The symfony/workflow component has long been one of the framework’s most powerful, yet underutilized, gems. It allows developers to decouple business process logicThe symfony/workflow component has long been one of the framework’s most powerful, yet underutilized, gems. It allows developers to decouple business process logic

Here's How You Can Build a FinTech Approval System With Symfony 7.4

2025/12/15 01:00
10 min read

The symfony/workflow component has long been one of the framework’s most powerful, yet underutilized, gems. It allows developers to decouple business process logic from entity state, transforming complex “spaghetti code” status checks into clean, visualizable directed graphs.

\ For years, however, the component had a strict limitation rooted in its implementation of Petri nets: Tokens were boolean. An object was either in a place (state), or it wasn’t. While you could be in multiple places simultaneously (parallel processing), you couldn’t be in the same place multiple times.

\ Symfony 7.4 changes the game with Weighted Transitions.

This new feature introduces multiplicity. You can now model scenarios where quantities matter: “collect 4 signatures,” “process 5 batch items,” or “wait for 3 subsystems to initialize.”

\ In this article, we will build a robust Multi-Signature Approval System for a FinTech application. We will explore how to configure weighted transitions, implement the entity logic, and verify the flow with rigorous testing — all using Symfony 7.4 and PHP 8.3.

The Concept (Petri Nets vs. State Machines)

Before writing code, it is crucial to understand why this feature exists.

The State Machine Limitation

A State Machine is linear. An elevator is either STOPPEDMOVINGUP, or MOVINGDOWN. It cannot be MOVINGUP twice. This is perfect for simpler statuses (e.g., Order::STATUSPAID).

The Workflow (Petri Net)

Workflow allows an object to sit in multiple places at once. In a “New Employee Onboarding” process, an employee might simultaneously be in:

  • provisioning_laptop
  • creatingemailaccount

\ Both must be completed before they move to onboarded.

The Missing Piece: Multiplicity

Prior to Symfony 7.4, if you needed “3 Managers to approve an expense,” you couldn’t model this purely in the Workflow. You had to:

  1. Create a waitingforapproval place.
  2. Add a counter field to your entity ($approvalCount).
  3. Use a Guard Event listener to check if ($subject->getApprovalCount() >= 3) before allowing the transition.

\ With Weighted Transitions, the “counter” is now part of the workflow state itself. The workflow engine natively understands that the subject is in the approved state 3 times.

Project Setup

Let’s create a new Symfony project and install the necessary components.

composer create-project symfony/skeleton:"7.4.*" fintech-approval cd fintech-approval composer require symfony/workflow symfony/framework-bundle symfony/orm-pack symfony/maker-bundle

\ We will also need a database. For this example, we’ll use SQLite for simplicity, but the logic applies to MySQL/PostgreSQL exactly the same.

# .env DATABASE_URL="sqlite:///%kernel.project_dir%/var/data.db"

Configuration (The Core Logic)

This is where the magic happens. We will define a workflow called expense_approval.

\ The Scenario:

  1. An expense report is created (draft).
  2. It is submitted (review_required).
  3. The Weighted Step: The system distributes the request to 3 required approvers.
  4. Each approver grants approval individually.
  5. Once 3 approvals are collected, the expense moves to readyforpayment.

\ Create or update config/packages/workflow.yaml:

# config/packages/workflow.yaml framework: workflows: expense_approval: type: workflow # MUST be 'workflow', not 'state_machine' audit_trail: enabled: true marking_store: type: method property: currentState # This must hold an array supports: - App\Entity\ExpenseReport initial_marking: draft places: - draft - review_pool - approved_pool - ready_for_payment - rejected transitions: submit: from: draft to: - place: review_pool weight: 3 # <--- OUTPUT WEIGHT approve: from: review_pool to: approved_pool # Default weight is 1. One 'review_pool' token becomes one 'approved_pool' token. reject: from: review_pool to: rejected # If rejected, we might want to clear all tokens, # but for simplicity, one rejection moves to rejected. finalize: from: - place: approved_pool weight: 3 # <--- INPUT WEIGHT to: ready_for_payment

