TLDR CZ denied Binance dumped $1B in BTC to cause the crypto market drop. Binance’s SAFU fund will shift to BTC over 30 days, says CZ. CZ says Binance wallet changesTLDR CZ denied Binance dumped $1B in BTC to cause the crypto market drop. Binance’s SAFU fund will shift to BTC over 30 days, says CZ. CZ says Binance wallet changes

CZ Rejects Claims Binance Sparked Crypto Crash With $1B Bitcoin Dump

3 min read

TLDR

  • CZ denied Binance dumped $1B in BTC to cause the crypto market drop.
  • Binance’s SAFU fund will shift to BTC over 30 days, says CZ.
  • CZ says Binance wallet changes reflect user withdrawals, not internal sales.
  • Crypto crash blame includes Binance’s role in the October flash crash.

Binance co-founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao has publicly responded to accusations suggesting Binance played a role in the recent cryptocurrency market drop. On Monday, Zhao addressed multiple claims that he called “imaginative FUD,” defending both his statements and the platform’s recent activity.

The term FUD, short for “fear, uncertainty, and doubt,” is commonly used in crypto to describe negative rumors or misinformation. CZ’s comments come amid renewed scrutiny following the sharp sell-off in crypto prices and market volatility over the weekend.

CZ Denies Binance Triggered the Sell-Off

In a detailed post on social platform X, CZ rejected claims that Binance sold $1 billion worth of bitcoin to cause the weekend drop in crypto prices. He said the funds in question were user-owned and not Binance’s holdings.

Binance’s wallet balance only changes when users withdraw,” CZ wrote. “Most users keep their balance with Binance and use Binance as a wallet.”

He also addressed accusations that he alone influenced market sentiment when he said he was “less confident” about the so-called crypto supercycle. Critics suggested this remark contributed to bearish sentiment. CZ dismissed the idea, adding, “If I had that power, I wouldn’t be on Crypto Twitter with you lot.”

SAFU Conversion Plan Defended

Last week, Binance announced it would convert its $1 billion Secure Asset Fund for Users (SAFU) from stablecoins to bitcoin. Critics questioned the timing of the move and raised doubts about whether it added pressure to the market.

CZ explained the purchases would be made over 30 days and not in one transaction. He said Binance, being a centralized exchange with high liquidity, would not use decentralized exchanges for the conversions.

“You won’t see them buying using a DEX,” CZ wrote. “Binance is a CEX with the best liquidity in the world.”

The SAFU fund is designed as a user protection measure and is financed by Binance itself. It was introduced in 2018 to safeguard users’ assets in emergency situations.

Ongoing Tensions Over Flash Crash

CZ’s response follows rising tensions in the crypto community over the causes of the October 10 flash crash. The crash caused an estimated $19 billion in leveraged positions to be wiped out within minutes, triggering broader market disruption.

Rival exchange OKX’s founder, Star Xu, directly blamed Binance for the event. CZ did not address the flash crash in detail in his latest post but emphasized that users are responsible for their trading behavior, not the exchange itself.

He also pointed out that Binance has continued normal operations and that no internal market manipulation took place. Zhao stepped down as Binance CEO in 2023 after a legal settlement with U.S. authorities but remains a visible figure in the crypto space.

Market Confidence and Scrutiny

As the crypto market remains unstable, scrutiny on leading exchanges like Binance continues. Analysts and investors are watching major platform movements for any signs of manipulation or lack of transparency.

CZ’s attempt to clear the air may not settle all concerns, but it underscores the pressure faced by crypto leaders during market downturns. The blame over volatility has intensified across social platforms, even as facts remain unclear.

The post CZ Rejects Claims Binance Sparked Crypto Crash With $1B Bitcoin Dump appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05