The post How One Trader Turned Panic Into $192M Profit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. How an anonymous wallet profited from the crypto chaos An anonymous wallet (0xb317) on the Hyperliquid derivatives exchange reportedly earned a $192-million profit within just a few hours during a period of sharp market volatility. As Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) prices fell sharply, many traders were hit with liquidations that erased more than $1 billion in leveraged positions. During the sell-off, one trader managed to time a short that paid off in a big way. Whether it was luck, timing or experience isn’t clear. The wallet’s timing, just minutes before a US tariff announcement that triggered the market drop, has fueled speculation about insider knowledge or market manipulation. The incident highlights the significant influence of high-leverage trading in decentralized finance (DeFi). It also reveals the complex reality of modern crypto markets, where anonymous large-scale traders can move billions and shape market sentiment with a single trade. How the US trade war news triggered massive crypto market liquidations The market meltdown began shortly after the US administration unexpectedly announced it would impose 100% tariffs on Chinese imports, which caught investors off guard. The news sent shockwaves through global markets. The tariff announcement slashed stock prices, caused sharp swings in derivatives and pushed cryptocurrencies into a steep decline. Within hours, Bitcoin’s value fell sharply, triggering widespread liquidations across exchanges. Still, vulnerabilities in the crypto market had been building well before the tariff news broke. The perpetual futures market was overloaded with open interest and excessive leverage, creating a delicate situation where even a small shock could trigger a wave of margin calls. In this context, Hyperliquid, a decentralized derivatives platform, stood out. Unlike centralized exchanges (CEXs) with tighter controls, Hyperliquid’s open structure made it a preferred venue for bold, high-stakes trades by major traders. Did you know? Some traders short crypto… The post How One Trader Turned Panic Into $192M Profit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. How an anonymous wallet profited from the crypto chaos An anonymous wallet (0xb317) on the Hyperliquid derivatives exchange reportedly earned a $192-million profit within just a few hours during a period of sharp market volatility. As Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) prices fell sharply, many traders were hit with liquidations that erased more than $1 billion in leveraged positions. During the sell-off, one trader managed to time a short that paid off in a big way. Whether it was luck, timing or experience isn’t clear. The wallet’s timing, just minutes before a US tariff announcement that triggered the market drop, has fueled speculation about insider knowledge or market manipulation. The incident highlights the significant influence of high-leverage trading in decentralized finance (DeFi). It also reveals the complex reality of modern crypto markets, where anonymous large-scale traders can move billions and shape market sentiment with a single trade. How the US trade war news triggered massive crypto market liquidations The market meltdown began shortly after the US administration unexpectedly announced it would impose 100% tariffs on Chinese imports, which caught investors off guard. The news sent shockwaves through global markets. The tariff announcement slashed stock prices, caused sharp swings in derivatives and pushed cryptocurrencies into a steep decline. Within hours, Bitcoin’s value fell sharply, triggering widespread liquidations across exchanges. Still, vulnerabilities in the crypto market had been building well before the tariff news broke. The perpetual futures market was overloaded with open interest and excessive leverage, creating a delicate situation where even a small shock could trigger a wave of margin calls. In this context, Hyperliquid, a decentralized derivatives platform, stood out. Unlike centralized exchanges (CEXs) with tighter controls, Hyperliquid’s open structure made it a preferred venue for bold, high-stakes trades by major traders. Did you know? Some traders short crypto…

How One Trader Turned Panic Into $192M Profit

How an anonymous wallet profited from the crypto chaos

An anonymous wallet (0xb317) on the Hyperliquid derivatives exchange reportedly earned a $192-million profit within just a few hours during a period of sharp market volatility.

As Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) prices fell sharply, many traders were hit with liquidations that erased more than $1 billion in leveraged positions. During the sell-off, one trader managed to time a short that paid off in a big way. Whether it was luck, timing or experience isn’t clear.

The wallet’s timing, just minutes before a US tariff announcement that triggered the market drop, has fueled speculation about insider knowledge or market manipulation. The incident highlights the significant influence of high-leverage trading in decentralized finance (DeFi). It also reveals the complex reality of modern crypto markets, where anonymous large-scale traders can move billions and shape market sentiment with a single trade.

How the US trade war news triggered massive crypto market liquidations

The market meltdown began shortly after the US administration unexpectedly announced it would impose 100% tariffs on Chinese imports, which caught investors off guard. The news sent shockwaves through global markets.

The tariff announcement slashed stock prices, caused sharp swings in derivatives and pushed cryptocurrencies into a steep decline. Within hours, Bitcoin’s value fell sharply, triggering widespread liquidations across exchanges. Still, vulnerabilities in the crypto market had been building well before the tariff news broke.

