The post Ethereum price struggles near $2,200 as downside risks grow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum price fell toward $2,200 after another wave ofThe post Ethereum price struggles near $2,200 as downside risks grow appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum price fell toward $2,200 after another wave of

Ethereum price struggles near $2,200 as downside risks grow

3 min read

Ethereum price fell toward $2,200 after another wave of selling, with rising volume and weak momentum keeping traders on the defensive.

Summary

  • Ethereum continued to slide as traders reduced risk exposure.
  • Futures data showed rising activity but falling confidence.
  • Technical signals point to limited upside without a strong rebound.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was trading at $2,264, a 2.8% decline over the previous day, further sinking into a vulnerable range. This drop comes after a steep sell-off that has caused ETH to drop across all significant time periods. 

Ethereum (ETH) has fluctuated between $2,120 and $3,034 over the last week, but the trend has been decisively downward. In total, ETH has lost 24% in the past seven days and 28% over the last month, now sitting roughly 54% below its all-time high of $4,946 reached in August 2025.

Trading activity has increased as prices dropped. Ethereum recorded $47.25 billion in spot trading volume over the last 24 hours, up 21%.

Derivatives markets showed a similar pattern. CoinGlass data shows futures volume climbed 38% to $105 billion, while open interest slipped 1.18% to $27 billion. This suggests traders are trimming exposure rather than adding fresh leverage.

On-chain activity raises caution flags

On-chain data has drawn fresh attention. A Feb. 4 report from CryptoQuant contributor CryptoOnchain showed Ethereum’s transfer count, measured using a 14-day moving average, rising to about 1.17 million.

These kinds of spikes have often surfaced during times of increased market stress. Both Jan. 2018 and May 2021 saw similar spikes, which were followed by steep price drops.

While higher transaction counts can signal strong network use, sudden spikes are also linked to large-scale repositioning and distribution during uncertain market phases.

The current data does not confirm a market top. Still, it places Ethereum in a zone where downside risk has historically increased, especially when price momentum is already weak.

Ethereum price technical analysis

From a chart perspective, Ethereum remains locked in a daily downtrend. Lower highs and lower lows have continued to form since the price failed near the $4,000 region. No clear break in structure has yet been established.

Ethereum daily chart. Credit: crypto.news

Repeated pullbacks from the mid-Bollinger Band have reinforced selling pressure. Every rebound attempt has so far run into resistance near the 20-day moving average, with upside momentum fading quickly after each move. This pattern suggests that sellers are still in charge of short-term price movement.

Additionally, Ethereum has fallen below the lower Bollinger Band, indicating an increase in downside volatility. Rather than marking exhaustion, the move suggests that selling pressure is still active within the broader downtrend.

The loss of the $3,000 level has further weakened the structure. Although the price briefly returned above the zone, ETH was unable to hold, and the zone flipped into resistance. Momentum is still muted with the daily relative strength index in the low 30s and minimal signs of a long-term recovery.

A modest recovery could develop if selling slows and price holds above the $2,150–$2,200 area.  However, a more meaningful shift in sentiment would require ETH to reclaim $2,300 and move toward the $2,700–$2,800 range. Without a daily close above those levels, upside attempts are likely to remain shallow and short-lived.

Source: https://crypto.news/ethereum-price-high-risk-zone-on-chain-surge-2026/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
XRPL Adds Institutional Lending and Privacy Tools in Ripple’s 2026 Roadmap

XRPL Adds Institutional Lending and Privacy Tools in Ripple’s 2026 Roadmap

Ripple shared a new Institutional DeFi roadmap showing how the XRP Ledger is being shaped for everyday use by banks, asset managers, and regulated financial firms
Share
Tronweekly2026/02/06 13:00