Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) stock (MSTR) had a difficult 2025, declining 49.3% as sustained selling pressure drove shares to their lowest level since lateStrategy (formerly MicroStrategy) stock (MSTR) had a difficult 2025, declining 49.3% as sustained selling pressure drove shares to their lowest level since late

MicroStrategy’s Stock Slid Over 49% in 2025: Why 2026 Could Be Another Tough Year

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) stock (MSTR) had a difficult 2025, declining 49.3% as sustained selling pressure drove shares to their lowest level since late September 2024.

As 2026 begins, the outlook remains challenging, with the company facing growing uncertainty over a potential exclusion from the MSCI index as the decision deadline looms on January 15.

Why (Micro) Strategy’s Stock Struggled in 2025

2025 proved to be a tough year for the crypto market, and digital asset treasuries were not spared. The impact was quite visible in the performance of Strategy’s stock.

Market data shows that MSTR lost 49.3% of its value in 2025, with losses accelerating in the second half of the year.

MSTR Stock Performance. Source: Google Finance

Analyst Ted Pillows highlighted the scale of the downturn, noting that MSTR has fallen 66% over the past six months alone. According to Pillows, nearly $90 billion has been wiped from the company’s market capitalization.

He pointed to several contributing factors, starting with Bitcoin’s underwhelming price performance. The largest cryptocurrency ended 2025 down 5.7%, defying many bullish forecasts. The muted performance placed substantial pressure on Strategy’s stock.

The company is closely tied to Bitcoin, being the largest corporate holder of the asset. It owns 672,497 BTC, equivalent to roughly 3.2% of Bitcoin’s total supply.

As previously reported by BeInCrypto, Strategy has spent over $50 billion accumulating Bitcoin, primarily financed through debt issuance and stock sales. In contrast, the company’s software business generates approximately $460 million in annual revenue, a figure that pales in comparison to its exposure to digital assets.

While Strategy currently holds roughly $59 billion worth of Bitcoin, its total market capitalization stands at about $46 billion, raising concerns about valuation and balance sheet risk.

Besides BTC’s price, Pillows outlined several other factors, such as:

Despite this, the firm has continued to increase its Bitcoin exposure. In fact, Strategy has previously emphasized that its balance sheet is strong enough to withstand major downturns in Bitcoin’s price.

MSCI Decision Poses a Key Risk for Strategy

While broader market conditions remain subject to change, Strategy faces a more immediate structural challenge tied to a pending MSCI decision.

MSCI has proposed reclassifying companies whose digital asset holdings exceed 50% of total assets as “funds.” This move could make them ineligible for inclusion in key equity benchmarks.

For Strategy, the implications are significant. A final decision, expected by January 15, could result in the company’s removal from MSCI indexes.

JPMorgan estimates that an MSCI exclusion could result in as much as $8.8 billion in outflows. This would exacerbate existing stress on Strategy’s share price at a time when investor sentiment remains fragile. Thus, all attention is now on the MSCI decision, as it may shape Strategy’s near-term stock performance.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0,00000001311
$0,00000001311$0,00000001311
0,00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41