Strategy urges MSCI to drop its plan to exclude digital asset treasury firms, arguing the proposal harms investors and misjudges the sector.     Strategy has nowStrategy urges MSCI to drop its plan to exclude digital asset treasury firms, arguing the proposal harms investors and misjudges the sector.     Strategy has now

Strategy challenges MSCI plan to drop digital asset companies

2025/12/12 00:00

Strategy urges MSCI to drop its plan to exclude digital asset treasury firms, arguing the proposal harms investors and misjudges the sector.

Strategy has now voiced its opposition to an MSCI proposal that would remove digital asset treasury companies from major indexes. 

The proposal targets firms that hold more than half of their balance sheets in digital assets and Strategy said the idea misjudges how these companies operate. The firm believes the decision would harm investors and send the wrong message to the market.

The letter from Strategy carried the signatures of Michael Saylor and its CEO, Phong Le. They said MSCI aims to bring order to index rules, yet this measure steps in the wrong direction. 

Strategy outlines why the threshold does not work

Strategy said that its structure makes it different from a fund. Instead, the firm functions as an operating company.

It manages its business each day, builds long-term plans and adapts as Bitcoin technology changes. The letter explained that firms like Strategy choose concentrated holdings for clear business reasons. 

The approach is similar to other familiar sectors. For example, real estate companies hold real estate. Oil firms hold oil reserves and Timber groups hold wood. All of these firms remain in MSCI indexes.

Strategy said the proposal treats digital asset companies harshly, and the firm noted that MSCI would need new methods to measure balance sheet composition.

Those methods would vary across regions and asset classes and that would create confusion for both analysts and market operators.Phong Le later expanded on this during an interview. 

He said the proposal sends the wrong signal to a growing field. He pointed to companies like Chevron, Weyerhaeuser and Simon Property Group, which hold large shares of their assets in one class. 

These firms face no threat of exclusion and Le said Strategy shares the same logic. 

Concerns about market distortion and lost access

Strategy warned that exclusion from MSCI indexes would bring changes to market behavior. JPMorgan analysts estimated that Strategy alone could face forced selling of nearly $2.8 billion. 

That figure shows index-linked funds that may need to exit their positions if the proposal becomes real.

Such pressure could push miners to change their approach. Miners often hold Bitcoin as part of their plan, and a sudden push to avoid heavy holdings might cause miners to sell more quickly. 

That move could change supply patterns and weaken long-term planning across the field.

Strategy also said the proposal could block many workers from gaining exposure to digital assets through pension plans.

Strategy points out issues with MSCI’s fund label

MSCI suggested that digital asset treasury companies may act like funds, but Strategy rejected this point. Le said the company has been public since 1998. 

It operates under a corporate structure compared to funds because staff members build products, manage operations and run the business each day. The firm also adds Bitcoin to its balance sheet as part of a long-running plan. 

Strategy said this differs from a fund that buys assets for outside clients.

Related Reading: Strategy Confirms Latest Buy Of 10,624 BTC for $962 Million

Why Strategy sees the proposal as misguided

Strategy believes that MSCI is misreading the nature of digital asset treasury companies, and said that Bitcoin serves as a core business tool. 

It helps shape long-term value and shields the company from weakening cash balances. Strategy said this approach follows clear business logic rather than speculative motives.

The letter argued that digital assets may become important parts of global finance at some point in the future. 

Because of this, Strategy said the proposal would slow access for many market participants. The firm said this restriction would also place digital asset firms at a disadvantage while other sectors enjoy index inclusion without such scrutiny.

Phong Le added that the proposal arrived too early. He said the field continues to grow and he urged MSCI to support that growth instead of setting narrow rules that limit progress.

The post Strategy challenges MSCI plan to drop digital asset companies appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SEC issues investor guide on crypto wallets and custody risks

SEC issues investor guide on crypto wallets and custody risks

The SEC released a guide on crypto wallets and custody for investors.
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/12/14 08:38
UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21