FCA CP26/4 sets out new UK crypto rules covering Consumer Duty, safeguarding, complaints, and stricter requirements for international crypto firm.FCA CP26/4 sets out new UK crypto rules covering Consumer Duty, safeguarding, complaints, and stricter requirements for international crypto firm.

UK’s FCA sets out stricter crypto rules in CP26/4 proposal

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority has published Consultation Paper CP26/4, which outlines how its regulatory handbook will apply to firms carrying out newly regulated cryptoasset activities. The proposals outline standards of conduct, consumer protections, rules on safeguarding, and expectations for international firms looking to access the UK market. 

Under CP26/4, the FCA has proposed that the Consumer Duty be applied to crypto firms in the same way as it is for other authorized firms. As a result, firms that serve retail customers would have to show fair value, transparent disclosures, and effective consumer support. However, the Duty would not apply to trading between participants on a UK authorized qualifying cryptoasset trading platform.

The FCA’s draft guidance outlines who qualifies as a product manufacturer in crypto markets. Issuers of qualifying cryptoassets or stablecoins, crypto lending and borrowing platforms, and UK trading platforms would be included in that category.

Complaints, ombudsman oversight, and limits on compensation

CP26/4 confirms that crypto firms would be subject to the standard complaint-handling rules of the FCA. Formal procedures and strict response timelines would be in place, bringing crypto firms into line with established financial services practices.

The proposals would also include crypto activities under the Financial Ombudsman Service. The ombudsman would be able to issue binding awards of up to GBP350,000, providing the consumer with redress that many crypto firms have not yet offered. At the same time, the regulator does not intend to extend the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to crypto activities. Customers would not be compensated for investment losses if a crypto firm fails.

Safeguarding, reporting, and a higher bar for global firms

The consultation also alters the way client cryptoassets must be protected. Firms that deal, operate trading platforms, issue stablecoins, or provide custody could be subject to the FCA’s client asset rules. Client money would be segregated and protected under a statutory trust, similar to traditional finance requirements.

Notably, the FCA has proposed to apply its new regime of safeguarding to both qualifying cryptoassets and security tokens. Training and competence standards would also apply to retail clients for staff, although no mandatory qualifications are envisaged.

For governance, CP26/4 includes thresholds for increased supervision under the Senior Manager and Certification Regime. Large stablecoin issuers and custodians holding assets above certain levels would have increased compliance requirements.

International firms are subject to clearer location expectations. The FCA proposes that most firms serving UK clients operate through a UK legal entity. Limited flexibility may be required for trading platforms that need access to global liquidity, but the overall approach is tighter than for non-crypto firms. The consultation also points out that the Prudential Regulation Authority can take similar expectations of systemic stablecoin issuers.

In addition, the FCA has also opened a consultation on CP26/4 until 12 March 2026. Final rules are anticipated later in 2026, with an authorization gateway in September 2026 and the regime coming into force in October 2027.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Nvidia Partners with Former Crypto Miner Nscale for UK AI Infrastructure Project

Nvidia Partners with Former Crypto Miner Nscale for UK AI Infrastructure Project

TLDR Nvidia announced a $683 million investment in Nscale, a UK AI infrastructure company that spun off from crypto miner Arkon Energy in May 2024 The partnership aims to scale the UK’s AI capacity to 60,000 GPUs by 2026 as part of the government’s national AI infrastructure push Nscale is part of the “neocloud” industry [...] The post Nvidia Partners with Former Crypto Miner Nscale for UK AI Infrastructure Project appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 16:24
XRP’s Biggest Drawback Uncovered by Top Analyst, It Is Not Price

XRP’s Biggest Drawback Uncovered by Top Analyst, It Is Not Price

The post XRP’s Biggest Drawback Uncovered by Top Analyst, It Is Not Price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP, within the week, dipped below the psychological $3 level again and shed 6.21% in the last seven days. This long, drawn-out consolidation has raised concerns among XRP investors. Versan Aljarrah, the founder of Black Swan Capitalist, has shared new insights into the seeming stagnation in the price of the asset. XRP price suppression strategy Aljarrah claims that the low price of XRP is not a weakness in the momentum of the asset. Rather, it is due to major institutions intentionally suppressing it for their own interest. According to him, these powerful traditional institutions are looking to stockpile XRP at this low price, hence the deliberate suppression. We agree, #XRP isn’t stuck, it’s being stalled, the strategic value alone confirms it, If the dollar is overextended and liquidity is strained as a result, XRP is the alternative source and bridge that provides liquidity for institutions, Thats how it becomes the solution. https://t.co/ZadNEIUhhk — Black Swan Capitalist (@VersanAljarrah) September 19, 2025 Aljarrah appears aligned with the views of Jim Willie, who alleged that big banks, including BlackRock, the asset manager, are actively accumulating the asset to have leverage when the price soars to over $7-$8, where it ought to be at this point. Both views imply that there is a deliberate conspiracy going on that involves the manipulation of XRP’s price. Aljarrah and Willie maintain that this is deliberate so that these powerful financial institutions can buy it cheaply before it gains adoption in the traditional finance space. “If the U.S. dollar is overextended and liquidity is strained as a result, XRP is the alternative source and bridge that provides liquidity for institutions,” Aljarrah wrote. The Black Swan Capitalist founder believes XRP could serve as a “bridge currency” that supplies liquidity for global transactions when the U.S. fiat currency faces stress. XRP…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/21 04:16
Top 5 News This Week: Senators vs. Chinese embassy; Rodrigo Duterte and ICC

Top 5 News This Week: Senators vs. Chinese embassy; Rodrigo Duterte and ICC

The Philippines' top news stories from January 25 to 31, 2026
Share
Rappler2026/01/31 20:00