The Tenth Circuit ruled 2-1 against Custodia Bank, upholding the Federal Reserve's authority to deny master account applications from crypto-focused state-chartered banks. The post Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial appeared first on Coinspeaker.The Tenth Circuit ruled 2-1 against Custodia Bank, upholding the Federal Reserve's authority to deny master account applications from crypto-focused state-chartered banks. The post Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial

2025/11/01 03:32

The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled against Custodia Bank on Oct. 31, affirming the Federal Reserve’s authority to deny the crypto-focused bank’s application for a master account. The 2-1 decision upheld a lower court judgment in favor of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

The court held that Federal Reserve Banks have discretion to reject master account applications from statutorily eligible institutions. Judge Ebel’s majority opinion rejected Custodia’s argument that Section 248a(c)(2) of the Monetary Control Act, which states services “shall be available,” creates a mandatory duty to grant accounts, according to the court opinion. The majority found that Section 342 of the Federal Reserve Act, which states a Reserve Bank “may receive” deposits, grants discretionary authority.

Master accounts provide banks with direct access to the Federal Reserve’s payment systems and allow institutions to hold reserves at the Fed.

Custodia had argued the Monetary Control Act’s language requiring that Federal Reserve services “shall be available” created a non-discretionary obligation. The bank contended that as a Wyoming-chartered Special Purpose Depository Institution eligible under federal law, it was entitled to an account.

Court’s Reasoning and Dissent

The majority opinion stated that reading a major access mandate into the Monetary Control Act’s pricing principles would be “finding an elephant in a mousehole.” The court also cited the 2022 Toomey Amendment, which requires reporting on rejected applications from eligible entities, as evidence that Congress understood rejections could occur.

Judge Tymkovich wrote a dissent arguing the Monetary Control Act’s “shall be available” language is a clear command. The dissent raised concerns under the Appointments Clause, warning the majority’s ruling grants “significant yet unreviewable executive authority” to unappointed officials.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City denied Custodia’s application in January 2023, citing heightened risks from its “novel” and “crypto-asset focused” business model.

Custodia CEO Caitlin Long, a Wall Street veteran, founded the bank to serve digital asset companies using a Wyoming SPDI charter.

Unlike federally chartered banks, which automatically receive master accounts, state-chartered institutions like Custodia must apply separately for Fed access. The bank had applied for the account in October 2020 and initially sued the Fed in 2022 over alleged delays exceeding 19 months.

next

The post Fed Wins Legal Battle Over Custodia Bank Master Account Denial appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Polkadot Moves to Launch DOT-Backed pUSD Stablecoin

Polkadot Moves to Launch DOT-Backed pUSD Stablecoin

The post Polkadot Moves to Launch DOT-Backed pUSD Stablecoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Polkadot community is moving toward launching a native stablecoin, pUSD, backed entirely by its DOT token. The proposal calls for deploying the DOT-collateralized stablecoin on the Polkadot Asset Hub using the Honzon protocol stack. This is the same framework that previously powered Acala’s failed aUSD stablecoin. Sponsored Sponsored Polkadot Community Backs pUSD to Reduce Reliance on USDT and USDC According to the proposal, pUSD is structured as an over-collateralized debt token, allowing users to borrow against their DOT holdings without liquidating them. PUSD aims to address past shortcomings and provide the network with a fully collateralized, decentralized stablecoin by focusing solely on DOT as collateral. If approved, it could reduce reliance on external stablecoins like USDT and USDC, while streamlining the OpenGov DOT-USDC/USDT conversion mechanism. “This would be expected to be the NATIVE stablecoin for Polkadot Asset Hub, reduce/replace dependence on USDT/USDC including OpenGov DOT-USDC/USDT stablecoin conversion process,” the proposal stated. Polkadot Treasury could also integrate the stablecoin, enabling users to make payments in pUSD instead of DOT. This would eliminate the need for the Treasury to manage separate stablecoin reserves. Additionally, it could also pave the way for using pUSD for staking rewards, gradually replacing DOT inflation over time. Meanwhile, Polkadot’s push for a native stablecoin comes at a critical juncture in the development of the blockchain network. Sponsored Sponsored According to DeFi Llama data, the network hosts less than $100 million in stablecoin assets, a fraction of the liquidity available on Ethereum and Solana. Polkadot Stablecoin Market Cap. Source: DeFiLlama This shortage has constrained decentralized finance activity and limited developer experimentation on Polkadot. Considering this, Gavin Wood, Polkadot’s co-founder, stressed that a fully collateralized decentralized stablecoin is “strategically essential.” He added that it needs to be deployed as soon as possible to unlock the network’s financial potential.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/28 18:27
Brazil’s OranjeBTC Joins Wave of Struggling Crypto Treasury Firms Turning to Buybacks

