Anonymous trader loses $50M USDT in crypto scam, offers $1M for asset return.Anonymous trader loses $50M USDT in crypto scam, offers $1M for asset return.

Crypto Trader Loses $50 Million in Address Scam

What to Know:
  • Crypto trader suffers $50 million loss in an address scam.
  • Victim offers $1 million for asset recovery.
  • USDT converted to ETH, sent through Tornado Cash.

An anonymous crypto trader fell victim to an address poisoning attack, losing nearly $50 million in USDT, prompting a $1 million bounty for its safe return.

This incident underscores the vulnerability of digital assets to sophisticated scams, raising concerns about security in cryptocurrency markets amid rising thefts and demands for improved protective measures.

A cryptocurrency trader lost $49,999,950 USDT in an address poisoning scam and is offering a $1 million bounty for its return.

The incident highlights vulnerabilities in wallet security and has prompted concern within the crypto community about similar attacks.

Trader Scammed $50M: USDT to ETH via Tornado Cash

The trader was victimized by an address poisoning attack, a method where a scammer mimics wallet address characters. USDT was then converted into 16,680 ETH and sent through Tornado Cash.

An unidentified cryptocurrency trader offered a $1 million incentive for the stolen assets’ return. Legal action is threatened if the stolen funds are not returned imminently.

Global Alarm: Wallet Security Under Scrutiny

The incident has caused alarm for crypto users globally, fearing potential vulnerabilities in wallet transactions. Conversion of USDT to ETH highlights the lack of secure protocols.

The offer of a white-hat bounty reflects desperation to recover funds. It underscores the potential financial implications such attacks have on traders and the industry.

Address Poisoning Echoes Old Phishing Tactics

Address poisoning is akin to earlier phishing tactics in the digital realm, highlighting a persistent challenge in crypto security. Such incidents can erode trust in decentralized finance protocols.

Based on previous trends, swift action and heightened security measures are crucial. Experts predict increased awareness and preventive measures being adopted by crypto platforms.

Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile, and investing involves risk. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.000832
$0.000832$0.000832
-1.07%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14