Key Takeaways: Pump.Fun briefly lost momentum in July as LetsBonk.Fun gained traction, peaking at over $197 million in daily volume — nearly 4x higher than Pump.Fun at the time. By August, Pump.Fun reclaimed dominance, with volume surging to $191 million compared to $6 million on LetsBonk.Fun. Platform changes such as paybacks and dynamic fees helped attract new meme coin creators back to Pump.Fun. The native PUMP token rose nearly 80% over two weeks, though it still trades about 15% below its all-time high. New contenders like Believe.me, Heaven, and Sugar.me briefly challenged Pump.Fun, but most failed to maintain long-term momentum. In July, rumors started swirling across the crypto community that Pump.Fun was “over” and a new king had emerged: LetsBonk.Fun. The narrative wasn’t entirely baseless. If you looked at trading volumes on meme coin launchpads, LetsBonk clearly started gaining ground throughout the month. At its peak on July 21, LetsBonk.Fun recorded just over $197 million in trading volume, while Pump.Fun sat at around $50 million — a nearly 75% drop by comparison.Source: Dune Doubts about Pump.Fun were amplified by the silence of its official X account and co-founder Alon, especially in the wake of the PUMP token launch. With no major updates or news about the promised airdrop, many in the community began to assume the worst. But the sentiment shift didn’t last long. However, LetsBonk.Fun’s popularity was short-lived. In August, Pump.Fun reclaimed its position as the “king of meme coins.” For comparison, as of Sep. 10, the platform recorded a trading volume of $191 million, while its competitor managed only around $6 million. Did Paybacks Make the Difference? There could be several reasons behind the drop in interest toward LetsBonk.Fun. First, the hype around the platform may have simply faded, which is common in crypto markets. But more importantly, Pump.Fun adjusted its strategy and started offering better incentives to both traders and meme coin creators. One major update was the introduction of payback mechanics. Additionally, the platform added dynamic fees that reward meme coin creators directly. This change made Pump.Fun more appealing for new projects looking to launch their tokens, as creators now have the chance to earn a share of the launch fees. In other words, the platform started sharing its revenue with the community.Source: Pump.Fun’s X account Another important factor is the weekly paybacks in PUMP tokens. These distributions reward token holders regularly, helping boost demand for PUMP and increasing user engagement across the ecosystem. The impact is already visible in the token’s price. According to CoinGecko, PUMP has gained nearly 80% over the past two weeks. At the time of writing, it is just about 15% away from its all-time high (ATH). While many in the community still criticize the token after its initial crash, the recent recovery suggests growing confidence in the project.Source: CoinGecko More Meme Coins and Launchpads Enter the Scene LetsBonk.Fun wasn’t the only one trying to knock Pump.Fun off the throne. Earlier in the summer, there was a wave of hype around Believe.me, a platform built on the concept of Internet Capital Markets (ICM). In simple terms, users can launch meme coins based on an idea or narrative. Some startups joined the platform, including Fitcoin (FITCOIN) — an app focused on wardrobe and outfit suggestions. At the height of its popularity, Believe.me nearly matched Pump.Fun in terms of token launch trading volume.Source: Blackwork Research Despite the short-term success of these challengers, new platforms continue to emerge. In August, a new launchpad called Heaven went live. Learning from previous platforms, it immediately introduced a full 100% payback model. Shortly after launch, Heaven became the second-largest token launchpad after Pump.Fun. On Aug. 9, it accounted for nearly 28% of all new meme coin launches, while Pump.Fun held 63%. LetsBonk.Fun and Believe.me faded into the background with only 1.7% and 0.4%, respectively.Source: Dune Competition That Shapes the Meme Coin Space The growing competition between meme coins is leading to a more dynamic and responsive environment for both creators and traders. As platforms work to attract attention and liquidity, they are adjusting their models, offering new features, and becoming more creator-focused. Even Pump.Fun has made changes, such as introducing paybacks and flexible fee models, to stay ahead. At the same time, the fast pace of new token launches carries risk. Many meme coins are now created with the aim of becoming symbols of their respective platforms. One example is Useless Coin (USELESS) from LetsBonk, which gained rapid popularity earlier in the summer. Its market capitalization exceeded $400 million, with some calling it a possible successor to Fartcoin (FARTCOIN). Since July, USELESS has entered a correction and has not yet returned to its previous highs. A new launchpad, Sugar.me, has also emerged, currently ranking third in terms of launched tokens after Pump.Fun and LetsBonk. LetsBonk, in turn, has managed to reclaim second place, showing that market share in this space can shift quickly. In this environment, attention and capital tend to move fast. New projects appear regularly, and user preferences change with them. While this creates more options, it also highlights the need for careful evaluation of new platforms and tokens