Nasdaq crypto options remove position limits on Bitcoin and Ether ETF options, aligning with commodity ETFs and boosting hedging efficiency.Nasdaq crypto options remove position limits on Bitcoin and Ether ETF options, aligning with commodity ETFs and boosting hedging efficiency.

Nasdaq crypto options rule shift removes limits for major Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs

nasdaq crypto options

In a move with broad implications for derivatives markets, Nasdaq crypto options are set for a major structural shift after a new rule filing with the US regulator.

Nasdaq proposal to lift caps on Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF options

Nasdaq has formally asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to eliminate position limits on options tied to spot Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded funds listed on its venue. The proposal removes the 25,000-contract ceiling that previously capped how many options a single market participant could hold.

The rule change covers options linked to spot Bitcoin ETF and Ether ETF products from major issuers including BlackRock, Fidelity, Bitwise, Grayscale, ARK/21Shares, and VanEck. All of these ETFs trade on Nasdaq and had been subject to identical contract caps.

Nasdaq filed its proposal on January 7. However, the SEC chose to waive its standard 30-day waiting period and allowed the rule change to become effective immediately on January 22, accelerating implementation for the crypto options market.

The regulator can still suspend the amendment within 60 days of that date if it determines that extended review is warranted. Moreover, the agency has opened a public comment period and expects to issue a final determination by late February, leaving a window for further regulatory input.

Equal treatment with other commodity-based ETF options

Options give traders the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an underlying asset at a specified price before a set expiration date. Historically, exchanges applied position limits to such contracts to curb excessive speculation and reduce the risk of market manipulation.

Nasdaq argues that removing the cap on these digital asset-linked contracts will align them with options on other commodity-based ETFs, which typically do not face similar position limits. The exchange says this consistent treatment across asset classes improves market efficiency without increasing systemic risk.

According to the filing, the change is designed to advance fair and orderly markets, uphold just trading principles, and support an open, competitive environment. Furthermore, Nasdaq claims the updated framework does not impose any undue burden on competition and will instead enhance investor choice in crypto-linked derivatives.

The move also builds on the exchange’s earlier regulatory approvals. In late 2025, Nasdaq secured permission to list options on single-asset crypto ETFs structured as commodity-based trusts. That earlier decision allowed trading in Bitcoin and Ether ETF options but left position and exercise limits in place at the time.

Previous efforts to expand Bitcoin ETF options capacity

Before the blanket removal of position limits, Nasdaq had already sought incremental flexibility for specific products. In November, the exchange filed a separate proposal to raise the position limit on BlackRock‘s iShares Bitcoin Trust options, trading under the ticker IBIT, from 250,000 contracts to 1 million contracts.

That earlier request cited rising institutional and retail demand for bitcoin etf options. It also argued that the existing cap constrained effective hedging, particularly for large liquidity providers and professional firms seeking to manage risk in rapidly growing spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Market participants expect other US options venues to follow Nasdaq’s approach and pursue comparable filings. However, any parallel proposals will also require SEC review, and a coordinated framework would help standardize how crypto ETF regulation is applied across exchanges for these products.

Market impact and options open interest data

The impact of the new framework is already visible in trading metrics. BlackRock‘s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) options currently rank 11th among all US-listed assets by options open interest, reflecting a significant build-up in institutional activity.

OpenCharts data shows that options tied to IBIT now account for more than 5.3 million contracts in open interest. That said, IBIT-listed derivatives still sit below gold and silver ETFs, highlighting that traditional commodity funds remain ahead in overall options depth despite the rapid rise of crypto-linked products.

Flows into the underlying spot ETFs have been mixed. Over the last three days, US Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows totaling $1.58 billion, signaling some profit-taking or repositioning by investors. Moreover, these flows arrived even as derivatives activity continued to expand.

BlackRock’s IBIT led redemptions with $356.6 million withdrawn over that period, while Fidelity‘s FBTC saw outflows of $287.7 million. Despite this, the robust options market suggests that hedging and speculative strategies around these funds remain in high demand.

Bitcoin and Ethereum price backdrop

The derivatives changes come against a backdrop of renewed volatility in underlying crypto prices. As of the latest available data, Bitcoin traded near $90,000, up 1% over the previous 24 hours, reflecting a continued bullish tone in spot markets.

Ethereum also gained 1% to trade around $3,000 after having fallen more than 11% over the preceding week. However, the rebound suggests some traders are rebuilding positions, which could further support liquidity in both spot and ether etf options markets.

Market structure specialists note that higher volatility often boosts demand for calls and puts as traders seek leverage or protection. Consequently, removing position limits may allow larger institutional strategies that previously faced operational constraints on Nasdaq’s options platform.

Broader implications for Nasdaq crypto options infrastructure

The latest Nasdaq rule change forms part of a broader effort by the exchange to expand its digital asset infrastructure. Over recent years, Nasdaq has launched initiatives around tokenized equities and unified crypto indexes, reinforcing its ambition to be a central venue for regulated crypto-linked products.

In this context, the decision to remove position limits on nasdaq crypto options tied to Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs signals a maturation of the asset class inside mainstream financial market plumbing. Moreover, it underscores the growing alignment between traditional equity and commodity derivatives rules and their digital asset counterparts.

Looking ahead, analysts expect this framework to support larger institutional participation, more sophisticated hedging, and tighter spreads in bitcoin etf options and related products. If the SEC’s final decision in late February confirms the current relief, Nasdaq could further cement its role as a key hub for regulated crypto derivatives in the United States.

In summary, the SEC’s swift handling of Nasdaq’s filing, the rapid growth in IBIT open interest, and the evolving spot flows in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs collectively highlight how fast crypto-linked markets are converging with traditional derivatives infrastructure.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00