Strategy alerts MSCI, warning Bitcoin treasury exclusions could harm U.S. security.Strategy alerts MSCI, warning Bitcoin treasury exclusions could harm U.S. security.

Strategy Warns Against MSCI Exclusion of Bitcoin Treasuries

2025/12/11 05:21
What to Know:
  • Strategy alerts MSCI about Bitcoin treasury exclusion risks.
  • Potential $2.8 billion stock outflows estimated.
  • U.S. national security and market stability questioned.

Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, warns MSCI that excluding Bitcoin treasuries from its indexes could harm U.S. economic and national security interests amid ongoing consultations.

Exclusion could significantly impact capital flows and institutional involvement in Bitcoin, affecting both Strategy’s stock and broader U.S. digital asset industry competitiveness.

Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, is challenging MSCI’s consideration to exclude cryptocurrency treasury companies from its indexes, emphasizing possible negative impacts on U.S. interests.

This development could lead to massive capital outflows, potentially undermining both the U.S. digital asset industry and national security interests.

Strategy Opposes MSCI’s Bitcoin Index Exclusion Plan

Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, holds the largest corporate Bitcoin treasury and has raised concerns regarding MSCI’s index exclusion for digital asset companies. The response follows MSCI’s consultation about companies with more than 50% digital assets.

Potential $2.8 Billion Stock Outflows Forecasted

Strategy forecasts substantial consequences, estimating forced stock outflows up to $2.8 billion if excluded. This financial impact could deter institutional investors from engaging with Bitcoin-treasury companies.

Such exclusion contradicts U.S. pro-innovation policies and undermines national security objectives, as stated by Strategy. Unlike other concentrated sectors, Bitcoin-focused firms risk being disproportionately affected, raising questions about policy fairness and consistency.

MSCI’s Policy Shift Challenges Historical Index Neutrality

Historically, MSCI has maintained index neutrality without excluding sectors like gold or real estate. Strategy argues this discrimination contrasts with past practices, setting a concerning precedent for digital assets.

Financial experts indicate that altering index policies might decrease U.S. competitiveness in digital asset markets. Considering previous index neutrality, a change could destabilize established market dynamics and affect corporate Bitcoin reserves.

Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile, and investing involves risk. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The U.S. OCC has warned Wall Street about the "de-banking" of industries such as digital assets, calling such practices "illegal."

The U.S. OCC has warned Wall Street about the "de-banking" of industries such as digital assets, calling such practices "illegal."

PANews reported on December 11th, citing CoinDesk, that President Trump's actions against the "debanking" of controversial industries such as digital assets have prompted the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to release a new report. The report further confirms past practices and warns that banks suspected of involvement could face penalties. This brief OCC report reviewed nine of the largest national banks in the United States, concluding that "between 2020 and 2023, these banks developed public and private policies that restricted certain industries from accessing banking services, including requiring escalating reviews and approvals before providing financial services." The report states that some large banks set higher barriers to entry for controversial or environmentally sensitive businesses, or activities that contradict the banks' own values. Financial giants such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citigroup are highlighted, with links to their past public policies, particularly those concerning environmental issues. The report states, "The OCC intends to pursue accountability for any illegal 'debanking' activities by these banks, including referring related cases to the Attorney General." However, it remains unclear which specific laws these activities may have violated.
Share
PANews2025/12/11 09:04