Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, used a Yahoo Finance appearance to restate Bitwise’s view that Bitcoin is headed to $200,000 in 2026, while simultaneously characterizing the current sell-off as a maturing-market shakeout rather than a trend break. Is The Bottom In For Bitcoin? He opened with a near-term assessment that “we’re closer to the bottom here today than we have been for the past few weeks,” linking the drawdown to sharply risk-off conditions and to ETF-era flow dynamics. In his framing, Bitcoin “really was a leader of this risk-off move starting in mid-October,” and he expects it to “be a leader to the upside once things start to turn around,” adding that the market feels nearer to that inflection than it did “a week or two weeks ago.” When asked whether spot Bitcoin ETFs have become a double-edged sword, Rasmussen agreed, describing a market that now has deeper liquidity but more cross-currents. “Bitcoin, in our view, is one of the biggest technological developments of the past 15 years,” he said, before explaining that institutionalization brings “new investors and adds more liquidity to the market,” yet also means “we’re seeing a lot more choppiness in times where risk-off moves happen.” He pointed to hedge funds rotating in and out via basis trades and emphasized that “you just have more market participants.” Over time, he expects that shift to damp volatility, but not in a straight line: “throughout that journey, we’re going to see some choppiness, and certainly over the past month, we’ve seen that.” Related Reading: Will Bitcoin Bottom At $56,000? CryptoQuant CEO Presents The Data Pressed on why volatility still looks elevated, Rasmussen separated short-horizon spikes from long-run trend. “If you look at the trend over the past 10 years, volatility has certainly been falling,” he said, but conceded that “over this short-term period, you do see spikes in volatility.” The composition of buyers is, in his view, changing in a stabilizing direction. “The buyers for Bitcoin that we’re seeing come into the market today are more long-term buyers than we’ve seen in the past,” he said, naming wealth managers and financial advisors who “are adding Bitcoin to model portfolios” and “rebalancing on a standard basis.” That institutional style of demand “should all reduce volatility, add more long-term demand,” though he also noted a counterweight: corporate treasury buying that was strong earlier in the year has faded. “The corporate treasuries that are purchasing Bitcoin were coming in in size earlier this year, and that’s really dried up,” he said, arguing that this demand pause is “in part due to this sell-off that we’ve seen in October.” Bitcoin Still Set for $200,000 By 2026 Rasmussen acknowledged the pain of lower prices for recent buyers, but insisted the medium-term path remains higher. “Lower prices are a gift and a curse, of course,” he said. “A lot of investors are feeling pain right now who bought Bitcoin above $100,000 or closer to the $125,000 mark, but we believe that Bitcoin’s going to end the year higher than it is today.” He reiterated that the short-term bottoming process is likely advanced, and then pivoted to his structural thesis: “Institutions are finally here.” He stressed that adoption is gradual rather than instantaneous: “That doesn’t mean that right away they deploy all of their capital.” Even so, he cited early signals such as endowment participation: “even Harvard, we saw with their recent filing, is buying Bitcoin in their endowment.” Related Reading: Bitcoin Capitulation Deepens Around $90K Level: Classic Late-Stage Fear Structure Emerging On macro, Rasmussen conceded an irony that an asset marketed as sovereign and untethered now reacts to central-bank expectations. Post-COVID, he said, Bitcoin has traded in a “fiscally-dominated environment where rate cuts and other macro elements do play more of a role,” and correlations to equities have “spike[d] or raise[d].” Still, he argued correlations are drifting back toward historical lows, and he emphasized Bitcoin’s tendency to do well in “low rate environments and risk on environments.” Regarding the December Fed meeting, he said “no cut in December is largely priced into the market,” and suggested investors have “already started to turn to 2026.” The price target itself was stated unambiguously. “So this year, we had a price target of $200,000. And I think it’s safe to say that come December, that’s not going to happen. But we do believe that in 2026, Bitcoin will hit $200,000,” Rasmussen said. He attributed that forecast to institutional inflows arriving “in waves,” spanning “wealth managers or endowments or pensions or corporations or governments,” which he believes are creating “a systemic imbalance of demand versus supply.” At press time, BTC traded at $91,205. