For decades, the most valuable tech companies in the world remained effectively inaccessible. Hecto's Ultan Miller says that era is over.For decades, the most valuable tech companies in the world remained effectively inaccessible. Hecto's Ultan Miller says that era is over.

Before the IPO: How Hecto is turning the largest private companies into public tokens

2026/01/06 04:02
6 min read

For decades, the most valuable technology companies in the world remained effectively inaccessible. Retail investors showed up only after IPOs, institutions traded exposure quietly through opaque secondary markets, and a small circle of insiders set valuations. The pre-IPO market itself evolved slowly. Ultan Miller thinks that era is over.

Summary
  • Hecto is building a tokenized pre-IPO index that bundles exposure to seven private mega-caps—OpenAI, SpaceX, ByteDance, xAI, Stripe, Tether, and Anthropic.
  • The company wants to give investors on-chain access to companies that traditionally stayed behind closed doors until IPOs.
  • The index runs on Canton, an institutional blockchain that enables privacy, compliance, and programmable settlement.

As CEO of Hecto, and managing partner at FCA-regulated digital asset advisory firm Saxon, Miller sits at the crossroads of venture capital, crypto infrastructure, and institutional finance. He’s advised more than $300 million worth of blockchain and fintech transactions, invested millions of his own capital into early-stage tech, and built companies on both sides of the venture table. Now, he’s aiming higher—literally redefining how the next generation of mega-cap companies is accessed, priced, and owned.

Hecto is building what it calls the world’s first tokenized pre-IPO index, launching on Canton, the institutional blockchain backed by some of Wall Street’s biggest names. Its inaugural product bundles exposure to seven of the most powerful private companies on the planet—OpenAI, SpaceX, ByteDance, xAI, Stripe, Tether, and Anthropic—into a single on-chain instrument.

In Miller’s framing, these aren’t unicorns or even decacorns. They’re “Hectocorns”: private companies valued north of $100 billion that now define an era of AI-driven, capital-intensive innovation.

The premise is simple but radical: if public markets once told the story of a generation, today’s defining companies are being built—and staying private—long before an IPO ever arrives. Tokenization, Miller argues, is the missing bridge.

So how do you turn seven of the world’s most secretive companies into a single, investable token? And what happens if the AI boom stumbles, hardware bets sour, or SpaceX finally goes public?

We sat down with Miller to unpack the mechanics, the macro thesis, and why Hecto believes the pre-IPO market is about to move at internet speed.

How does one release a token that combines seven Hectocorns?

Miller: Each token represents exposure to a basket of seven late-stage private companies, with predefined weights, transparent valuation methodology, and institutional-grade controls. Investors mint the token by depositing capital into a dedicated vault, after which the protocol issues a series token whose value tracks the aggregated performance of the underlying basket. Operating on Canton enables privacy-preserving settlement, configurable permissioning, and compliance-ready workflows that are not feasible on public blockchains.

Operationally, the token functions as a programmable wrapper around diversified pre-IPO exposure, secured by Canton’s shared ledger and synchronisation layer. This approach allows investors to access multiple high-growth private companies through a single on-chain instrument, combining the flexibility of tokenization with the legal, operational, and risk-management standards expected by institutional market participants.

Is your team confident that an AI/tech bubble won’t burst in 26?

Miller: The team does not believe there is a discrete AI or technology “bubble” that is destined to burst in 2026. The current cycle is viewed less as speculative excess and more as a structural shift driven by real revenue growth, productivity gains, and sustained institutional adoption across AI and advanced technology. From that perspective, volatility is possible, but the underlying fundamentals do not resemble past bubble dynamics built purely on leverage or retail speculation. A potential IPO of SpaceX is also expected to inject meaningful liquidity into late-stage private markets, improving price discovery and setting public-market benchmarks that can positively re-rate comparable companies.

On the macro side, the outlook assumes a supportive liquidity environment. Expectations of continued monetary-policy easing and prospective U.S. Federal Reserve rate cuts are historically favorable for long-duration and risk assets. In parallel, mechanisms such as Reserve Management Purchases (RMP) effectively act as liquidity support for the financial system, even when not framed as traditional quantitative easing. Taken together, these factors underpin a view that the environment remains constructive for technology and AI assets, without relying on the assumption of an unsustainable bubble narrative.

Can companies be added to the token?

Miller: Yes. The index is designed to be dynamic, while remaining rules-based and transparent. If a constituent such as SpaceX exits the index following a liquidity event, the proceeds from that realization are not simply held idle. Instead, they are directed into a dedicated liquidity pool used to buy back the index token from the market, directly benefiting remaining holders and closing the value-capture loop at the index level.

Holders of the HECTO governance token vote on index composition changes as well as the launching of new indices. 

Regarding xAI: Critics and short-sellers argue that xAI’s heavy investment in GPUs (like Nvidia’s H100s) is a bet on hardware that may become obsolete within five years, potentially leaving the company with a balance sheet full of rapidly depreciating assets. Is this a concern? 

Miller: From Hecto’s perspective, this is not an idiosyncratic balance-sheet risk that the investor is being asked to underwrite directly. Hecto is designed as a passive index exposure, not a vehicle for underwriting operational decisions at the single-company level. The objective is to provide diversified access to leading AI and technology companies, including xAI, rather than to take a view on whether a specific GPU generation—such as **NVIDIA**’s H100s—will depreciate faster than expected.

At the index level, heavy investment in compute is viewed as a feature of the current AI infrastructure phase rather than a red flag. Capital intensity and hardware refresh cycles are common across frontier AI players, and their economic value is realized through deployed compute, software leverage, and downstream monetization, not residual hardware value. By structuring exposure as a basket rather than a single-name bet, Hecto allows investors to participate in the sector’s upside while diluting company-specific execution risks, including those related to hardware obsolescence.

What are the 2026 expectations of such a token? 

Miller: Expectations for 2026 are framed less around short-term narratives and more around macro conditions. Our view is that markets are primarily driven by global liquidity and U.S. Federal Reserve policy, rather than by isolated sector-specific fears. A backdrop of easing financial conditions, declining policy rates, and ongoing liquidity support is historically constructive for high-quality risk-on assets, particularly those with long-duration growth profiles.

Within that environment, a diversified Hectocorn index token is expected to benefit disproportionately. Late-stage technology and AI companies tend to re-rate when capital becomes more abundant and risk appetite improves, while index construction mitigates single-company volatility. As a result, we see 2026 as a potentially favorable period for a passive, quality-filtered technology index, assuming global liquidity remains supportive and policy direction continues to favor risk assets.

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01496
$0.01496$0.01496
-0.39%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00