The post Sam Bankman Fried’s past political cash gives AI PAC fuel for going after NY state lawmaker Bores appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A political actionThe post Sam Bankman Fried’s past political cash gives AI PAC fuel for going after NY state lawmaker Bores appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A political action

Sam Bankman Fried’s past political cash gives AI PAC fuel for going after NY state lawmaker Bores

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

A political action committee with ties to major tech and crypto donors is raising the specter of disgraced ex-FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried to target New York congressional candidate Alex Bores as the state legislator faces a crowded Democratic field.

A sharply worded mailer distributed by Think Big PAC told voters that the Democratic primary candidate for New York’s 12th Congressional District once got more than $100,000 in support from the former head of the failed global exchange, and alleges that “Bankman-Fried’s buddies are bankrolling Bores for Congress.” It also criticizes Bores’ campaign financing and positions him as out of step with constituents, urging voters to “do better than Bores.”

The attack lands as Bores competes in a high-profile primary that has drawn several prominent Democratic contenders, including Jack Schlossberg — a member of the Kennedy family — and other well-connected figures such as George Conway. The race to succeed Rep. Jerry Nadler in the deep-blue Manhattan district is expected to be one of the most closely watched primaries in the 2026 cycle.

“For someone who’s railed against deep fake AI, candidate Bores doesn’t seem to have trouble creating his own reality. He raked in over $100,000 from Sam-Bankman Fried’s sordid political network but refuses to acknowledge the connection” a spokesperson for Think Big PAC told CoinDesk, which confirmed the amounts through state elections filings. “Bores is entitled to his own opinion but not his own set of facts on the role SBF has played in bankrolling his political career.”

Think Big PAC says it’s backing candidates aligned with pro-technology policies and opposing those seen as hostile to innovation of artificial intelligence. The group has previously deployed spending to influence Democratic primaries in Ohio.

Bores, a first-term assemblymember representing parts of Manhattan, has recently drawn attention for introducing legislation focused on artificial intelligence safety and accountability at the state level. The bill aims to impose guardrails on advanced AI systems, and that legislative push may have made him a target.

The mailer zeroes in on political spending tied to Bankman-Fried, who was convicted on fraud charges tied to the collapse of FTX. In the 2022 cycle, Bankman-Fried and other FTX executives were among the largest political donors in U.S. politics, supporting candidates across the political spectrum. A CoinDesk analysis found that 196 members of Congress — more than one-third — received campaign support from Bankman-Fried or affiliated executives during that period. But Bores was unusual as one of only two state-level candidates in New York to receive help from the SBF-affiliated PAC (the other being Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado).

The Think Big PAC has already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on ads targeting Bores, including earlier television and digital spots attacking his past work at Palantir. Bores’ campaign pushed back on those ads, sending a cease-and-desist letter accusing the PAC of making “false and defamatory statements” in its ads.

Bores’ campaign has not responded to CoinDesk’s request for comment.

Read more: Congress’ FTX Problem: 1 in 3 Members Got Cash From Crypto Exchange’s Bosses

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2026/03/20/sam-bankman-fried-s-past-political-cash-gives-ai-pac-fuel-for-bashing-ny-candidate-bores

Market Opportunity
Fuel Logo
Fuel Price(FUEL)
$0.00106
$0.00106$0.00106
-2.75%
USD
Fuel (FUEL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

White House ballroom architect speaks out against Trump immigration policies

Shalom Baranes, a Libyan refugee and chief architect for President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom project, described the president’s immigration policies as
Share
Rawstory2026/03/22 00:47
Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Longtime Republican laments the GOP collapse into the 'gutter'

Republican strategist Steve Schmidt says he’s been a Republican for nearly 30 years, long enough to see it’s sad “devolution” over the last few.“Yesterday, was
Share
Alternet2026/03/21 23:54