The post Super Bowl ad prediction market contracts raise insider trading worry appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A detail view of the Super Bowl LX logo on aThe post Super Bowl ad prediction market contracts raise insider trading worry appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A detail view of the Super Bowl LX logo on a

Super Bowl ad prediction market contracts raise insider trading worry

A detail view of the Super Bowl LX logo on a Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) light rail car on December 29, 2025 in Santa Clara, California.

Aaron M. Sprecher | Getty Images Sport | Getty Images

A version of this article first appeared in the CNBC Sport newsletter with Alex Sherman, which brings you the biggest news and exclusive interviews from the worlds of sports business and media. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

For many Americans, the best part of the Super Bowl is the commercials. This year, you can make — or lose — money on them, too.

Prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket currently have contracts open on which companies will run ads during Super Bowl 60, set for Feb. 8 in Santa Clara, California. Users can trade on if Salesforce or Verizon or Coca-Cola will have a Super Bowl spot this year, for example.

While Polymarket’s trades are just a “Yes/No” bet, Kalshi has a few predictions that are a bit more nuanced, such as, “Who will appear in a big game ad before Feb 9, 2026?”, with trades available for Sydney Sweeney, Timothée Chalamet and Harry Styles. 

It’s a new wrinkle for the advertising industry’s biggest night. The price of Super Bowl commercials goes higher and higher each year as the Super Bowl’s TV audience keeps rising. Last year’s game was watched by 127.7 million viewers, a record high. That game, broadcast by Fox, generated about $7.5 million per 30-second spot, with 10 or so ads commanding more than $8 million. 

This year, NBC has sold out all of its ad inventory averaging $8 million per 30-second commercial with between five and 10 ads selling for more than $10 million apiece, according to NBC Chairman of Global Advertising and Partnerships Mark Marshall. The closer to the game that a company buys an ad slot, the more it pays. 

According to Marshall, technology companies have bought the most spots across this year’s slate, though NBC defines technology relatively broadly. (Uber Eats, for example, is considered a tech company.) Only two automobile companies are advertising during the game. About 40% of advertisers this year have never bought a Super Bowl spot before, Marshall said.

But the entrance of prediction market platforms means Marshall has reason to keep details close to the vest.

Insider trading concerns

For those not familiar with how these prediction markets work, they basically trade like stocks, with contracts priced between $0 and $1. The contracts trade up or down depending on the action.

For example, for “Which brands will advertise during the big game 2026?” on Kalshi, Spotify spiked on Jan. 19, going from $0.35 to $0.69 before settling down. As of Friday morning, a “Yes” contract for Spotify was priced at $0.37.

If your predicted outcome materializes, you get paid, with winning contracts paying out $1 each, minus fees.

Both Polymarket and Kalshi are also offering other prediction trades around the Super Bowl, including “What songs will be played at the halftime show?,” “Who will attend the big game?” (Lionel Messi? Elon Musk?), and more traditional sportsbook “bets” such as “Seattle vs. New England: Most Rushing Yards.”

While straight sports predictions, such as rushing yards, are unknown events, there are likely hundreds, if not thousands, of employees that know if their company is planning to run a Super Bowl commercial. That makes some contracts ripe for insider trading.

Get the CNBC Sport newsletter directly to your inbox

The CNBC Sport newsletter with Alex Sherman brings you the biggest news and exclusive interviews from the worlds of sports business and media, delivered weekly to your inbox.

Subscribe here to get access today.

Existing laws prohibit insider trading on prediction markets, but industry experts are skeptical that a gutted Commodity Futures Trading Commission has the will or the staff to police those problems. 

Meanwhile the question of whether events contracts on sports amount to financial derivatives or gambling is dividing the sports gambling industry — and tying federal courts in knots.  

“A couple of courts have held that event contracts based on sports are not derivatives subject to the CFTC’s authority,” said Jack Murphy, senior counsel at Akin Gump and a former CFTC enforcement attorney. “Those decisions are up on appeal. If sports event contracts aren’t derivatives, then criminal authorities could still prosecute insider trading on prediction markets under a wire fraud theory.”

On Thursday, Michael Selig, the new chairman of the CFTC, said he had directed agency staff to withdraw a proposed rule that would ban prediction trades on sports and politics. He said new rules would be coming.

Meanwhile live sports continue to fuel prediction market growth. Kalshi’s on track for 44% month-over-month growth in total trading volume, according to Piper Sandler analyst Patrick Moley. The contract on “Who will win the Super Bowl?” – the Seattle Seahawks or the New England Patriots – has already accounted for more than $150 million in trading volume.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/30/super-bowl-ad-prediction-market-contracts.html

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

qLabs Fires First Shot in Quantum Crypto Race — Can Coinbase Catch Up?

The rapid progress of quantum computing is forcing the cryptocurrency industry to confront the problem that has long been treated as theoretical. Blockchains th
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/30 22:53
The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

The Anatomy of a Self-Made Billionaire’s Mindset: How Gurhan Kiziloz Reached a $1.7B Net Worth

There are many paths to wealth in the modern economy, but the one Gurhan Kiziloz took stands out for a simple reason: he built everything himself. By 2026, the
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 23:07
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28