Uniswap’s UNI is moving inside a tight ascending triangle between $3.80 and $4.10. A breakout or breakdown from here sets up a 30% move in either direction.Uniswap’s UNI is moving inside a tight ascending triangle between $3.80 and $4.10. A breakout or breakdown from here sets up a 30% move in either direction.

Uniswap’s UNI Is Consolidating Inside a $0.30 Range With a 30% Move Waiting on Either Side

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
uniswap

UNI is sitting at $3.94 and going nowhere fast. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, depending on which way it resolves. The four-hour chart shows an ascending triangle forming since mid-February, with price compressing between horizontal resistance at $4.10 and a rising support trendline currently sitting around $3.80. The range is tight. The setup is clean. And the next confirmed close outside that $0.30 band is going to define the next major leg.

What the UNI Chart Is Showing

The ascending triangle structure is visible on the four-hour timeframe. Price dropped sharply in mid-February, falling roughly 29% before finding a floor, then spent the following weeks grinding higher along a rising support line. Each successive low has come in higher than the last, which is the ascending part. The ceiling, however, has stayed flat around the $4.00 to $4.10 zone, which the chart shows as a clear horizontal resistance level. That’s the triangle.

The current price of $3.94 puts UNI right at the apex, pressed against resistance with the support trendline catching up from below. The squeeze is getting tighter, which typically precedes a directional move. The direction is the open question.

The Bullish Case: $5.00 to $5.30

A four-hour candle close above $4.10 would validate the breakout. That’s the level that has capped price repeatedly over the past several weeks, and a clean close above it shifts the technical picture from neutral to bullish. The measured move target on an ascending triangle of this size points toward the $5.00 to $5.30 range, a liquidity cluster that lines up with roughly 30% upside from current levels.

For that scenario to play out, buyers need to absorb whatever sell pressure has been defending the $4.10 level and push through it with enough conviction to hold on a retest. A wick above $4.10 that closes back inside the range doesn’t count. The close matters.

The Bearish Case: Back to $2.80

The other side of this setup is less comfortable to think about but equally valid. The $3.80 ascending support line is the floor that has held through the entire consolidation period. If that level fails on a four-hour close, the structure is invalidated. 

There is no ascending triangle anymore, just a failed pattern and a price in search of the next real support.

The February lows near $2.80 become the logical target in that scenario, which represents a roughly 29% drop from current levels. That lines up closely with the February selloff shown on the chart, where UNI shed 29.23% in a sharp move before the current recovery began. The downside scenario is essentially a retest of that same territory.

Potential UNI Trade?

The honest answer is not much, yet. The setup is described explicitly as a no-trade zone until price defines its direction. Both outcomes are technically equal at this point. Positioning ahead of the breakout means guessing, and the chart doesn’t give an edge in either direction until one side capitulates.

The trade, if there is one, comes after confirmation. A sustained close above $4.10 with follow-through gives the bullish setup. A break and close below $3.80 gives the bearish one. Either is actionable with a clear invalidation level. Neither is actionable right now without one.

UNI has rebuilt structure since the February lows in an orderly way. The ascending triangle is a constructive pattern. But patterns only pay out when they resolve, and this one hasn’t yet. Patience is the position until the Uniswap buyers shows their hand.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26