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.comRyan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, used a Yahoo Finance appearance to restate Bitwise’s view that Bitcoin is headed to $200,000 in 2026, while simultaneously characterizing the current sell-off as a maturing-market shakeout rather than a trend break. Is The Bottom In For Bitcoin? He opened with a near-term assessment that “we’re closer to the bottom here today than we have been for the past few weeks,” linking the drawdown to sharply risk-off conditions and to ETF-era flow dynamics. In his framing, Bitcoin “really was a leader of this risk-off move starting in mid-October,” and he expects it to “be a leader to the upside once things start to turn around,” adding that the market feels nearer to that inflection than it did “a week or two weeks ago.” When asked whether spot Bitcoin ETFs have become a double-edged sword, Rasmussen agreed, describing a market that now has deeper liquidity but more cross-currents. “Bitcoin, in our view, is one of the biggest technological developments of the past 15 years,” he said, before explaining that institutionalization brings “new investors and adds more liquidity to the market,” yet also means “we’re seeing a lot more choppiness in times where risk-off moves happen.” He pointed to hedge funds rotating in and out via basis trades and emphasized that “you just have more market participants.” Over time, he expects that shift to damp volatility, but not in a straight line: “throughout that journey, we’re going to see some choppiness, and certainly over the past month, we’ve seen that.” Related Reading: Will Bitcoin Bottom At $56,000? CryptoQuant CEO Presents The Data Pressed on why volatility still looks elevated, Rasmussen separated short-horizon spikes from long-run trend. “If you look at the trend over the past 10 years, volatility has certainly been falling,” he said, but conceded that “over this short-term period, you do see spikes in volatility.” The composition of buyers is, in his view, changing in a stabilizing direction. “The buyers for Bitcoin that we’re seeing come into the market today are more long-term buyers than we’ve seen in the past,” he said, naming wealth managers and financial advisors who “are adding Bitcoin to model portfolios” and “rebalancing on a standard basis.” That institutional style of demand “should all reduce volatility, add more long-term demand,” though he also noted a counterweight: corporate treasury buying that was strong earlier in the year has faded. “The corporate treasuries that are purchasing Bitcoin were coming in in size earlier this year, and that’s really dried up,” he said, arguing that this demand pause is “in part due to this sell-off that we’ve seen in October.” Bitcoin Still Set for $200,000 By 2026 Rasmussen acknowledged the pain of lower prices for recent buyers, but insisted the medium-term path remains higher. “Lower prices are a gift and a curse, of course,” he said. “A lot of investors are feeling pain right now who bought Bitcoin above $100,000 or closer to the $125,000 mark, but we believe that Bitcoin’s going to end the year higher than it is today.” He reiterated that the short-term bottoming process is likely advanced, and then pivoted to his structural thesis: “Institutions are finally here.” He stressed that adoption is gradual rather than instantaneous: “That doesn’t mean that right away they deploy all of their capital.” Even so, he cited early signals such as endowment participation: “even Harvard, we saw with their recent filing, is buying Bitcoin in their endowment.” Related Reading: Bitcoin Capitulation Deepens Around $90K Level: Classic Late-Stage Fear Structure Emerging On macro, Rasmussen conceded an irony that an asset marketed as sovereign and untethered now reacts to central-bank expectations. Post-COVID, he said, Bitcoin has traded in a “fiscally-dominated environment where rate cuts and other macro elements do play more of a role,” and correlations to equities have “spike[d] or raise[d].” Still, he argued correlations are drifting back toward historical lows, and he emphasized Bitcoin’s tendency to do well in “low rate environments and risk on environments.” Regarding the December Fed meeting, he said “no cut in December is largely priced into the market,” and suggested investors have “already started to turn to 2026.” The price target itself was stated unambiguously. “So this year, we had a price target of $200,000. And I think it’s safe to say that come December, that’s not going to happen. But we do believe that in 2026, Bitcoin will hit $200,000,” Rasmussen said. He attributed that forecast to institutional inflows arriving “in waves,” spanning “wealth managers or endowments or pensions or corporations or governments,” which he believes are creating “a systemic imbalance of demand versus supply.” At press time, BTC traded at $91,205. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Why Bitwise Thinks Bitcoin Still Hits $200,000 In 2026