Deconstructing the Config

  1. type: workflow: Weighted transitions rely on token buckets. This is not possible in a state machine.
  2. submitTransition: \n - to: { place: reviewpool, weight: 3 } - When this fires, the reviewpoolplace receives 3 tokens. \n - Think of this as creating 3 “tickets” that need to be punched.
  3. approveTransition: \n -from: reviewpool, to: approvedpool. \n - Standard 1-to-1 weight. \n - Because we have 3 tokens in review_pool, we can fire this transition 3 times.
  4. finalizeTransition: \n - from: { place: approvedpool, weight: 3 }- This transition is blocked until the approvedpoolcontains exactly (or at least) 3 tokens. \n - Once the 3rd approval comes in, this path unlocks.

The Entity

We need an entity that supports this “Multi-State” marking store. The currentState property must be an array to hold the token counts (e.g., [‘reviewpool’ => 2, ‘approvedpool’ => 1]).

namespace App\Entity; use App\Repository\ExpenseReportRepository; use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; #[ORM\Entity(repositoryClass: ExpenseReportRepository::class)] class ExpenseReport { #[ORM\Id] #[ORM\GeneratedValue] #[ORM\Column] private ?int $id = null; #[ORM\Column(length: 255)] private string $description; #[ORM\Column] private float $amount; /** * Stores the workflow state. * For Weighted Workflows, this stores the places and their quantities. * Example DB content: {"review_pool": 2, "approved_pool": 1} */ #[ORM\Column(type: 'json')] private array $currentState = []; public function __construct(string $description, float $amount) { $this->description = $description; $this->amount = $amount; // Initial marking is handled by the workflow component, // but initializing to empty array is good practice. } public function getId(): ?int { return $this->id; } public function getDescription(): string { return $this->description; } public function getAmount(): float { return $this->amount; } public function getCurrentState(): array { return $this->currentState; } public function setCurrentState(array $currentState): self { $this->currentState = $currentState; return $this; } }

\ Run the migration:

php bin/console make:migration php bin/console doctrine:migrations:migrate

The Service Layer

To interact with this workflow cleanly, we should create a service. This service will handle the logic of “who” is approving, though for this tutorial, we will focus on the workflow mechanics.

namespace App\Service; use App\Entity\ExpenseReport; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\WorkflowInterface; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Registry; readonly class ExpenseManager { public function __construct( private Registry $workflowRegistry, ) {} public function submit(ExpenseReport $expense): void { $workflow = $this->getWorkflow($expense); if ($workflow->can($expense, 'submit')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'submit'); } else { throw new \LogicException('Cannot submit this expense report.'); } } public function approve(ExpenseReport $expense): void { $workflow = $this->getWorkflow($expense); // In a real app, you would check "Is the current user one of the allowed approvers?" here. if ($workflow->can($expense, 'approve')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); // Check if we can auto-finalize (if 3 approvals are met) if ($workflow->can($expense, 'finalize')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'finalize'); } } else { throw new \LogicException('Approval not needed or not allowed.'); } } public function getStatus(ExpenseReport $expense): array { // returns something like ['review_pool' => 2, 'approved_pool' => 1] return $expense->getCurrentState(); } private function getWorkflow(ExpenseReport $expense): WorkflowInterface { return $this->workflowRegistry->get($expense, 'expense_approval'); } }

The “Auto-Finalize” Logic

Notice the approve method. After applying approve, we immediately check can($expense, ‘finalize’).

  1. First Approval: \n -reviewpool: 2 \n -approvedpool: 1 \n -finalize needs 3 approved_poolcan(‘finalize’) returns false.
  2. Second Approval: \n -reviewpool: 1 \n -approvedpool: 2 \n -can(‘finalize’) returns false.
  3. Third Approval: \n reviewpool: 0 \n approvedpool: 3 \n finalize needs 3. can(‘finalize’) returns true. \n We apply finalize. \n New State:readyforpayment: 1.

