Illustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock, SEC.govIllustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock, SEC.gov

SEC promises crypto clarity, but will it last?

2026/03/21 01:16
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

A version of this article appeared in our The Roundup newsletter on March 20. Sign up here.

Hi. Eric here.

On Tuesday, Paul Atkins gave the crypto industry a late Christmas gift.

The Securities and Exchange Commission chair issued a landmark interpretation of federal securities laws, providing long-sought clarity on which blockchain-based assets count as securities and which ones don’t.

“The SEC’s persistent failure to provide clarity in this question is over,” Atkins, a longtime crypto supporter, said in a speech at the DC Blockchain Summit.

Vitally, the new taxonomy considers Bitcoin, Ether, Solana and XRP to be digital commodities and not securities.

It’s a huge win for the crypto lobby. For years, the industry has argued that cryptocurrencies aren’t securities, but novel instruments and thus shouldn’t be subjected to the agency’s arduous policing.

Former SEC Chair Gary Gensler spent the bulk of his tenure disagreeing with that notion. Yet, with him stepping down from the role before US President Donald Trump could keep his promise to defenestrate Gensler, the SEC was primed to see things the industry’s way.

Since taking office, Atkins has steered the agency away from the crypto crackdown creeds of the Gensler era.

On the face of it, the industry just got everything it wanted. However, the question is for how long it can keep it.

Just like Atkins has pushed the regulator away from Gensler’s hardline stance, a new SEC chair could overturn the new crypto taxonomy. Atkins’ term as SEC commissioner ends in 2031.

Atkins acknowledged that the only way to future-proof his taxonomy is to write it into law.

“Only Congress can ensure that regulation in this area is future-proofed through comprehensive market structure legislation,” Atkins said.

Here’s the rub — it is unclear whether lawmakers will be able to get law approved before the crucial midterm elections in November.

The Democrats, who are often seen as more crypto-sceptic than their Republican counterparts, are likely to retake Congress, according to most polls. If that happens, legislative work on Capitol Hill will grind to a halt.

That gridlock is unlikely to end before the 2028 presidential election. It’s uncertain that whoever replaces Trump will follow Atkins’ lead on crypto.

Polymarket punters only give the Clarity Act a 63% chance of being signed into law in 2026.

And if lawmakers manage to break their standstill over the Clarity Act, the landmark crypto bill that’s been locked in legislative limbo for months, there are no guarantees that their compromise will align with the new SEC guidelines.

Even so, crypto lobbyists told Aleks Gilbert this week that they aren’t worried. Cody Carbone, head of crypto advocacy group the Digital Chamber, said that the signals he’s been getting from congressional leaders are that they are very aligned with the SEC.

“I don’t see any opportunity for Democrats to say, ‘Oh, we didn’t agree with what the SEC did,” Carbone said.

And on Capitol Hill, senators are busy discussing how to get the Clarity Act over the finishing line.

“We’ve come too far to go back to regulatory uncertainty,” Cynthia Lummis, senator from Wyoming and crypto champion, said on Friday. “Digital assets are the future and it’s time America gives them the environment they need to thrive.”

Bungled $50m Aave trade highly unlikely to be money laundering, experts say

When a crypto trader accidentally swapped $50 million for $37,000 last week using a decentralised finance app, onlookers were flabbergasted by the mistake. Some worried it may’ve been a case of money laundering. But, as experts told Tim Craig, that’s not the case. Probably.

Thugs slashed crypto worker’s mother with box cutter, demanded $9m to stop

Police are coming down hard on a wave of violent attacks against crypto investors and their families, as Tim Alper reports.

Fed zaps Bitcoin investors’ risk appetite. Here’s what to expect next for the price

The Federal Reserve’s hawkish tone zapped investors’ appetite for risky assets like Bitcoin. Here’s what markets watchers expect will happen next. Check out Lance Datskoluo’s report.

Post of the Week

Polymarket announced the opening of a new bar. Crypto Twitter remained unimpressed.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

Shalom Baranes, a Libyan refugee and chief architect for President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, described the president’s immigration policies as
Share
Rawstory2026/03/22 00:47
Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Republican strategist Steve Schmidt says he’s been a Republican for nearly 30 years, long enough to see it’s sad “devolution” over the last few.“Yesterday, was
Share
Alternet2026/03/21 23:54