The workflow of the E2E-DEcomp algorithm at inference is shown in Fig. 1, and the structure of E2EDEcomp algorithm for inference is reported in Table 1. In Fig. 2 it is shown the qualitative comparison on a test material image of the adipose tissue using filtered back projection (FBP) and E2 E-DE Comp. Infig. 3 is is reported the PSNR error for a set of 10 testing images for the 2 material decomposition.The workflow of the E2E-DEcomp algorithm at inference is shown in Fig. 1, and the structure of E2EDEcomp algorithm for inference is reported in Table 1. In Fig. 2 it is shown the qualitative comparison on a test material image of the adipose tissue using filtered back projection (FBP) and E2 E-DE Comp. Infig. 3 is is reported the PSNR error for a set of 10 testing images for the 2 material decomposition.

End-to-End Deep Learning Improves CT Material Decomposition

2025/10/01 20:00

Abstract and 1 Introduction

  1. Dual-Energy CT Forward Model
  2. [Model-based Optimization Problem]()
  3. End-to-End Model-based Deep Learning for Material Decomposition (E2E-Decomp)
  4. Numerical Results
  5. Conclusion
  6. Compliance with Ethical Standards and References

4 End-to-End Model-based Deep Learning for Material Decomposition (E2E-Decomp)

\

\

\

\ The workflow of the E2E-DEcomp algorithm at inference is shown in Fig. 1, and the structure of the E2EDEcomp algorithm for inference is reported in Table 1.

\

5 Numerical Results

\ In order to reduce the number of learnable parameters we utilise the same architecture for the denoising module D at each iteration k with shared parameters ρ. In Fig. 2 it is shown the qualitative comparison on a test material image of the adipose tissue using filtered back projection (FBP) and E2E-DEcomp while in Fig. 3 is is reported the PSNR error for a set of 10 testing images for the 2 material decomposition.

\ Figure 2: Qualitative comparison between the material decomposition for adipose using E2E-DEcomp and FBP using different number of angular projections.

\

\ It is worth noting that the improvement in the decomposition accuracy are consistent, around 5 dB, across different levels of dose, i.e. from sparse views to higher number of projections. We have also compared the E2E-DEcomp framework with the FBP ConvNet method Jin et al. [2017] and Fig. 4 shows how E2E-DEcomp can achieve a faster convergence in training using fewer epochs.

6 Conclusion

This work proposed a direct method for DECT material decomposition using a model-based optimization able to decouple the learning in the measurement and image domain. Numerical results show the effectiveness

\ Figure 4: Comparison of the PSNR training error between the FBP ConvNet and the E2E-DEcomp algorithms.

\ of the proposed E2E-DEcomp compared to other supervised approaches since it has fast convergence and excellent performance on low-dose DECT which can lead to further study with clinical dataset.

\

7 Compliance with Ethical Standards

This is a numerical simulation study for which no ethical approval was required.

References

Hemant K Aggarwal, Merry P Mani, and Mathews Jacob. Modl: Model-based deep learning architecture for inverse problems. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 38(2):394–405, 2018.

\ Robert E Alvarez and Albert Macovski. Energy-selective reconstructions in x-ray computerised tomography. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 21(5):733, 1976.

\ Caifang Cai, Thomas Rodet, Samuel Legoupil, and Ali Mohammad-Djafari. A full-spectral bayesian reconstruction approach based on the material decomposition model applied in dual-energy computed tomography. Medical physics, 40(11):111916, 2013.

\ A. Eguizabal, O. Öktem, and M. Persson. A deep learning one-step solution to material image reconstruction in photon counting spectral CT. In Wei Zhao and Lifeng Yu, editors, Medical Imaging 2022: Physics of Medical Imaging, volume 12031, page 120310Y. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2022. doi:10.1117/12.2612426.

\ W. Fang, D. Wu, K. Kim, M.K. Kalra, R. Singh, L. Li, and Q. Li. Iterative material decomposition for spectral CT using self-supervised Noise2Noise prior. Phys Med Biol, 66(15):155013, July 2021. doi:10.1088/1361- 6560/ac0afd.

\ Kyong Hwan Jin, Michael T McCann, Emmanuel Froustey, and Michael Unser. Deep convolutional neural network for inverse problems in imaging. IEEE transactions on image processing, 26(9):4509–4522, 2017.

\ Thorsten RC Johnson, Bernhard Krauss, Martin Sedlmair, Michael Grasruck, Herbert Bruder, Dominik Morhard, Christian Fink, Sabine Weckbach, Miriam Lenhard, Bernhard Schmidt, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy ct: initial experience. European radiology, 17:1510–1517, 2007.

