The post Polymarket trader lost $2.36M in just 8 days over these bad bets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A Polymarket trader has burned through $2.36 millionThe post Polymarket trader lost $2.36M in just 8 days over these bad bets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A Polymarket trader has burned through $2.36 million

Polymarket trader lost $2.36M in just 8 days over these bad bets

A Polymarket trader has burned through $2.36 million in eight days. According to trade records reviewed by market tracker Lookonchain, the losses accumulated after the trader placed 53 separate predictions in US sports leagues and college football.

Lookonchain reported on X that the trader using the pseudonym bossoskil1 recorded 25 winning trades and 28 losing trades during the eight-day period. Although they counted a win rate of 47.2%, the profits were insufficient given the size of the bets lost.

Polymarket trader looks for solace in sports prediction markets

Bossoskil1’s put money on NFL, NBA, NHL, and NCAA football and settled bets on spread-based contracts.

Bossoskil1 bought contracts priced between 40 cents and 60 cents at times, which could mean their confidence in the positions was moderate at best. But even with that pricing, the bets exceeded $200,000 and in several cases surpassed $1 million.

One of the largest losing positions was an NFL bet on Sunday’s clash between the Green Bay Packers and the Chicago Bears. The trader purchased more than 2.5 million shares at 54 cents, and when the position settled at zero, the loss exceeded $1.36 million.

Another loss came from a Bills versus Jaguars spread, in which bossoskil1 backed the Jaguars with over 2.6 million shares at 54 cents, but the NFL team lost by 3 and took his losses to $1.41 million. 

They also put money on the Eagles to beat the 49ers and the Chargers to beat the Patriots. The Eagles lost $304,000, and the Chargers lost $2,700, respectively.

Bossoskil1 wagered six figures on the NHL’s Chicago Blackhawks against the Edmonton Oilers resulting in an $8,500 loss, and on the Columbus Blue Jackets against the Vegas Golden Knights where they lost $2,600.

Some NHL odds made more than 100% returns, such as winning bets on the Devils, Kraken, and Blackhawks in different games. A college football spread bet on Miami made more than $500,000, and an NFL spread bet on the Rams made more than $730,000.

However, these wins were outpaced by larger losing positions, and by the end of the period, the trader’s account balance had realized losses totaling $2.36 million. 

Active positions on Polymarket for trader bossoskil1. Source: Polymarket

As of the time of this reporting, the account still has several positions active, including an NHL wager on the New York Islanders of about 520,000 shares at 49 cents, an exposure of about $255,000. The trader also held a position backing the Chicago Blackhawks against the Washington Capitals with more than 1.65 million shares amounting to $744,000.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/polymarket-trader-lost-2-36m-in-8-days/

Market Opportunity
Bad Idea AI Logo
Bad Idea AI Price(BAD)
$0.00000000133
$0.00000000133$0.00000000133
0.00%
USD
Bad Idea AI (BAD) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15