The perpetual futures market was overloaded with open interest and excessive leverage, creating a delicate situation where even a small shock could trigger a wave of margin calls.

In this context, Hyperliquid, a decentralized derivatives platform, stood out. Unlike centralized exchanges (CEXs) with tighter controls, Hyperliquid’s open structure made it a preferred venue for bold, high-stakes trades by major traders.

Did you know? Some traders short crypto to hedge their long-term holdings. By betting against price dips, they can protect profits during volatile periods. It’s like taking out insurance on their portfolio, letting them stay invested even when markets turn shaky.

Breaking down the $190-million onchain profit

Blockchain data traced the now-famous trade to wallet “0xb317,” which opened a massive short position just before the US tariff announcement that reportedly crashed the crypto markets.

On Hyperliquid, the trader placed a $208-million cross-margin perpetual short with 20x leverage. The position was entered at around $116,800, with a liquidation level near $121,000. As Bitcoin’s price fell, the trader’s unrealized profit topped $190 million — one of the most successful onchain short trades ever recorded.

However, the trade had broader consequences. More than 6,300 accounts took losses, over 1,000 wallets were completely liquidated, and total losses exceeded $1.23 billion. Hyperliquid’s auto-deleverage mechanism amplified the decline, adding to the selling pressure.

Within hours, the trader’s wallet position was deep in profit. It remains unclear whether the position was fully closed or partially maintained, leaving followers guessing about the trader’s timing and strategy.

Did you know? A large short position can amplify selling pressure, triggering a cascade of liquidations when prices drop quickly. This creates a domino effect in which each wave of liquidations drives prices even lower.

Wallet “0xb317” launches a new $163-million short against Bitcoin

Just days after reportedly earning $192 million, wallet “0xb317” entered another major short trade. On Oct. 12, 2025, the trader opened a $163-million leveraged position, betting against Bitcoin’s price.

The trader used roughly 10x leverage, with an entry price near $117,369 and a liquidation level at $123,510. The position leaves only a small margin, just a few thousand dollars above the entry, before hitting liquidation risk, reflecting both confidence and strategic risk management.

The execution suggests a deep understanding of market timing and liquidity dynamics. The trader appears to have strong insight into market movements and economic events, which allows them to consistently capitalize on volatility with the right timing and scale.

Success, systemic risk and the perils of decentralized leverage

The crypto community is divided over wallet 0xb317’s $192-million short trade. Some see it as a remarkable display of market skill, while others believe it was simple luck.

A section of the crypto community believes the anonymous trader’s success stems from skillfully reading onchain data, derivatives positions and market sentiment. Others, however, attribute the outcome to luck, arguing that random events can sometimes align with major global developments.

The trade’s timing, mere minutes before the US tariff announcement, sparked speculation about insider knowledge or front-running. Verifying such activity in decentralized markets is nearly impossible. Some also argue that the large short position may have deepened the market crash by triggering a wave of liquidations that intensified the sell-off.

Despite the trader’s success, significant risks remain in short trading. A sudden market rebound could trigger margin calls, slippage or liquidation, showing how quickly fortunes can change in the high-stakes, leveraged world of crypto trading.

Did you know? Short traders often use leverage, which means borrowing funds to amplify returns. While a 20x short can boost profits, it also magnifies losses. A small 5% move against the trader can wipe out the entire position, showing that leverage is both thrilling and dangerous.

The $192-million short trade has sparked renewed discussions over the integrity of the largely unregulated cryptocurrency market. It also highlights the wide gap between anonymous large-scale traders, or “whales,” and smaller retail participants.

The $192-million short trade not only marks a major profit but has also sparked broad discussion about the need for stronger oversight, transparency and accountability in largely unregulated cryptocurrency markets. In traditional finance, compliance with insider-trading and market-abuse laws is standard, but such checks are still evolving in the crypto space.

For smaller traders, the event serves as a reminder of how high leverage and limited capital can lead to severe losses during volatile periods.

The incident also raised concerns about decentralized derivatives platforms and their ability to handle large trades without causing market instability. It showed that even with safeguards like auto-deleverage systems and insurance funds, these platforms can still struggle under extreme conditions.

The trade has also prompted both ethical and legal questions. If market manipulation occurs, who can be held accountable in an anonymous market? Regulators may need to monitor trader activity more closely, particularly among whales. Developing stronger risk-management tools could also help reduce the risks tied to such situations.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/explained/how-an-anonymous-trader-made-192m-shorting-one-of-the-biggest-crypto-crashes?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Ambire Wallet Logo
Ambire Wallet Price(WALLET)
$0.00874
$0.00874$0.00874
+1.39%
USD
Ambire Wallet (WALLET) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00