\ Yong Long and Jeffrey A Fessler. Multi-material decomposition using statistical image reconstruction for spectral ct. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 33(8):1614–1626, 2014.

\ Clemens Maaß, Matthias Baer, and Marc Kachelrieß. Image-based dual energy ct using optimized precorrection functions: A practical new approach of material decomposition in image domain. Medical physics, 36(8): 3818–3829, 2009.

\ Korbinian Mechlem, Thorsten Sellerer, Sebastian Ehn, Daniela Münzel, Eva Braig, Julia Herzen, Peter B Noël, and Franz Pfeiffer. Spectral angiography material decomposition using an empirical forward model and a dictionary-based regularization. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 37(10):2298–2309, 2018.

\ Paulo RS Mendonça, Peter Lamb, and Dushyant V Sahani. A flexible method for multi-material decomposition of dual-energy ct images. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 33(1):99–116, 2013.

\ Rohan Nadkarni, Alex Allphin, Darin P Clark, and Cristian T Badea. Material decomposition from photoncounting ct using a convolutional neural network and energy-integrating ct training labels. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 67(15):155003, 2022.

\ John L Nazareth. Conjugate gradient method. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 1(3): 348–353, 2009.

\ A. Perelli and M.S. Andersen. Regularization by denoising sub-sampled newton method for spectral CT multi-material decomposition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 379(2200):20200191, 2021. doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0191.

\ Zaifeng Shi, Huilong Li, Qingjie Cao, Zhongqi Wang, and Ming Cheng. A material decomposition method for dual-energy ct via dual interactive wasserstein generative adversarial networks. Medical Physics, 48(6): 2891–2905, 2021.

\ Emil Y Sidky and Xiaochuan Pan. Report on the AAPM deep-learning spectral CT grand challenge. Medical Physics, 2023.

\ Wim Van Aarle, Willem Jan Palenstijn, Jeroen Cant, Eline Janssens, Folkert Bleichrodt, Andrei Dabravolski, Jan De Beenhouwer, K Joost Batenburg, and Jan Sijbers. Fast and flexible x-ray tomography using the astra toolbox. Optics express, 24(22):25129–25147, 2016.

\ Ruoqiao Zhang, Jean-Baptiste Thibault, Charles A Bouman, Ken D Sauer, and Jiang Hsieh. Model-based iterative reconstruction for dual-energy x-ray ct using a joint quadratic likelihood model. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 33(1):117–134, 2013.

\

:::info Authors:

(1) Jiandong Wang, Shenzhen Xilaiheng Medical Electronics, (HORRON), China and Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK ([email protected]);

(2) Alessandro Perelli, Centre for Medical Engineering and Technology, University of Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK ([email protected]).

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

332M accounts and $28B TVL,

332M accounts and $28B TVL,

The post 332M accounts and $28B TVL, appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PayPal USD debuts on TRON as a permissionless token PYUSD0, enabled by LayerZero’s OFT standard and the Stargate Hydra extension. The announcement on September 18, 2025 (Geneva) introduces native interoperability between chains and transfers without manual steps for users; the news echoes elements already communicated by PayPal at the launch of PYUSD PayPal Newsroom. The move concerns an ecosystem that includes 332 million accounts and over $28 billion in TVL. In this context, the fungibility of a stablecoin regulated across multiple networks and the use of TRON as a settlement layer for payments and remittances is at stake. According to the data collected by TRONSCAN updated as of September 18, 2025, the network metrics confirm the cited volumes and highlighted traffic patterns. Our editorial team has verified the transaction logs and monitored the public chain metrics to corroborate the reported figures; the observations on daily flows and TVL are consistent with the network dashboards. Industry analysts observe that the entry of a regulated issuer like PayPal tends to increase institutional interest, provided there is transparency on reserves and compliance checks. What is PYUSD0 on TRON and why is it relevant PYUSD0 is the representation of PayPal USD on TRON. It is pegged one-to-one to PYUSD through the OFT standard: the two tokens remain a single stablecoin, fungible and reconciled across chains. The integration is made possible by Stargate Hydra, now operational through LayerZero. According to the founder of TRON, Justin Sun, the extension on TRON expands access and trust for users and institutions. For Bryan Pellegrino (CEO of LayerZero Labs), stablecoins represent a pillar of global payments and remittances, as the native compatibility between chains enables their operational scalability. It must be said that the alignment between issuer, cross-chain infrastructure, and settlement network is a key element. Key Numbers: TRON…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 08:18
Share