Uranium markets regained a sense of stability, with the spot prices remaining at high levels, with uranium-related stocks recovering.Uranium markets regained a sense of stability, with the spot prices remaining at high levels, with uranium-related stocks recovering.

Spot Uranium at $85 Indicates Strength as URA Rebounds From $50

2026/02/08 05:10
3 min read

Price action in the sector implied coordinated recovery as opposed to individual action. There was a reset in market data as the market had been volatile.

Uranium Equities Recaptured as Breadth Turns Positive

Recently, X analyst John Quakes said that there was a general recovery of the uranium mining stock based on a deep pullback. His chart indicated that most of the uranium-related equities and ETFs were trading in a favorable position. Earnings have been recorded between minor increases up to robust double-digit growths, showing enhanced engagement in the market.

Uranium equities made a widespread recovery following an unjustified drawback. — X (Feb 2026): John QuakesSource

The recovery was spread among the producers, developers, and exploration companies. Rebounds were recorded by large-cap miners and mid-tier firms. A number of uranium-oriented ETFs and trust funds were trading side by side with equities. This alignment was the indication of capital rotation in the uranium value chain as opposed to the selective positioning.

Quakes also noted better conditions of nuclear fuel supply and demand than they had a week earlier. He said that the contract floor price of U₃O₈ was at its highest point in 18 years.

Not all stocks moved higher. Only a handful of names transacted flat or slightly down. This dispersion was not the issue of the industry but the specifics of the companies. The general market coverage was more in favor of the buyers, as the positive adjustments of prices are predominant on the table.

Spot Uranium Holds $85 as Volatility Eases

According to TradingEconomics data, uranium was trading at a price of $85.25 per pound, which is a decline of 0.53%. The drawback was a response to a sudden volatility spike in the year. Prices were soaring to the area of $100-$102, after which they faced massive pressure to sell.

Spot uranium fell to $85.25 after rebuffing the $100 mark, and the spot uranium went into stabilization after the momentum-held rally. — TradingEconomics (Feb 2026)

Rejection at over $100 led to a quick correction. Uranium prices had fallen back in the mid-$80s, where they are currently being stabilized. At the current levels, even though they are falling daily, they are still much higher than the previous prices in the year.

Over a wider time span, it had a solid upward structure. In the early spring, the prices rose from $63-$65 to higher highs through late 2025. The last rally was preceded by a period of consolidation between the range of about $70 and $75.

URA ETF Rebounds After Testing $50 Support

On the other hand, data provided by TradingView indicated that the Global X Uranium ETF (URA) was trading at the end of the session at a price of $52.16, an increase of 6.21%. The intraday trades were between -$50.12 and -$52.25. Volume was about 5.91 million shares, which means that there is renewed activity around the support.

URA bounced back violently on the support zone of $50, indicating technical reset following the pullback on the highs of the previous $60. — TradingView (Feb 2026)

The recovery came after a pullback of the highs that reached up to around $60-$62; the uranium equities had hit their peak. The fall returned URA to the region of the $50 level.

Momentum indicators had both positive and negative signals. The MACD histogram was also negative, which was a sign of decreasing impetus following the rebound. The Chaikin Money Flow was hovering around the neutral mark, implying that there was no strong accumulation and selling pressure was reduced.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00