Polkadot (DOT) has retreated into its previous trading range following the breakdown from its previous support. The short-term structure has changed from bearishPolkadot (DOT) has retreated into its previous trading range following the breakdown from its previous support. The short-term structure has changed from bearish

Polkadot (DOT) Returns to Trading Range as Bearish Breakdown Loses Strength

2026/02/16 17:00
3 min read

Polkadot (DOT) has retreated into its previous trading range following the breakdown from its previous support. The short-term structure has changed from bearish to consolidative.

The coin is trading between support and resistance levels. The coin needs to break out to determine its direction. The indicators suggest weak momentum.

At the time of writing, Polkadot (DOT) is trading at $1.34, recording a 24-hour trading volume of $190.31 million and a market capitalization of $2.27 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. The DOT decreased by 5.81% over the last 24 hours, reflecting continued selling pressure as the broader crypto market shows mixed movement.

image.pngSource: CoinMarketCap

Polkadot Signals Range Consolidation

A well-known crypto analyst, Alpha Crypto Signal, reported on February 16, 2026, that Polkadot has risen back above its previous breakdown level, thus resuming trading within its horizontal range. This is a sign that the price has changed from a downtrend to a consolidation pattern.

image.pngSource: X

According to Alpha Crypto Signal, as long as the price remains within this channel, the price will continue to oscillate between support and resistance. If the price breaks above the upper boundary, it may indicate more upside. If the price falls below the support level, bearish pressure may return.

Also Read | XRP Surges Toward $1.87 as Federal Reserve Signals Major Crypto Shift

Technical Indicators Continue to Show Weakness

While the range trading has resumed, technical indicators suggest low momentum. The price of DOT is trading near $1.34. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) of DOT is at 29.31, which is lower than the signal line at 32.47. This suggests that the asset is near oversold levels.

The moving average ribbon also reflects the strong downtrend. The stock’s 20-day simple moving average is at $2.21, the 50-day at $3.31, the 100-day at $4.67, and the 200-day at $5.60. Since the stock is trading at much lower levels, the overall trend is still on the downside.

Source: TradingView

This market view is also supported by the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator, as the MACD line remains at -0.618, still below the signal line at -0.584, with the histogram remaining negative at -0.033. This shows that the sellers are still in control of the market.

For now, investors are closely observing whether DOT can hold its support in its range and attempt to recover, or if further losses will cause its price to hit new lows.

Also Read | Cosmos (ATOM) Bounces from Descending Channel Support, Eyes $14.50 Surge

Market Opportunity
Polkadot Logo
Polkadot Price(DOT)
$1.371
$1.371$1.371
+0.21%
USD
Polkadot (DOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

Strategy vergroot BTC voorraad: MSTR aandeel stijgt ondanks druk op Bitcoin koers

De MSTR aandelen van MicroStrategy stegen zondag met ongeveer 10% in 24 uur. Die stijging viel samen met een herstel van de Bitcoin koers. Het bedrijf maakte deze
Share
Coinstats2026/02/16 17:17
RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY

The post RBNZ guidance to support richer NZD – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s EMEA Macro Strategist Geoff Yu expects the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 18:36
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28