BitcoinWorld Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill In a stunning political confrontation that could reshape America’s AI future, a super PAC backed by Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI leadership has declared war on New York Assembly member Alex Bores and his groundbreaking AI safety legislation. The battle lines are drawn between Silicon Valley’s ‘move fast and break things’ philosophy and lawmakers demanding basic AI regulation to protect public safety. Why a16z Super PAC is Targeting AI Regulation Critics The newly formed Leading the Future super PAC represents a $100 million war chest dedicated to defeating politicians who support AI regulation. Backed by tech titans including Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, and AI search engine Perplexity, the group has made Bores its first political target. This massive financial commitment signals Silicon Valley’s determination to prevent what they call ‘handcuffing’ American AI innovation. Alex Bores’ Bold Response to Silicon Valley Pressure Rather than retreating, Bores has embraced the confrontation. ‘I appreciate how straightforward they’re being about it,’ Bores told journalists at a Washington D.C. workshop. When the super PAC threatens to spend millions against him, he forwards their messages directly to constituents. The New York Assembly member, currently running for Congress, represents a district where AI anxieties are rapidly increasing among voters concerned about: Data centers driving up utility costs Environmental impacts worsening climate change Chatbots affecting children’s mental health Automation transforming job markets The RAISE Act: Comprehensive AI Safety Legislation At the heart of the conflict stands Bores’ bipartisan RAISE Act, currently awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature. This landmark AI regulation represents one of the most comprehensive state-level AI safety frameworks in the nation. The legislation establishes critical requirements for large AI labs: Requirement Description Penalty Safety Plans Mandatory safety protocols to prevent critical harms Up to $30 million Incident Disclosure Reporting of safety incidents like model theft Civil penalties Risk Prohibition Ban on releasing models with unreasonable risks Legal enforcement Silicon Valley’s Fierce Opposition to AI Safety Measures Leading the Future executives Zac Moffatt and Josh Vlasto have pledged a ‘multi-billion dollar effort’ to defeat Bores’ campaign. They argue the RAISE Act represents ‘ideological and politically motivated legislation’ that threatens American competitiveness and national security. Their core objections include: Creating a patchwork of state regulations Slowing American AI progress Potentially allowing China to lead global AI development Undermining economic growth and job creation The Federal vs State AI Regulation Battle Intensifies Bores defends state-level AI regulation as essential when federal action remains stagnant. ‘The question should be, has Congress solved the problem?’ Bores challenges. ‘If Congress solves the problem, then it can tell the states to get out of the way.’ He argues states function as policy laboratories, moving quickly to address emerging threats while Washington deliberates. Building Trust Through Responsible AI Regulation Contrary to industry claims that regulation stifles innovation, Bores positions the RAISE Act as fundamentally pro-innovation. ‘Having basic rules of the road is actually a very pro-innovation stance if done well,’ he asserts. ‘I fundamentally believe that the AI that wins is going to be the AI that is trustworthy.’ This perspective reflects growing public demand for AI systems that prioritize safety alongside capability. Frequently Asked Questions What companies are backing the super PAC targeting Alex Bores? The Leading the Future super PAC receives support from Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, 8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale, and Perplexity AI. What is the RAISE Act’s current status? The bipartisan RAISE Act has passed the New York legislature and awaits signature by Governor Kathy Hochul. If signed, it would establish comprehensive AI safety requirements for large AI laboratories operating in New York. How does Alex Bores respond to Silicon Valley opposition? Assembly member Alex Bores has embraced the confrontation, directly sharing super PAC threats with constituents and arguing that public trust requires reasonable AI safety regulations. This high-stakes confrontation between a16z’s super PAC and Alex Bores represents a critical moment for AI governance. As billions flow into political campaigns and state legislatures become battlegrounds for AI policy, the outcome will determine whether America prioritizes unchecked innovation or balanced AI regulation that protects public safety while fostering technological advancement. To learn more about the latest AI regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI policy and institutional adoption. This post Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.BitcoinWorld Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill In a stunning political confrontation that could reshape America’s AI future, a super PAC backed by Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI leadership has declared war on New York Assembly member Alex Bores and his groundbreaking AI safety legislation. The battle lines are drawn between Silicon Valley’s ‘move fast and break things’ philosophy and lawmakers demanding basic AI regulation to protect public safety. Why a16z Super PAC is Targeting AI Regulation Critics The newly formed Leading the Future super PAC represents a $100 million war chest dedicated to defeating politicians who support AI regulation. Backed by tech titans including Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, and AI search engine Perplexity, the group has made Bores its first political target. This massive financial commitment signals Silicon Valley’s determination to prevent what they call ‘handcuffing’ American AI innovation. Alex Bores’ Bold Response to Silicon Valley Pressure Rather than retreating, Bores has embraced the confrontation. ‘I appreciate how straightforward they’re being about it,’ Bores told journalists at a Washington D.C. workshop. When the super PAC threatens to spend millions against him, he forwards their messages directly to constituents. The New York Assembly member, currently running for Congress, represents a district where AI anxieties are rapidly increasing among voters concerned about: Data centers driving up utility costs Environmental impacts worsening climate change Chatbots affecting children’s mental health Automation transforming job markets The RAISE Act: Comprehensive AI Safety Legislation At the heart of the conflict stands Bores’ bipartisan RAISE Act, currently awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature. This landmark AI regulation represents one of the most comprehensive state-level AI safety frameworks in the nation. The legislation establishes critical requirements for large AI labs: Requirement Description Penalty Safety Plans Mandatory safety protocols to prevent critical harms Up to $30 million Incident Disclosure Reporting of safety incidents like model theft Civil penalties Risk Prohibition Ban on releasing models with unreasonable risks Legal enforcement Silicon Valley’s Fierce Opposition to AI Safety Measures Leading the Future executives Zac Moffatt and Josh Vlasto have pledged a ‘multi-billion dollar effort’ to defeat Bores’ campaign. They argue the RAISE Act represents ‘ideological and politically motivated legislation’ that threatens American competitiveness and national security. Their core objections include: Creating a patchwork of state regulations Slowing American AI progress Potentially allowing China to lead global AI development Undermining economic growth and job creation The Federal vs State AI Regulation Battle Intensifies Bores defends state-level AI regulation as essential when federal action remains stagnant. ‘The question should be, has Congress solved the problem?’ Bores challenges. ‘If Congress solves the problem, then it can tell the states to get out of the way.’ He argues states function as policy laboratories, moving quickly to address emerging threats while Washington deliberates. Building Trust Through Responsible AI Regulation Contrary to industry claims that regulation stifles innovation, Bores positions the RAISE Act as fundamentally pro-innovation. ‘Having basic rules of the road is actually a very pro-innovation stance if done well,’ he asserts. ‘I fundamentally believe that the AI that wins is going to be the AI that is trustworthy.’ This perspective reflects growing public demand for AI systems that prioritize safety alongside capability. Frequently Asked Questions What companies are backing the super PAC targeting Alex Bores? The Leading the Future super PAC receives support from Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, 8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale, and Perplexity AI. What is the RAISE Act’s current status? The bipartisan RAISE Act has passed the New York legislature and awaits signature by Governor Kathy Hochul. If signed, it would establish comprehensive AI safety requirements for large AI laboratories operating in New York. How does Alex Bores respond to Silicon Valley opposition? Assembly member Alex Bores has embraced the confrontation, directly sharing super PAC threats with constituents and arguing that public trust requires reasonable AI safety regulations. This high-stakes confrontation between a16z’s super PAC and Alex Bores represents a critical moment for AI governance. As billions flow into political campaigns and state legislatures become battlegrounds for AI policy, the outcome will determine whether America prioritizes unchecked innovation or balanced AI regulation that protects public safety while fostering technological advancement. To learn more about the latest AI regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI policy and institutional adoption. This post Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill

2025/11/18 09:00
Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores' Safety Bill

BitcoinWorld

Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill

In a stunning political confrontation that could reshape America’s AI future, a super PAC backed by Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI leadership has declared war on New York Assembly member Alex Bores and his groundbreaking AI safety legislation. The battle lines are drawn between Silicon Valley’s ‘move fast and break things’ philosophy and lawmakers demanding basic AI regulation to protect public safety.

Why a16z Super PAC is Targeting AI Regulation Critics

The newly formed Leading the Future super PAC represents a $100 million war chest dedicated to defeating politicians who support AI regulation. Backed by tech titans including Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, and AI search engine Perplexity, the group has made Bores its first political target. This massive financial commitment signals Silicon Valley’s determination to prevent what they call ‘handcuffing’ American AI innovation.

Alex Bores’ Bold Response to Silicon Valley Pressure

Rather than retreating, Bores has embraced the confrontation. ‘I appreciate how straightforward they’re being about it,’ Bores told journalists at a Washington D.C. workshop. When the super PAC threatens to spend millions against him, he forwards their messages directly to constituents. The New York Assembly member, currently running for Congress, represents a district where AI anxieties are rapidly increasing among voters concerned about:

  • Data centers driving up utility costs
  • Environmental impacts worsening climate change
  • Chatbots affecting children’s mental health
  • Automation transforming job markets

The RAISE Act: Comprehensive AI Safety Legislation

At the heart of the conflict stands Bores’ bipartisan RAISE Act, currently awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature. This landmark AI regulation represents one of the most comprehensive state-level AI safety frameworks in the nation. The legislation establishes critical requirements for large AI labs:

RequirementDescriptionPenalty
Safety PlansMandatory safety protocols to prevent critical harmsUp to $30 million
Incident DisclosureReporting of safety incidents like model theftCivil penalties
Risk ProhibitionBan on releasing models with unreasonable risksLegal enforcement

Silicon Valley’s Fierce Opposition to AI Safety Measures

Leading the Future executives Zac Moffatt and Josh Vlasto have pledged a ‘multi-billion dollar effort’ to defeat Bores’ campaign. They argue the RAISE Act represents ‘ideological and politically motivated legislation’ that threatens American competitiveness and national security. Their core objections include:

  • Creating a patchwork of state regulations
  • Slowing American AI progress
  • Potentially allowing China to lead global AI development
  • Undermining economic growth and job creation

The Federal vs State AI Regulation Battle Intensifies

Bores defends state-level AI regulation as essential when federal action remains stagnant. ‘The question should be, has Congress solved the problem?’ Bores challenges. ‘If Congress solves the problem, then it can tell the states to get out of the way.’ He argues states function as policy laboratories, moving quickly to address emerging threats while Washington deliberates.

Building Trust Through Responsible AI Regulation

Contrary to industry claims that regulation stifles innovation, Bores positions the RAISE Act as fundamentally pro-innovation. ‘Having basic rules of the road is actually a very pro-innovation stance if done well,’ he asserts. ‘I fundamentally believe that the AI that wins is going to be the AI that is trustworthy.’ This perspective reflects growing public demand for AI systems that prioritize safety alongside capability.

Frequently Asked Questions

What companies are backing the super PAC targeting Alex Bores?
The Leading the Future super PAC receives support from Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, 8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale, and Perplexity AI.

What is the RAISE Act’s current status?
The bipartisan RAISE Act has passed the New York legislature and awaits signature by Governor Kathy Hochul. If signed, it would establish comprehensive AI safety requirements for large AI laboratories operating in New York.

How does Alex Bores respond to Silicon Valley opposition?
Assembly member Alex Bores has embraced the confrontation, directly sharing super PAC threats with constituents and arguing that public trust requires reasonable AI safety regulations.

This high-stakes confrontation between a16z’s super PAC and Alex Bores represents a critical moment for AI governance. As billions flow into political campaigns and state legislatures become battlegrounds for AI policy, the outcome will determine whether America prioritizes unchecked innovation or balanced AI regulation that protects public safety while fostering technological advancement.

To learn more about the latest AI regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI policy and institutional adoption.

This post Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27