Visualizing the Workflow

Before testing, it is incredibly helpful to visualize the graph, especially with weights involved. Symfony provides a dumper command.

php bin/console workflow:dump expense_approval | dot -Tpng -o workflow.png

\ You need graphviz installed on your machine to use dot. If you don’t have it, you can paste the text output into an online Graphviz viewer.

\ The output will visually represent the arrows with labels like weight: 3, making it clear that the submit transition spawns multiple tokens.

Verification (Unit Testing)

We don’t just hope it works; we prove it. We will use a KernelTestCase to load the actual workflow configuration and test the transitions.

//tests/Workflow/ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest.php namespace App\Tests\Workflow; use App\Entity\ExpenseReport; use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Test\KernelTestCase; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\WorkflowInterface; class ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest extends KernelTestCase { private WorkflowInterface $workflow; protected function setUp(): void { self::bootKernel(); $container = static::getContainer(); $registry = $container->get('workflow.registry'); // We create a dummy subject to get the workflow // In a real app, passing the class name to the registry is preferred if supported, // or fetching by name directly if you have a custom service alias. $subject = new ExpenseReport('Test', 100.0); $this->workflow = $registry->get($subject, 'expense_approval'); } public function testWeightedApprovalFlow(): void { $expense = new ExpenseReport('MacBook Pro', 3000.00); // 1. Initial State $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'submit')); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'submit'); // Verify tokens: Should be in review_pool 3 times $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertArrayHasKey('review_pool', $marking); $this->assertEquals(3, $marking['review_pool'], 'Should have 3 pending reviews'); // 2. First Approval $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'approve')); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertEquals(2, $marking['review_pool']); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['approved_pool']); // Check that we CANNOT finalize yet (need 3 approvals) $this->assertFalse($this->workflow->can($expense, 'finalize'), 'Should not finalize with only 1 approval'); // 3. Second Approval $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['review_pool']); $this->assertEquals(2, $marking['approved_pool']); // 4. Third Approval $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); // At this specific moment, review_pool is 0, approved_pool is 3 $this->assertEquals(0, $marking['review_pool'] ?? 0); $this->assertEquals(3, $marking['approved_pool']); // 5. Finalize $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'finalize'), 'Should be able to finalize now'); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'finalize'); // 6. Verify End State $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertArrayHasKey('ready_for_payment', $marking); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['ready_for_payment']); // Previous tokens should be consumed $this->assertArrayNotHasKey('approved_pool', $marking); } }

\ Run the test:

php bin/phpunit tests/Workflow/ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest.php

Advanced Usage & Best Practices

Using Enums for Places (New in 7.4)

Symfony 7.4 also adds support for Backed Enums in workflows. Instead of hardcoding strings like ‘review_pool’, you should define an Enum.

namespace App\Enum; enum ExpenseState: string { case DRAFT = 'draft'; case REVIEW_POOL = 'review_pool'; case APPROVED_POOL = 'approved_pool'; case READY = 'ready_for_payment'; case REJECTED = 'rejected'; }

You can then update your workflow.yaml (though YAML still uses strings, your PHP code can use ExpenseState::REVIEW_POOL->value).

Guard Events with Weights

You might want to prevent the same person from approving 3 times. Weighted transitions allow the transition approve to be called 3 times, but the workflow engine doesn’t inherently know who called it.

\ To solve this, use a Guard Listener.

#[AsEventListener('workflow.expense_approval.guard.approve')] public function preventDoubleApproval(GuardEvent $event): void { /** @var ExpenseReport $expense */ $expense = $event->getSubject(); $user = $this->security->getUser(); // Imagine the entity has a list of who already approved if ($expense->hasApproved($user)) { $event->setBlocked(true, 'You have already approved this expense.'); } }

Handling Rejection (Token Cleanup)

One challenge with weighted tokens is cleanup. If we have 2 approvals and the 3rd person calls reject, what happens to the 2 tokens sitting in approved_pool?