2025/11/21 13:00

Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, used a Yahoo Finance appearance to restate Bitwise’s view that Bitcoin is headed to $200,000 in 2026, while simultaneously characterizing the current sell-off as a maturing-market shakeout rather than a trend break.

Is The Bottom In For Bitcoin?

He opened with a near-term assessment that “we’re closer to the bottom here today than we have been for the past few weeks,” linking the drawdown to sharply risk-off conditions and to ETF-era flow dynamics. In his framing, Bitcoin “really was a leader of this risk-off move starting in mid-October,” and he expects it to “be a leader to the upside once things start to turn around,” adding that the market feels nearer to that inflection than it did “a week or two weeks ago.”

When asked whether spot Bitcoin ETFs have become a double-edged sword, Rasmussen agreed, describing a market that now has deeper liquidity but more cross-currents. “Bitcoin, in our view, is one of the biggest technological developments of the past 15 years,” he said, before explaining that institutionalization brings “new investors and adds more liquidity to the market,” yet also means “we’re seeing a lot more choppiness in times where risk-off moves happen.”

He pointed to hedge funds rotating in and out via basis trades and emphasized that “you just have more market participants.” Over time, he expects that shift to damp volatility, but not in a straight line: “throughout that journey, we’re going to see some choppiness, and certainly over the past month, we’ve seen that.”

Pressed on why volatility still looks elevated, Rasmussen separated short-horizon spikes from long-run trend. “If you look at the trend over the past 10 years, volatility has certainly been falling,” he said, but conceded that “over this short-term period, you do see spikes in volatility.” The composition of buyers is, in his view, changing in a stabilizing direction. “The buyers for Bitcoin that we’re seeing come into the market today are more long-term buyers than we’ve seen in the past,” he said, naming wealth managers and financial advisors who “are adding Bitcoin to model portfolios” and “rebalancing on a standard basis.”

That institutional style of demand “should all reduce volatility, add more long-term demand,” though he also noted a counterweight: corporate treasury buying that was strong earlier in the year has faded. “The corporate treasuries that are purchasing Bitcoin were coming in in size earlier this year, and that’s really dried up,” he said, arguing that this demand pause is “in part due to this sell-off that we’ve seen in October.”

Bitcoin Still Set for $200,000 By 2026

Rasmussen acknowledged the pain of lower prices for recent buyers, but insisted the medium-term path remains higher. “Lower prices are a gift and a curse, of course,” he said. “A lot of investors are feeling pain right now who bought Bitcoin above $100,000 or closer to the $125,000 mark, but we believe that Bitcoin’s going to end the year higher than it is today.”

He reiterated that the short-term bottoming process is likely advanced, and then pivoted to his structural thesis: “Institutions are finally here.” He stressed that adoption is gradual rather than instantaneous: “That doesn’t mean that right away they deploy all of their capital.” Even so, he cited early signals such as endowment participation: “even Harvard, we saw with their recent filing, is buying Bitcoin in their endowment.”

On macro, Rasmussen conceded an irony that an asset marketed as sovereign and untethered now reacts to central-bank expectations. Post-COVID, he said, Bitcoin has traded in a “fiscally-dominated environment where rate cuts and other macro elements do play more of a role,” and correlations to equities have “spike[d] or raise[d].”

Still, he argued correlations are drifting back toward historical lows, and he emphasized Bitcoin’s tendency to do well in “low rate environments and risk on environments.” Regarding the December Fed meeting, he said “no cut in December is largely priced into the market,” and suggested investors have “already started to turn to 2026.”

The price target itself was stated unambiguously. “So this year, we had a price target of $200,000. And I think it’s safe to say that come December, that’s not going to happen. But we do believe that in 2026, Bitcoin will hit $200,000,” Rasmussen said. He attributed that forecast to institutional inflows arriving “in waves,” spanning “wealth managers or endowments or pensions or corporations or governments,” which he believes are creating “a systemic imbalance of demand versus supply.”

At press time, BTC traded at $91,205.

Bitcoin price
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto.com team ‘covered up a breach’ – Scattered Spider breach, revealed!

Crypto.com team ‘covered up a breach’ – Scattered Spider breach, revealed!

The post Crypto.com team ‘covered up a breach’ – Scattered Spider breach, revealed! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Were Crypto.com customer funds affected? No, Crypto.com confirmed that no customer funds were accessed or at risk. Only a very small number of users’ partial personal information was affected. Did Crypto.com disclose the breach publicly? No, the company did not publicly notify the impacted users, which drew criticism from blockchain investigator ZachXBT. Crypto.com reportedly suffered a previously undisclosed data breach linked to the Scattered Spider hacking group, raising concerns over its security posture. Details of the attack According to a Bloomberg investigation, the attack involved teenage hackers, including 18-year-old Noah Urban from Florida, who specialized in phishing employees at telecom, tech, and cryptocurrency firms. Urban and his collaborators accessed sensitive user information. The group previously targeted MGM Resorts and other corporations. Crypto.com acknowledged that the breach impacted “a very small number of individuals” but emphasized that no customer funds were compromised. Crypto.com’s response Despite this, the company did not notify the affected users publicly. Remarking on the same, Crypto.com CEO, Kris Marszalek, noted,  “Any suggestion that we did not report or disclose a security incident is completely unfounded – as we reported in a NMLS Notice of Data Security incident filing and in additional reports with the relevant jurisdictional regulators, we detected a phishing campaign that targeted one of our employees in 2023.” Marszalek stated that the incident was contained within hours, with no customer funds ever at risk, and only a very limited number of users’ partial personal information was affected. He even emphasized the company’s “security-first” culture. What does ZachXBT have to say about this breach? However, blockchain investigator ZachXBT took to X to call out Crypto.com for not disclosing the data breach. He said, “Your team covered up a breach that impacted the personal information of your users.” He added,  “They’ve been breached several times.”…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/22 19:52
Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Understanding the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL): Bridging L2 Fragmentation and Building a Seamless Cross-Chain Experience

