buying pressure usually seen during strong uptrends.

Derivatives and liquidity drive price action as spot demand lags

Glassnode also points out that the recent Bitcoin price declines have not triggered a decisive expansion in positive CVD across exchanges. This suggests that dip-buying remains tactical and short-lived, rather than signaling a durable shift toward accumulation.

In the absence of robust spot demand across all venues, Bitcoin‘s price action is increasingly reliant on derivatives activity and broader liquidity conditions. That said, any revival in spot accumulation could quickly change market dynamics by absorbing sell pressure from loss-making holders.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $86,800, according to CoinMarketCap. The asset is up over the last 24 hours, yet remains well below the dense supply cluster created between $93,000 and $120,000, keeping investor focus firmly on loss metrics and on-chain support levels.

In summary, rising coins held at a loss, top-heavy supply between $93,000 and $120,000, and uneven spot flows across platforms paint a cautious outlook, with further downside risk persisting unless BTC can reclaim key on-chain thresholds.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$87,207.28
$87,207.28$87,207.28
-0.86%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00