The post Trump Files $5B JPMorgan Lawsuit Over Jan. 6 Debanking appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Donald Trump has filed a sweeping $5 billion lawsuitThe post Trump Files $5B JPMorgan Lawsuit Over Jan. 6 Debanking appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Donald Trump has filed a sweeping $5 billion lawsuit

Trump Files $5B JPMorgan Lawsuit Over Jan. 6 Debanking

President Donald Trump has filed a sweeping $5 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase and CEO Jamie Dimon, accusing the country’s largest bank of politically motivated debanking in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 unrest.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday morning in Florida state court in Miami by attorney Alejandro Brito, alleges that JPMorgan abruptly and “without warning or remedy” terminated multiple accounts tied to Trump and his hospitality businesses despite the president banking with the institution for decades and conducting “hundreds of millions of dollars” in transactions.

Bank’s Code of Conduct at Center of Complaint

The filing leans heavily on JPMorgan’s own code of conduct, which pledges the bank operates with “the highest level of integrity and ethical conduct” and maintains zero tolerance for unethical behavior.

Trump’s legal team argues that the bank violated those principles by shutting down accounts on Feb. 19, 2021, providing only two months’ notice before closure and no recourse or appeal process. Brito said the day “forever altered the dynamic of the parties’ relationship,” contending the closures came “without warning or provocation.”

The lawsuit also claims that the accounts at issue were in good standing, fully compliant, and actively used, making their termination both “unlawful” and “politically motivated.”

Alleged Blacklisting and Industry-Wide Implications

One of the most explosive allegations is that JPMorgan placed Trump, the Trump Organization, affiliated businesses, and members of the Trump family on an internal blacklist shared among federally regulated banks. The list, the lawsuit says, is typically used for individuals with histories of malfeasance or noncompliance.

The lawsuit calls the alleged inclusion of Trump’s entities “an intentional and malicious falsehood,” claiming it induced other financial institutions to refuse service as well.

Trump’s Public Tease and Banking Fallout

Trump previewed the lawsuit days earlier on Truth Social, saying he would sue JPMorgan for “incorrectly and inappropriately DEBANKING me after the January 6th Protest” and again insisting the 2020 election “was RIGGED.”

Trump’s post (Source: Truth Social)

He has previously stated that JPMorgan gave him a narrow window to move “hundreds of millions of dollars” in early 2021 and that Bank of America later refused to accept large deposits, further restricting his access to traditional banking channels.

JPMorgan Denies Political Motives, Points to Regulatory Pressure

JPMorgan spokesperson Trish Wexler reiterated the bank’s position that “no one’s account should ever be closed because of political or religious beliefs,” adding that the bank supports the current administration’s efforts to address political debanking concerns.

CEO Jamie Dimon has also rejected claims of political targeting, telling lawmakers in 2025, “We don’t debank people because of political or religious affiliations.” He said regulatory burdens, not ideology, are often responsible for account terminations and that “rules and requirements are so onerous” they can inadvertently force debanking.

Other major bank leaders have echoed that sentiment. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, pressed on Trump’s allegations in 2025, simply said: “You’d have to talk to him about that.”

A New Layer: JPMorgan’s Evolving Crypto Posture

In the years since the alleged debanking, Trump family businesses have increasingly experimented with crypto-based fundraising, NFT ventures, and blockchain-driven projects, citing concerns about reliance on traditional banking infrastructure. 

The lawsuit arrives at a time when JPMorgan’s stance on digital assets is undergoing a dramatic shift.

For years, Dimon was among the most outspoken critics of Bitcoin, calling it a “fraud,” dismissing it as a “pet rock,” and even saying governments should “shut it down.” 

But by late 2025, Dimon acknowledged he was “wrong” about aspects of the technology, saying blockchain and stablecoins are real, “legitimate,” and central to the future of finance.

Simultaneously, JPMorgan has begun offering clients exposure to Bitcoin, is exploring crypto trading for institutional clients, and plans to allow Bitcoin and Ether as collateral for loans — a stark contrast to its earlier hostility toward the asset class.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13968/trump-takes-jp-morgan-to-court-5-b-lawsuit-alleges-post-jan-6-debanking

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00