Author: Pan Zhixiong Ethereum has successfully addressed the scaling issue over the past few years by deploying multiple Layer 2 solutions, such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, resulting in reduced transaction costs and increased efficiency. However, this has led to a fragmented user experience: each L2 network acts like an isolated island, with users facing cumbersome steps, different bridging protocols, and complex asset and gas management when crossing chains. To address this pain point, the Ethereum core team recently proposed the Ethereum Interop Layer (EIL). To understand EIL, we first need to review its foundation—ERC-4337. ERC-4337 is an account abstraction standard proposed by Ethereum. It requires no changes to the underlying Ethereum protocol, implementing a new type of account structure—the smart account—simply by deploying smart contracts. This type of account not only supports advanced features such as social recovery, multisignature, and batch operations, but also allows for gas payments using ERC-20 tokens via smart contracts. However, despite the many technological innovations brought by ERC-4337, its adoption in practice remains limited. Fragmented user experience, difficulties in multi-chain collaboration, high gas costs, and ecosystem compatibility issues all restrict the widespread adoption of 4337. The EIL was developed to address these issues on top of ERC-4337. EIL is an additional multi-chain interoperability protocol built upon the ERC-4337 framework . It extends the single-chain account abstraction to multi-chain account interoperability, enabling a seamless experience across multiple L2 networks. Specifically, EIL implements two important innovations: one-signature multi-chain operations (bulk authorization) and a competitive funding mechanism for cross-chain liquidity providers (XLPs). The first innovation, bulk authorization , allows users to authorize multiple operations across multiple L2 networks with a single signature. Specifically, the wallet first constructs its own UserOperation on each relevant chain, then integrates these operations into a Merkle tree. Users only need to sign the root of the tree once. When a smart account on each chain verifies a received UserOperation, it only needs to verify that it belongs to the Merkle tree and that the signature is valid to execute the operation. This approach significantly simplifies the cross-chain operation process for users. The second innovation, the auction-based funding mechanism, introduces a role called Cross-chain Liquidity Provider (XLP). XLPs are responsible for providing asset transfer and gas payment services between different chains. When a user locks assets on the source chain and submits a cross-chain request, multiple XLPs can bid on the request through on-chain auction. The XLP that wins the bid provides a cross-chain asset transfer voucher, allowing the user to directly obtain funds and gas payments on the target chain to complete the required cross-chain operation. Only after the transaction is completed will the XLP claim the user's previously locked assets on the source chain. To ensure security and fairness, XLPs must be staked on the Ethereum mainnet (L1) and subject to a strict dispute arbitration mechanism. If an XLP violates the rules, the staked assets will be forfeited, thus ensuring its integrity through economic incentives . It's worth emphasizing that EIL doesn't require any changes to the consensus protocol of the Ethereum mainnet or L2 network during its implementation . All implementations are based on smart contracts and the existing ERC-4337 account abstraction framework. This design not only reduces the difficulty of implementation but also significantly reduces the security risks the chain itself may face. Of course, this design also shifts the pressure and complexity to the wallet and off-chain infrastructure . The wallet needs to support complex multi-chain transaction construction, one-signature multi-chain verification, interaction mechanisms with CrossChainPaymaster and XLP, and needs to provide a simple and user-friendly interface. The off-chain infrastructure, on the other hand, needs to build a robust auction market, monitor XLP fund flows in real time, and manage risks. Ultimately, EIL provides users with a single-chain-like experience. In the future, when users open EIL-enabled wallets, they will no longer need to frequently switch chains, manage cross-chain assets, or endure lengthy cross-chain waits and cumbersome procedures. All complex cross-chain details will be completed automatically outside the user's view, gradually unifying the user experience across the entire Ethereum L2 ecosystem and truly realizing the vision of multi-chain integration and seamless interoperability. EIL also opens up a whole new possibility for the entire Ethereum ecosystem: it not only solves the cross-chain user experience problem, but more importantly, it truly allows multiple L2 networks to "become one" in a secure, decentralized, and trustless way.
Share
PANews2025/11/21 14:00