TLDR: Silver surged 450% to $120 adding $6 trillion in market cap amid five-year supply deficit of 678 million ounces.  China export restrictions tightened globalTLDR: Silver surged 450% to $120 adding $6 trillion in market cap amid five-year supply deficit of 678 million ounces.  China export restrictions tightened global

Silver Hits $120: Why the Metal Is Exploding Like Never Seen Before in History

2026/01/30 09:36
4 min read

TLDR:

  • Silver surged 450% to $120 adding $6 trillion in market cap amid five-year supply deficit of 678 million ounces. 
  • China export restrictions tightened global supply with Shanghai silver at $127 creating record premiums over markets. 
  • Paper-to-physical leverage at 350:1 triggered forced buying as delivery requests exposed severe physical shortages. 
  • Lease rates spiked to 39% while backwardation emerged signaling worst physical stress since 1980 silver crisis.

Silver prices have exploded to $120 per ounce, representing a 450% surge over two years. This historic rally added over $6 trillion to silver’s total market capitalization.

The metal now stands as the world’s best-performing asset across all categories. Multiple structural factors converged simultaneously to create this unprecedented price movement. Supply deficits, export restrictions, and paper market failures combined to fuel the explosion.

Unprecedented Supply Crisis Drives Historic Price Action

The current silver explosion stems from years of accumulated deficits rather than temporary imbalances. Bull Theory explained that global consumption exceeded production for five consecutive years before prices began accelerating.

According to the analysis, total shortages reached 678 million ounces during this period. This deficit represents almost one complete year of worldwide mine output missing from available supply.

China’s export restrictions intensified the supply crisis to historic levels. The country controls major portions of global refined silver through processing operations.

New licensing requirements drastically reduced the amount of metal permitted to leave Chinese borders. Physical silver inside China became increasingly scarce as Shanghai prices climbed to $127. Bull Theory noted that this premium over international markets demonstrates the severity of internal shortages.

Industrial demand growth reached levels never previously witnessed in silver markets. Solar panel manufacturing now consumes massive quantities for electrical conductivity requirements.

The report indicates annual solar demand expanding from 200 million ounces to 450 million ounces by 2030. Data center construction, artificial intelligence infrastructure, and grid electrification created additional pressure. These sectors cannot easily substitute silver due to its superior conductive properties.

The paper market’s leverage ratio exposed systemic vulnerabilities at unprecedented scales. Current estimates place paper-to-physical ratios at 350:1 across trading platforms.

Bull Theory highlighted that for every single physical ounce, there are 350 ounces in paper claims. Increased physical delivery demands triggered forced buying as shorts scrambled for metal. This created a self-reinforcing loop pushing prices higher at accelerating rates.

Market Dislocation Reaches Historic Extremes

Lease rates spiked to 39% annualized, indicating the most severe borrowing stress in decades. Normal market conditions maintain rates near zero for precious metals lending.

The explosion to 39% revealed extreme difficulty accessing physical inventory for delivery obligations. Borrowing costs at these levels appeared only during previous historic crises.

Backwardation emerged across silver futures as spot prices exceeded forward contracts. This inversion signals desperate demand for immediate physical delivery over future promises.

Bull Theory observed that market participants last witnessed similar backwardation patterns around 1980 during that era’s silver crisis. The reappearance confirmed structural breakdown in normal supply relationships.

Refining capacity losses compounded the supply explosion by removing 9.7% of global processing ability. Even available raw silver could not transform into deliverable bars quickly enough.

Exchange-traded funds simultaneously absorbed 95 million ounces in early 2025 alone. This removal from circulation eliminated metal that industries and contract holders desperately needed.

Strategic classification by the United States formalized silver’s critical status in August 2025. Government recognition of supply vulnerabilities marked a historic shift from commodity to strategic resource.

Combined with multi-year deficits, Chinese export controls, industrial demand surges, paper leverage collapse, extreme lease rates, backwardation, refinery shutdowns, and ETF absorption, physical scarcity replaced paper pricing.

Bull Theory concluded that the explosion occurred because every major factor aligned simultaneously for the first time in history.

The post Silver Hits $120: Why the Metal Is Exploding Like Never Seen Before in History appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00