\ In a standard workflow, moving to rejected might leave those approved_pool tokens straggling (creating a zombie state where the report is both Rejected and Partially Approved).

\ The reject transition should ideally consume all tokens. However, dynamic consumption isn’t supported purely in YAML (you can’t say “consume ALL”).

\ Using an Event Subscriber on workflow.entered.rejected, you can manually reset the marking store.

public function onRejected(Event $event): void { $expense = $event->getSubject(); // Force reset state to ONLY rejected $expense->setCurrentState(['rejected' => 1]); }

Conclusion

Symfony 7.4’s Weighted Workflow Transitions bridge the gap between simple state management and complex Petri net logic. By allowing multiple instances of a state (tokens) to exist simultaneously, we can now model voting systems, manufacturing assembly lines, and batch processing logic directly in the configuration, drastically reducing the amount of custom PHP boilerplate required.

\ Key Takeaways:

  1. Multiplicity: Places can hold multiple tokens, allowing for parallel accumulation of state.
  2. Configuration: Use weight in your to (output) and from (input) definitions to control token flow.
  3. Storage: Ensure your Marking Store property is an array (e.g., a JSON column) to track token counts per place.
  4. Verification: Always utilize the workflow:dump command and write KernelTestCase tests to prove your graph logic before deployment.

\ This feature solidifies Symfony’s Workflow component as the premier PHP solution for state management, allowing you to delete fragile “counter” properties and rely on a mathematically sound architecture.

Let’s Be in Touch

Adopting these advanced patterns can significantly simplify your domain logic, but the transition isn’t always obvious. If you are looking to modernize your Symfony stack, need a second pair of eyes on your architecture, or just want to geek out over the latest Petri net implementations, I’d love to hear from you.

\ Let’s be in touch — connect with me on LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-mochalkin/) to continue the conversation on modern PHP architecture.

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.00965
$0.00965$0.00965
-1.43%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

The post Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Coinbase has filed a letter with the DOJ urging federal preemption of state crypto laws, citing Oregon’s securities suit, New York’s ETH stance, and staking bans. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal called state actions “government run amok,” warning that patchwork enforcement “slows innovation and harms consumers.” A legal expert told Decrypt that states risk violating interstate commerce rules and due process, and DOJ support for preemption may mark a potential turning point. Coinbase has gone on the offensive against state regulators, petitioning the Department of Justice that a patchwork of lawsuits and licensing schemes is tearing America’s crypto market apart. “When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken,” Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal tweeted on Tuesday. “This isn’t federalism—this is government run amok.” When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken. This isn’t federalism–this is government run amok. We just sent a letter to @TheJusticeDept urging federal action on crypto market structure to remedy this. 1/3 — paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) September 16, 2025 Coinbase’s filing says that states are “expansively interpreting their securities laws in ways that undermine federal law” and violate the dormant Commerce Clause by projecting regulatory preferences beyond state borders. “The current patchwork of state laws isn’t just inefficient – it slows innovation and harms consumers” and demands “federal action on crypto market structure,” Grewal said.  States vs. Coinbase It pointed to Oregon’s securities lawsuit against the exchange, New York’s bid to classify Ethereum as a security, and cease-and-desist orders on staking as proof that rogue states are trying to resurrect the SEC’s discredited “regulation by enforcement” playbook. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield sued Coinbase in April for promoting unregistered securities, and in July asked a federal judge to return the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:52
Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality

Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality

The post Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Quantum Computing Crypto Threat
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/09 06:25
Top Crypto Presales for February Include Pepepawn and OPZ, but the Upcoming Crypto That Looks Like a True 100x Thunder Is DeepSnitch AI

Top Crypto Presales for February Include Pepepawn and OPZ, but the Upcoming Crypto That Looks Like a True 100x Thunder Is DeepSnitch AI

Bitcoin had another sharp drop on Feb. 6, falling to $60,000. This caused fear in some investors and panic in others. But seasoned investors know that these falls
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/09 06:00