A resident of Mexico who served as a senior promoter in the IcomTech crypto Ponzi has been sentenced to 71 months in federal prison. According to a statement fromA resident of Mexico who served as a senior promoter in the IcomTech crypto Ponzi has been sentenced to 71 months in federal prison. According to a statement from

IcomTech promoter gets 71 months in prison for multi-million dollar crypto Ponzi scheme

A resident of Mexico who served as a senior promoter in the IcomTech crypto Ponzi has been sentenced to 71 months in federal prison.

Summary
  • Magdaleno Mendoza, an IconTech senior promoter, was sentenced to 71 months in federal prison.
  • Mendoza has been ordered to pay over $789,000 in restitution and forfeit $1.5 million.

According to a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, Magdaleno Mendoza has been handed a prison sentence for his role in helping orchestrate the multimillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that targeted working-class Spanish-speaking investors.

Mendoza allegedly exploited the trust of victims by promising guaranteed daily returns from cryptocurrency trading and mining, but in reality stole millions while using investor funds to enrich himself and fellow promoters.

“As a senior promoter of IcomTech, Mendoza helped prey on Spanish-speaking victims who lacked investment experience, including our fellow New Yorkers,” said U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton.

How did the IcomTech Ponzi work?

IcomTech advertised itself as a cryptocurrency mining and trading firm that operated between mid-2018 and late 2019. The platform promised daily investment returns in cash, along with access to an online portal where users could supposedly track profits.

However, authorities say the company was never engaged in real trading or mining. Instead, it operated as a multilevel marketing Ponzi scheme that recycled money from new investors to pay returns to earlier ones in order to maintain the illusion of legitimacy.

Mendoza, along with his co-conspirators, held flashy promotional events across the United States to lure victims with promises of financial freedom. 

“They boasted about the amount of money they were earning,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office said, and often arrived at events in expensive cars and luxury clothing to project success.

All the while, they were using investor funds to bankroll personal expenses, including lavish lifestyles, real estate, and other luxury goods, while victims watched fake profits accrue on dashboards they couldn’t access or withdraw from.

“Mendoza personally hosted IcomTech promotional events at his restaurant in the greater Los Angeles area, where he collected thousands in cash from his victims as purported IcomTech investments,” the statement noted.

The scheme started to unravel as early as August 2018 when victims who attempted to withdraw their money faced increasing roadblocks. When they reached out to promoters for help, they were met with excuses, delays, and hidden fees—if they were able to recover anything at all.

To keep the scheme afloat, IcomTech started offering its own crypto token, dubbed “Icoms,” as a supposed solution to the growing number of complaints from investors. However, authorities claim these tokens were worthless and ultimately resulted in more financial losses for the victims.

Mendoza ordered to pay restitution

As part of the sentencing, Mendoza has been ordered to pay $789,218.94 in restitution to victims and forfeit $1.5 million, including his residence in Downey, California, which had been purchased using proceeds from the scheme.

His sentence also included penalties for illegally residing in the United States after being deported on four separate occasions—including once under a false identity.

Prosecutors also said Mendoza went on to promote at least three more cryptocurrency Ponzi schemes after IcomTech collapsed.

Late last year, the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations led to civil penalties for five other promoters of the scheme, who were ordered to pay over $5 million in combined restitution and fines.

The order followed the March 2024 conviction of Gustavo Rodriguez, who built and managed the sham investment portal, and David Brend, who was convicted of misappropriating investor funds and organizing fraudulent promotional events. Both men have since been sentenced to prison.

Market Opportunity
Multichain Logo
Multichain Price(MULTI)
$0.03892
$0.03892$0.03892
+4.56%
USD
Multichain (MULTI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00