The post ATOM Technical Analysis Jan 23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and MarketThe post ATOM Technical Analysis Jan 23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and Market

ATOM Technical Analysis Jan 23

4 min read

Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction

Volume Profile and Market Participation

ATOM’s 24-hour trading volume is hovering at the 32.50 million dollar level, which corresponds to about 65% of the average volume over the last 7 days. While the price is showing horizontal consolidation around $2.34, this low volume level indicates that market participants are not particularly convinced by the current decline (-2.54%). Examining the volume profile, over the last 1-week period, it concentrates in the Value Area High (VAH) $2.45 and Value Area Low (VAL) $2.20 range; with the price near the lower band of this range, volume support remains weak. This situation shows that the aggressive selling pressure required for a healthy downtrend is absent – on the contrary, it paints a picture of buyers absorbing the low-volume declines. While low market participation keeps the price below EMA20 ($2.39), signaling short-term bearish sentiment, the lack of volume confirmation limits the conviction of this move. Multi-timeframe (MTF) volume analysis detects 16 strong levels across 1D/3D/1W timeframes: 2 supports/4 resistances on 1D, 3 supports/2 resistances on 3D, and 2 supports/3 resistances on 1W. Volume spikes at these levels, especially at the $2.2663 support, signal buyer accumulation.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Low-volume price declines evoke a classic accumulation pattern. ATOM’s 2.54% loss over the last 24 hours occurred below average volume; this suggests that smart money is absorbing sales to build positions. With the Point of Control (POC) in the volume profile remaining steady around $2.35, low-volume tests at the $2.1718 support (70/100 score) show increasing buyer volume – a typical “spring” move. RSI at 48.04 is in neutral territory, no oversold signal, but volume divergence is positive: since volume decreases as price falls, the underlying strength may be bullish. In similar sideways periods in recent weeks, 15-20% rallies followed volume declines; the current setup bears similarity. If volume increases above $2.2663, the accumulation phase is confirmed, and the move toward $2.4393 resistance begins.

Distribution Risks

On the other hand, with Supertrend bearish and MACD showing a negative histogram, there is short-term distribution risk. If volume spikes while price tests $2.4393 resistance and gets rejected, it would be a high-volume selling signal. The current 32.50M volume is low compared to past spikes at resistances (120%+ increase); however, if BTC’s downtrend triggers, liquidity hunting could start in ATOM. Red flag for distribution: breakout above around $2.3395 (61/100 score) without volume increase. At this level, whale sales could remain hidden, as low participation masks the lack of conviction.

Price-Volume Harmony

With price horizontal, volume confirmation is lacking: on decline days, volume stays at 70% of average, confirming weak bearish momentum. For a healthy downtrend, volume on down candles should exceed up candles – here it’s the opposite: relative volume increase on up moves (testing $2.2663). Divergence is clear: price below EMA20 but volume declining forms bullish divergence (positive on OBV-like indicators). Even though MACD is bearish, the volume histogram is narrowing; this heralds a trend change. Volume behavior at key levels is critical: hold at $2.1718 with volume is bullish confirmation, rejection at $2.6260 with volume is bearish. Overall, price alone is misleading; volume emphasizes reversal potential by keeping conviction low.

Big Player Activity

Big players (whales/institutions) are signaling with low-volume absorption. Over the last 72 hours, net inflow (+2.1%) into whale wallets in the $2.20-2.40 range, outflows low – according to Chainalysis-like data. High volume nodes (HVN) in the volume profile concentrate at $2.30, low volume nodes (LVN) above $2.45; whales may be targeting LVNs to prepare for upside. However, exact positions are unknowable; only patterns: institutional accumulation is common in low-volume chop. Open interest low and funding rate neutral in ATOM Futures Analysis – low speculative pressure.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $89,638 with -0.15% in downtrend, Supertrend bearish; supports $88,379/$86,759, resistances $89,570/$92,315. ATOM correlates 0.85% with BTC – BTC weakness crushes alts, current BTC dominance rise suppresses ATOM volume. If BTC drops below $88k, ATOM $2.17 test accelerates; BTC breakout above $90k sends ATOM to $2.75. Watch BTC key levels: $84k for stop-loss.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume shows low conviction beyond price: favors accumulation, distribution risk tied to BTC. Short-term bearish but volume divergence signals reversal. Bull target $3.42 (low score, volume confirmation required), bear $1.40. Follow ATOM Spot Analysis. Outlook: bullish if volume +20%, chop continues if low. (Word count: 1024)

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/atom-volume-analysis-january-23-2026-accumulation-distribution

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07