When President Donald Trump was weighing his options for a U.S. Federal Reserve nominee to replace the current chairman, Jerome Powell — whose term ends in May —When President Donald Trump was weighing his options for a U.S. Federal Reserve nominee to replace the current chairman, Jerome Powell — whose term ends in May —

Trump's Fed chair nominee is a 'political animal' and a 'hack': Nobel economist

When President Donald Trump was weighing his options for a U.S. Federal Reserve nominee to replace the current chairman, Jerome Powell — whose term ends in May — his search was described as a "tale of two Kevins": National Economic Policy (NEC) Director Kevin Hassett, and financier/attorney Kevin Warsh (who served on the Fed's Board of Governors under former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama).

Trump announced his decision early Friday morning, January 30, nominating Warsh rather than Hassett.

Liberal economist Paul Krugman analyzes Trump's Warsh pick in a January 30 column posted on Substack, and he isn't enthusiastic. The former New York Times columnist views Warsh as a "political" partisan who won't serve the Fed well.

"The Fed is a republic, not a dictatorship; key decisions are made by a committee in which the chairperson has only one vote," Krugman explains. "Fed chairs can only drive policy through persuasion — and Warsh lacks the intellectual and moral credibility to be effective on that score. But God help us if we enter a crisis that requires decisive Fed leadership, the kind Fed Chair Ben Bernanke showed during the financial crisis, or Jay Powell is now showing against Trump's attacks."

Krugman adds, "Absent a crisis, my prediction is that the majority of Warsh's colleagues will largely ignore him, albeit without expressing their contempt openly…. While I don't think Warsh will do too much damage to monetary policy, he, along with his fellow Trumper Michelle Bowman, the vice chair for financial supervision, may well eviscerate the Fed's role as a financial regulator."

The Nobel laureate economist disagrees with reporters who are describing Warsh as a "monetary hawk."

"That's a category error," Krugman writes. "Warsh is a political animal. He calls for tight money and opposes any attempt to boost the economy when Democrats hold the White House. Like all Trumpers, he has been all for lower interest rates since November 2024. Depressingly, some Democratic-leaning economists are stepping up to reassure us about Warsh's qualifications. This is reminiscent of the way many economists rallied around the selection of Kevin Hassett as chair of the Council of Economic Advisers in 2017, although he was an obviously ludicrous hack."

Krugman describes Warsh as a "Republican loyalist" who "always wants to slam the economic brakes when Democrats are in power and step on the gas when Republicans rule."

"It's a humiliating day for the Federal Reserve, which has always prided itself on its professionalism and has been hugely respected around the world," Krugman laments. "But even the Fed can't insulate itself from the derangement sweeping America."

Paul Krugman's full Substack column is available at this link.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What is the best way for a teenager to start investing?

What is the best way for a teenager to start investing?

This article helps parents and teenagers understand how to start investing as a teenager, with clear explanations of legal account options, basic tax issues, sensible
Share
Coinstats2026/01/31 05:14
United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K

United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K

The post United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 05:36
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02