The post 21Shares ONDO ETF filing sparks attention, but will it help its price? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. 21Shares’s filing for an ONDO ETF has put theThe post 21Shares ONDO ETF filing sparks attention, but will it help its price? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. 21Shares’s filing for an ONDO ETF has put the

21Shares ONDO ETF filing sparks attention, but will it help its price?

21Shares’s filing for an ONDO ETF has put the spotlight back on the token. Despite ONDO’s price continuing to press near local lows over the past few weeks, exposing a sharp gap between narrative and structure.

Ondo [ONDO] bounced by nearly 8% over the past 24 hours though, pushing the price towards the $0.25-zone. Worth noting though that this rebound corresponded with the rest of the market appreciating on the charts too. Hence, it’s unclear whether the news update had any impact on ONDO. 

In fact, buyers followed market momentum, not fresh ONDO demand. And yet, despite the price bound, it was well below previously lost structural levels at press time, with sellers defending rebounds aggressively. 

Previous attempts to recover higher zones failed quickly too, reinforcing downside control. Volatility expanded briefly during the market-wide surge, then compressed again. Such a behavior signals responsiveness, not accumulation. 

Hence, while the ETF headline lends visibility, broader market conditions continue to drive short-term price movement.

Sellers defend broken structure despite slowing momentum

ONDO’s price remains under pressure as sellers continue to defend previously broken structural levels, keeping downside risk active.

At the time of writing, the daily chart revealed repeated rejection below the $0.356 zone – A level that previously acted as support. After losing that level, the price failed multiple times to reclaim it, confirming supply dominance. 

Here, the $0.20 region stood out as the next major demand zone, aligning with earlier consolidation and long-wick reactions. Therefore, downside risk will remain skewed towards that area if selling resumes. 

The altcoin’s momentum indicators seemed to reinforce and underline its weak follow-throughs too.

Source: TradingView

Leverage thins as traders step aside

Derivatives participation cooled sharply too as traders reduced exposure, instead of pressing directional bets. Total derivatives volume dropped by 40.51% to $227.96 million – Evidence of a sharp contraction in speculative activity. 

At the same time, Open Interest fell by 1.50% to $68.52 million. Such a combination is usually a sign of leverage reduction rather than aggressive positioning. Traders closed positions instead of chasing downside or front-running upside. Therefore, conviction seemed to have faded across derivatives markets. 

However, Open Interest did not collapse outright. That observation hinted at selective disengagement, rather than panic. Liquidity seemed present too, but thinner. What this means is that price movements will require less capital to trigger volatility. 

Source: CoinGlass

Funding tilts bearish as shorts take control

OI-weighted funding flipping negative confirmed growing short-side dominance across ONDO derivatives markets.

At press time, it had a value of near -0.0024%, forcing longs to pay shorts. Such a skew often alludes to traders leaning into downside continuation, rather than rebound scenarios. 

However, funding rarely stays negative for long without consequences. Crowded short positioning often increases sensitivity to upside volatility. 

Meanwhile, the price failed to reclaim its resistance on the charts, validating bearish sentiment. Consequently, funding rates now highlight consensus bias rather than timing signals. They reinforce defensive positioning while quietly increasing volatility risk once price moves decisively. 

Source: CoinGlass

Liquidation zones tighten around price

Finally, the liquidation heatmap revealed dense leverage clusters that define ONDO’s immediate risk boundaries. Heavy short-side liquidity clusters were above $0.27, where leverage were stacked tightly. 

Meanwhile, long liquidations were concentrated between $0.24 and $0.23, with the price trading just above these lower bands. Therefore, a breakdown could trigger cascading long liquidations quickly. However, any sharp rebound towards $0.26 would pressure short positions aggressively. 

Such a structure traps traders inside a narrow volatility corridor. Liquidity hunts become increasingly likely as leverage compresses itself. Consequently, direction matters less than movement. Once price escapes this zone, forced liquidations could accelerate momentum rapidly.

Source: CoinGlass

While the ETF filing has restored visibility to ONDO, the market structure will continue to dictate price behavior.

Repeated rejections below $0.356, collapsing derivatives volumes, and negative funding all point to defensive positioning rather than accumulation. 

At the same time, tight liquidation clustering raises volatility risk without improving directional confidence. Therefore, the market treats the ETF headline as speculative context, not a catalyst. 

Until price reclaims broken structure with participation, ONDO will be exposed to further downside pressure.


Final Thoughts

  • ETF visibility has improved ONDO’s narrative, but price structure will still dictate trader behavior.
  • Defensive positioning implied traders respect downside risk, despite renewed attention and short-term rebounds.
Next: Bitcoin Cash’s rally faces KEY test – Can BCH hold above $500?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/21shares-ondo-etf-filing-sparks-attention-but-will-it-help-its-price/

Market Opportunity
Ondo Logo
Ondo Price(ONDO)
$0.26063
$0.26063$0.26063
+1.51%
USD
Ondo (ONDO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00