TLDR Coinbase has accused Australia’s Big Four banks of systematically denying financial services to legitimate crypto companies. The exchange claims the practiceTLDR Coinbase has accused Australia’s Big Four banks of systematically denying financial services to legitimate crypto companies. The exchange claims the practice

Coinbase Calls Australian Banks’ Actions an ‘Unlawful Regulatory Ban’ on Crypto

3 min read

TLDR

  • Coinbase has accused Australia’s Big Four banks of systematically denying financial services to legitimate crypto companies.
  • The exchange claims the practice of debanking is harming competition and trust in the Australian financial system.
  • Coinbase highlights two main methods used by banks, including unilateral account closures and restrictions on crypto-related transactions.
  • The company argues that such practices disproportionately target the fintech sector and businesses utilizing blockchain technology.
  • In 2021, up to 60% of fintech businesses in Australia were reportedly denied banking services by major banks.

Coinbase has accused Australia’s Big Four banks of systematically denying financial services to legitimate crypto companies. The Nasdaq-listed exchange raised concerns in a submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics. Coinbase described the practice as a threat to competition and trust in the Australian economy.

Coinbase Blasts Banks for ‘Debanking’ Crypto Sector

Coinbase’s submission highlights how Australian banks are using two methods to restrict access to banking services. The first is unilateral account closures, while the second is transaction restrictions on transfers involving digital assets. “These actions, referred to as ‘debanking,’ have evolved into a systemic issue,” the company said.

In its submission, Coinbase called out Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, ANZ, and National Australia Bank for impeding the ability of businesses and consumers to use their own money. The exchange added that such practices unfairly target the fintech sector and those dealing with blockchain technology. “The withdrawal of banking services harms the entire economy,” Coinbase argued.

The Impact of Debanking on Australia’s Financial Landscape

Coinbase emphasized that debanking is hurting Australia’s financial landscape, particularly in the fintech sector. In 2021, it was reported that up to 60% of fintech businesses were denied services by Australian banks. Coinbase warned that such actions could lead to an “unlawful regulatory ban,” potentially shutting legitimate sectors out of the formal economy.

The exchange pointed out that with four major banks controlling most payment rails and transaction accounts, this issue is becoming more widespread. The submission also mentioned that the opacity of these banking decisions is undermining public trust in the Australian financial system. “There is nothing that degrades trust in an economy faster than being told you cannot use your own money,” Coinbase said.

Australian Government Responds to Concerns

In response to these allegations, the Australian government has acknowledged the issue and is moving forward with plans for regulatory reform. New licensing laws are being discussed, aimed at closing gaps in crypto regulation. The Treasury has also said it is working with banks to ensure more transparency and fairness in debanking practices.

The Australian government’s recent focus on improving digital payment systems includes addressing issues like debanking. However, Coinbase has called on lawmakers to enforce transparency measures that banks should follow when debanking customers. These measures, originally recommended by the Council of Financial Regulators, include requiring banks to document reasons for debanking, provide notice before closing accounts, and ensure access to dispute resolution.

As discussions around these regulatory reforms continue, the pressure is mounting on banks to adopt clearer practices. Coinbase’s submission highlights the urgency of addressing these issues, as more crypto companies face increasing challenges in securing essential banking services.

The post Coinbase Calls Australian Banks’ Actions an ‘Unlawful Regulatory Ban’ on Crypto appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19
Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/02/04 01:05