Key Takeaways: Pump.Fun briefly lost momentum in July as LetsBonk.Fun gained traction, peaking at over $197 million in daily volume — nearly 4x higher than Pump.Fun at the time. By August, Pump.Fun reclaimed dominance, with volume surging to $191 million compared to $6 million on LetsBonk.Fun. Platform changes such as paybacks and dynamic fees helped attract new meme coin creators back to Pump.Fun. The native PUMP token rose nearly 80% over two weeks, though it still trades about 15% below its all-time high. New contenders like Believe.me, Heaven, and Sugar.me briefly challenged Pump.Fun, but most failed to maintain long-term momentum. In July, rumors started swirling across the crypto community that Pump.Fun was “over” and a new king had emerged: LetsBonk.Fun. The narrative wasn’t entirely baseless. If you looked at trading volumes on meme coin launchpads, LetsBonk clearly started gaining ground throughout the month. At its peak on July 21, LetsBonk.Fun recorded just over $197 million in trading volume, while Pump.Fun sat at around $50 million — a nearly 75% drop by comparison.Source: Dune Doubts about Pump.Fun were amplified by the silence of its official X account and co-founder Alon, especially in the wake of the PUMP token launch. With no major updates or news about the promised airdrop, many in the community began to assume the worst. But the sentiment shift didn’t last long. However, LetsBonk.Fun’s popularity was short-lived. In August, Pump.Fun reclaimed its position as the “king of meme coins.” For comparison, as of Sep. 10, the platform recorded a trading volume of $191 million, while its competitor managed only around $6 million. Did Paybacks Make the Difference? There could be several reasons behind the drop in interest toward LetsBonk.Fun. First, the hype around the platform may have simply faded, which is common in crypto markets. But more importantly, Pump.Fun adjusted its strategy and started offering better incentives to both traders and meme coin creators. One major update was the introduction of payback mechanics. Additionally, the platform added dynamic fees that reward meme coin creators directly. This change made Pump.Fun more appealing for new projects looking to launch their tokens, as creators now have the chance to earn a share of the launch fees. In other words, the platform started sharing its revenue with the community.Source: Pump.Fun’s X account Another important factor is the weekly paybacks in PUMP tokens. These distributions reward token holders regularly, helping boost demand for PUMP and increasing user engagement across the ecosystem. The impact is already visible in the token’s price. According to CoinGecko, PUMP has gained nearly 80% over the past two weeks. At the time of writing, it is just about 15% away from its all-time high (ATH). While many in the community still criticize the token after its initial crash, the recent recovery suggests growing confidence in the project.Source: CoinGecko More Meme Coins and Launchpads Enter the Scene LetsBonk.Fun wasn’t the only one trying to knock Pump.Fun off the throne. Earlier in the summer, there was a wave of hype around Believe.me, a platform built on the concept of Internet Capital Markets (ICM). In simple terms, users can launch meme coins based on an idea or narrative. Some startups joined the platform, including Fitcoin (FITCOIN) — an app focused on wardrobe and outfit suggestions. At the height of its popularity, Believe.me nearly matched Pump.Fun in terms of token launch trading volume.Source: Blackwork Research Despite the short-term success of these challengers, new platforms continue to emerge. In August, a new launchpad called Heaven went live. Learning from previous platforms, it immediately introduced a full 100% payback model. Shortly after launch, Heaven became the second-largest token launchpad after Pump.Fun. On Aug. 9, it accounted for nearly 28% of all new meme coin launches, while Pump.Fun held 63%. LetsBonk.Fun and Believe.me faded into the background with only 1.7% and 0.4%, respectively.Source: Dune Competition That Shapes the Meme Coin Space The growing competition between meme coins is leading to a more dynamic and responsive environment for both creators and traders. As platforms work to attract attention and liquidity, they are adjusting their models, offering new features, and becoming more creator-focused. Even Pump.Fun has made changes, such as introducing paybacks and flexible fee models, to stay ahead. At the same time, the fast pace of new token launches carries risk. Many meme coins are now created with the aim of becoming symbols of their respective platforms. One example is Useless Coin (USELESS) from LetsBonk, which gained rapid popularity earlier in the summer. Its market capitalization exceeded $400 million, with some calling it a possible successor to Fartcoin (FARTCOIN). Since July, USELESS has entered a correction and has not yet returned to its previous highs. A new launchpad, Sugar.me, has also emerged, currently ranking third in terms of launched tokens after Pump.Fun and LetsBonk. LetsBonk, in turn, has managed to reclaim second place, showing that market share in this space can shift quickly. In this environment, attention and capital tend to move fast. New projects appear regularly, and user preferences change with them. While this creates more options, it also highlights the need for careful evaluation of new platforms and tokens

