Cardano’s 2026 budget results are in — and the numbers tell a clear story about where the community wants to invest. Following the completion of the Hydra Voting phase of the 2026 Cardano Budget Process, Intersect released a full audited report confirming participation metrics, vote validity, and the final support percentages for every proposal on the table.
Blockchain governance rarely gets this transparent. The Cardano Budget Process used the Hydra Voting mechanism — a layer-2 scaling solution repurposed here for secure, high-throughput governance — with Intersect acting as both facilitator and auditor of the process.
Intersect, the member-based organization responsible for stewarding Cardano’s open-source development, ran the Hydra Voting phase and subsequently conducted an independent audit to verify every aspect of the process. The audit covered voter eligibility verification, vote validity, participation metrics, and final proposal support calculations — giving the results a documented chain of accountability.
The fact that Intersect both facilitated the vote and conducted the audit is worth noting. No separate third-party auditor is mentioned in the report, which means the process relies on Intersect’s own methodological rigor rather than external verification.
Voting eligibility was determined at snapshot epoch 636. A total of 113 voters participated, of which 112 submitted valid votes and 1 was deemed invalid. No explanation for the invalid vote was provided in the audit materials.
The participation numbers are notable at the voting power level. Total DRep voting power registered at 6,008,653,786.69 ADA, of which 5,070,798,414.70 ADA represented valid participating voting power. Non-participating voting power came to 937,855,371.98 ADA, producing a final participation rate of 84.39% by voting power — a strong turnout for an on-chain governance event.
Every proposal that cleared the 67% minimum threshold was formally approved. The results skew heavily toward infrastructure maintenance and technical stewardship — reflecting community priorities around keeping Cardano’s core tooling funded and stable.
TxPipe came away as the standout recipient of community confidence. Pallas by TxPipe, covering the maintenance of Cardano’s core Rust libraries in its second year, received 85.67% support — the highest result of any individual proposal in this vote. Close behind, Dolos by TxPipe, which maintains Cardano’s lightweight data node, pulled 85.28%.
Two additional TxPipe proposals also cleared the threshold. UTxO RPC, maintaining Cardano’s integration standard in Year 2, received 85.08% support. Oura by TxPipe, which keeps Cardano’s event pipeline running, earned 73.57%. Tx3 by TxPipe, an open API layer for Cardano’s dApp protocols, received 75.63%. Taken together, TxPipe’s proposals dominated the approved list — a signal that the DRep community places significant trust in the organization’s technical track record.
Beyond TxPipe, several other proposals secured strong mandates. The Mithril Protocol — Cardano’s stake-based threshold signature scheme — received 81.33% support, reflecting its growing role in lightweight client infrastructure.
Intersect’s own proposal for Governance Coordination and Technical Stewardship for the Cardano Ecosystem passed with 80.91%. The Wirex proposal, which focuses on bringing real-world payment functionality to Cardano, achieved 78.93% — one of the stronger showings for a non-infrastructure proposal in the batch.
MLabs Core Tool Maintenance and Enhancement, covering Plutarch and Ply, earned 72.62%. Hardware Wallet Maintenance 2026 cleared the threshold at 71.33%, and the Intersect Technical Steering Committee Support proposal rounded out the approved list at 68.45%.
What’s analytically interesting here is the consistency of the results. No approved proposal slipped through narrowly — even the lowest-scoring approved item, at 68.45%, still cleared the bar with room to spare. That kind of margin suggests genuine consensus among the DRep voter base, not fragmented or contested decision-making.
The complete audit report documents the full methodology used to verify each stage of the process. This includes the voter eligibility verification process, participation calculations broken down by voting power, and the final proposal results drawn from audited Hydra voting data.
Making this level of detail publicly accessible matters for Cardano’s governance ambitions. The Cardano 2026 budget results represent one of the more data-rich governance outcomes the network has published, and the audit structure — however self-referential — at least provides a documented basis for scrutiny. As Cardano’s on-chain governance matures under the Voltaire framework, the methodological choices made in processes like this one will set expectations for how future budget rounds are run and verified.
The voting was conducted through the Hydra Voting phase, facilitated by Intersect. Voter eligibility was determined at snapshot epoch 636, and an independent audit was performed by Intersect to verify voter eligibility, vote validity, participation metrics, and proposal support calculations.
The participation rate by voting power was 84.39%. A total of 113 voters participated, with 112 submitting valid votes. Total DRep voting power was 6,008,653,786.69 ADA, of which 5,070,798,414.70 ADA represented valid participating voting power.
Pallas by TxPipe led with 85.67% support for maintaining Cardano’s core Rust libraries (Year 2), followed by Dolos by TxPipe at 85.28% for the lightweight data node, UTxO RPC by TxPipe at 85.08%, Mithril Protocol at 81.33%, and Intersect’s Governance Coordination proposal at 80.91%.
The audit report covers the full audit methodology, the voter eligibility verification process, participation calculations broken down by voting power, and the final proposal results based on the audited Hydra voting data.
Article produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by the editorial team.

