TLDR Experts believe XRP price in 2026 will depend more on supply lockups than transaction volume. Fast settlement on the XRP Ledger reduces the need for large TLDR Experts believe XRP price in 2026 will depend more on supply lockups than transaction volume. Fast settlement on the XRP Ledger reduces the need for large

XRP Price in 2026 Could Rise on Locked Supply, Not Network Usage

TLDR

  • Experts believe XRP price in 2026 will depend more on supply lockups than transaction volume.
  • Fast settlement on the XRP Ledger reduces the need for large idle XRP holdings.
  • DeFi projects like mXRP are targeting up to $10 billion worth of locked XRP.
  • The Flare Network aims to lock 5 billion XRP by the middle of 2026.
  • XRP-focused ETFs have already accumulated over 500 million XRP.

The ongoing debate within the XRP community has intensified as experts discuss what could influence XRP price in 2026, with recent analysis shifting focus away from transaction volumes and toward factors affecting available supply, lockups, and institutional holdings that reduce circulating tokens but not necessarily trading activity.

Fast Settlement Limits XRP Price Impact

Many XRP holders argue that higher transaction volume on the XRP Ledger will raise XRP price over time. However, analysts highlight that XRP settles transactions in seconds, reducing the need for tokens to stay idle.

This quick settlement limits the impact of transaction activity on the amount of XRP held in circulation. As a result, even with rising usage, there may be limited upward pressure on XRP price based on volume alone.

“Money moves too quickly through the XRPL for volume to drive long-term price,” one analyst said. Thus, the argument linking daily usage to market value is now facing increased scrutiny from industry observers.

Supply Lockup Gains Attention Among Analysts

According to All Things XRP, locked XRP now plays a larger role in shaping market value in 2026 projections. Their analysis points to various initiatives that reduce available supply, potentially influencing XRP price dynamics.

For instance, mXRP DeFi projects are expected to lock up $10 billion worth of XRP in the coming cycle. In parallel, the Flare Network targets a lockup of 5 billion XRP by mid-2026, affecting the total liquid supply.

ETFs focused on XRP have already secured over 500 million tokens, while exchange reserves continue declining. These movements shift attention toward the supply-side equation, raising the case for a possible supply-driven price change.

“XRP is getting locked in systems that don’t trade frequently,” All Things XRP stated in their recent breakdown. This behavior effectively removes XRP from daily trading, even if demand remains unchanged or increases slightly.

Analysts Question Validity of Supply Shock Theory

While proponents push the supply shock thesis, critics argue exchange reserves still contain large volumes of XRP. Recent data shows 15.4 billion XRP remain on 26 trading platforms, led by Upbit, Binance, and Bithumb.

Upbit alone holds 6.25 billion XRP, while Binance follows with 2.52 billion and Bithumb with 1.82 billion. These figures challenge claims that XRP is growing scarce across major exchange networks.

Legal expert Bill Morgan dismissed the idea of a looming supply shock, citing the abundance of circulating tokens. He noted, “Exchange-held XRP equals 15% of total supply and 25% of circulating supply, far from scarce.”

Morgan also challenged the impact of ETFs, which together hold less than 1% of the total XRP supply today. He concluded the market has not met the conditions required for a supply-driven price surge.

The post XRP Price in 2026 Could Rise on Locked Supply, Not Network Usage appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.9889
$1.9889$1.9889
+3.66%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41