Meme Coin Wars: Can Pump.Fun Hold On?

2025/09/11 22:45
5 min read

Key Takeaways:

  • Pump.Fun briefly lost momentum in July as LetsBonk.Fun gained traction, peaking at over $197 million in daily volume — nearly 4x higher than Pump.Fun at the time.
  • By August, Pump.Fun reclaimed dominance, with volume surging to $191 million compared to $6 million on LetsBonk.Fun.
  • Platform changes such as paybacks and dynamic fees helped attract new meme coin creators back to Pump.Fun.
  • The native PUMP token rose nearly 80% over two weeks, though it still trades about 15% below its all-time high.
  • New contenders like Believe.me, Heaven, and Sugar.me briefly challenged Pump.Fun, but most failed to maintain long-term momentum.

In July, rumors started swirling across the crypto community that Pump.Fun was “over” and a new king had emerged: LetsBonk.Fun. The narrative wasn’t entirely baseless.

If you looked at trading volumes on meme coin launchpads, LetsBonk clearly started gaining ground throughout the month. At its peak on July 21, LetsBonk.Fun recorded just over $197 million in trading volume, while Pump.Fun sat at around $50 million — a nearly 75% drop by comparison.

Source: Dune

Doubts about Pump.Fun were amplified by the silence of its official X account and co-founder Alon, especially in the wake of the PUMP token launch. With no major updates or news about the promised airdrop, many in the community began to assume the worst. But the sentiment shift didn’t last long.

However, LetsBonk.Fun’s popularity was short-lived. In August, Pump.Fun reclaimed its position as the “king of meme coins.” For comparison, as of Sep. 10, the platform recorded a trading volume of $191 million, while its competitor managed only around $6 million.

Did Paybacks Make the Difference?

There could be several reasons behind the drop in interest toward LetsBonk.Fun. First, the hype around the platform may have simply faded, which is common in crypto markets. But more importantly, Pump.Fun adjusted its strategy and started offering better incentives to both traders and meme coin creators.

One major update was the introduction of payback mechanics. Additionally, the platform added dynamic fees that reward meme coin creators directly. This change made Pump.Fun more appealing for new projects looking to launch their tokens, as creators now have the chance to earn a share of the launch fees. In other words, the platform started sharing its revenue with the community.

Source: Pump.Fun’s X account

Another important factor is the weekly paybacks in PUMP tokens. These distributions reward token holders regularly, helping boost demand for PUMP and increasing user engagement across the ecosystem.

The impact is already visible in the token’s price. According to CoinGecko, PUMP has gained nearly 80% over the past two weeks. At the time of writing, it is just about 15% away from its all-time high (ATH). While many in the community still criticize the token after its initial crash, the recent recovery suggests growing confidence in the project.

Source: CoinGecko

More Meme Coins and Launchpads Enter the Scene

LetsBonk.Fun wasn’t the only one trying to knock Pump.Fun off the throne. Earlier in the summer, there was a wave of hype around Believe.me, a platform built on the concept of Internet Capital Markets (ICM). In simple terms, users can launch meme coins based on an idea or narrative. Some startups joined the platform, including Fitcoin (FITCOIN) — an app focused on wardrobe and outfit suggestions.

At the height of its popularity, Believe.me nearly matched Pump.Fun in terms of token launch trading volume.

Source: Blackwork Research

Despite the short-term success of these challengers, new platforms continue to emerge. In August, a new launchpad called Heaven went live. Learning from previous platforms, it immediately introduced a full 100% payback model.

Shortly after launch, Heaven became the second-largest token launchpad after Pump.Fun. On Aug. 9, it accounted for nearly 28% of all new meme coin launches, while Pump.Fun held 63%. LetsBonk.Fun and Believe.me faded into the background with only 1.7% and 0.4%, respectively.

Source: Dune

Competition That Shapes the Meme Coin Space

The growing competition between meme coins is leading to a more dynamic and responsive environment for both creators and traders. As platforms work to attract attention and liquidity, they are adjusting their models, offering new features, and becoming more creator-focused. Even Pump.Fun has made changes, such as introducing paybacks and flexible fee models, to stay ahead.

At the same time, the fast pace of new token launches carries risk. Many meme coins are now created with the aim of becoming symbols of their respective platforms. One example is Useless Coin (USELESS) from LetsBonk, which gained rapid popularity earlier in the summer. Its market capitalization exceeded $400 million, with some calling it a possible successor to Fartcoin (FARTCOIN).

Since July, USELESS has entered a correction and has not yet returned to its previous highs.

A new launchpad, Sugar.me, has also emerged, currently ranking third in terms of launched tokens after Pump.Fun and LetsBonk. LetsBonk, in turn, has managed to reclaim second place, showing that market share in this space can shift quickly.

In this environment, attention and capital tend to move fast. New projects appear regularly, and user preferences change with them. While this creates more options, it also highlights the need for careful evaluation of new platforms and tokens.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
Explosive 25% Penalty On Nations Trading With Tehran

Explosive 25% Penalty On Nations Trading With Tehran

The post Explosive 25% Penalty On Nations Trading With Tehran appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Trump Iran Tariffs: Explosive 25% Penalty On Nations Trading
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 08:10