The post Crypto News Today: Melania Token Creators Sued in New York Over Alleged Pump-and-Dump appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Court filings in New York have accused the designers behind the U.S. first lady, Melania Trump’s crypto project, of orchestrating a fraudulent scheme tied to her digital token, $MELANIA. The token was launched on January 19, 2025, a day before President Donald Trump’s inauguration.  $MELANIA Designers’ Fraudulent Scheme  According to the case filing on Tuesday, …The post Crypto News Today: Melania Token Creators Sued in New York Over Alleged Pump-and-Dump appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Court filings in New York have accused the designers behind the U.S. first lady, Melania Trump’s crypto project, of orchestrating a fraudulent scheme tied to her digital token, $MELANIA. The token was launched on January 19, 2025, a day before President Donald Trump’s inauguration.  $MELANIA Designers’ Fraudulent Scheme  According to the case filing on Tuesday, …

Crypto News Today: Melania Token Creators Sued in New York Over Alleged Pump-and-Dump

2025/10/22 13:48
Everything You Need to Know About $MELANIA Memecoin

The post Crypto News Today: Melania Token Creators Sued in New York Over Alleged Pump-and-Dump appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Court filings in New York have accused the designers behind the U.S. first lady, Melania Trump’s crypto project, of orchestrating a fraudulent scheme tied to her digital token, $MELANIA. The token was launched on January 19, 2025, a day before President Donald Trump’s inauguration. 

$MELANIA Designers’ Fraudulent Scheme 

According to the case filing on Tuesday, in the Southern District of New York, investors allege that executives at Meteora crypto exchange, where $MELANIA tokens were first traded, defrauded them. They were accused of secretly buying large quantities of the coin before hyping it to boost its price. 

The company’s associates then allegedly sold off their holdings for large profits, causing the token’s value to crash. The plaintiffs claim that they were deceived by this “pump and dump” operation. 

Window Dressing Scheme 

Melania Trump herself is not considered culpable, according to court documents. Instead, investors argue that her name and image were used as “window dressing” to lend legitimacy to the scheme and attract buyers. 

The alleged $MELANIA tokens, with several other cryptocurrencies, have now been added to legal proceedings. The scheme allegedly caused millions of dollars in losses to investors. 

According to WIRED, Max Burwick, a senior managing partner at Burwick Law, the law firm representing the plaintiffs, explained that this case could provide clarity for token launches in the future. He said, “This case could clarify basic expectations for token launches and disclosures in the US. We understand many across the crypto industry and regulatory community are following closely.” 

Moreover, the second amendment alleges that the misuse of Melania Trump’s name has corrupted the public trust. 

Market Outlook of MELANIA

Driven by the initial hype, $MELANIA surged to $13.73 after its launch. But the price quickly plummeted and is now trading at $0.09652, around 99% lower than its peak. A few days ago, the token hit its all-time low at $0.07554 on October 11.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
2025/09/19 07:17
Share