Brazil’s OranjeBTC Joins Wave of Struggling Crypto Treasury Firms Turning to Buybacks

The post Brazil’s OranjeBTC Joins Wave of Struggling Crypto Treasury Firms Turning to Buybacks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Brazil’s largest bitcoin treasury firm OranjeBTC has repurchased 99,600 of its own shares and announced it will delay additional BTC purchases. The move comes as it moves to bridge the gap between its market price and the net asset value (NAV) of its bitcoin holdings. The company spent 1.12 million reals (about $220,000) in the buyback operation. OranjeBTC, which recently listed on Brazil’s B3 exchange through a reverse merger with Intergraus, holds 3,708 bitcoin, worth roughly $409 million at current prices. It joins a growing number of digital asset treasury (DAT) companies with large cryptocurrency holdings leaning on buybacks while their prices sit in discounted territory. ETHZilla (ETHZ), for instance, recently sold $40 million in ETH to repurchase 600,000 shares under a $250 million buyback plan, after its market-to-NAV ratio (mNAV) dropped to 0.62. Similarly, Tokyo-listed Metaplanet (3350) committed 75 billion yen (around $500 million) toward buybacks funded by a bitcoin-backed credit line after its mNAV fell to 0.88. Sequans and Empery Digital have taken similar steps, moving BTC or expanding debt facilities to execute repurchases. Metaplanet’s shares are down some 6% since the buyback was announced, while ETHZilla’s shares are down more than 4%. Similarly, Sequans’ shares dropped more than 20% since the buyback announcement, while Empery Digital saw an 8% decline. OranjeBTC’s shares on Brazil’s B3 exchange closed up 0.3% in yesterday’s trading session. Source: https://www.coindesk.com/business/2025/10/31/brazil-s-oranjebtc-joins-wave-of-struggling-crypto-treasury-firms-turning-to-buybacks
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/01 10:30
Four-Year Cycle Conclusion: Five Disruptive Trends in Cryptocurrency by 2026

Four-Year Cycle Conclusion: Five Disruptive Trends in Cryptocurrency by 2026

Author: Alexander S. Blume Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News Late last year, I predicted that 2025 would be a "transformative year for digital assets," given the significant progress made in mainstream adoption across both retail and institutional markets. This prediction has been validated in several ways: increased institutional allocation, the tokenization of more real-world assets, and the ongoing development of crypto-friendly regulatory and market infrastructure. We have also witnessed the rapid rise of digital asset treasury companies, but their path has not been smooth. Since then, as Bitcoin and Ethereum have become more deeply integrated into the traditional financial system and gained wider adoption, their prices have risen by approximately 15%. Digital assets have undeniably entered the mainstream. Looking ahead to 2026, we will see the market continue to mature and evolve, with exploratory attempts giving way to more sustainable growth. Based on recent data and emerging trends, here are my five predictions for the cryptocurrency space in the coming year. 1. DATs 2.0: Bitcoin financial services will gain legitimacy. Digital asset treasury companies have experienced rapid expansion this year, but this has also been accompanied by growing pains. From flavored beverages to sunscreen brands, various companies are repackaging themselves as buyers and holders of cryptocurrencies, which has brought problems to this model, including investor skepticism, regulatory resistance, mismanagement, and low valuations. Amidst the surge of numerous companies, some DATs have also begun holding assets we might call "altcoins," but in reality, most of these projects lack historical performance or investment value and are merely speculative tools. However, in the coming year, many problems in the DAT market and its operational strategies will be resolved, and those genuine entities operating based on Bitcoin standards will find their place in the open market. Many DATs, even the largest ones, will see their share prices begin to converge more closely with the value of their underlying assets. Management will face pressure to create value for shareholders more effectively. It's well known that a company that simply holds large amounts of Bitcoin without doing anything (while maintaining large expenses such as private jets and high management fees) is not good for shareholders. 2. Stablecoins will be ubiquitous. 2026 will be the year of widespread adoption of stablecoins. USDC and USDT are expected to go beyond trading and settlement, penetrating more deeply into traditional financial transactions and products. Stablecoins may appear not only on cryptocurrency exchanges but also in payment processors, corporate treasury management systems, and even cross-border settlement systems. For businesses, the appeal lies in their ability to achieve instant settlements without relying on slow or costly traditional banking channels. However, similar to the DATs sector, the stablecoin market may also experience oversaturation: too many speculative stablecoin projects are launching, too many consumer-facing payment platforms and wallets are emerging, and too many blockchains are claiming to "support" stablecoins. By the end of this year, we expect many highly speculative projects to be eliminated or acquired by the market, and the market will consolidate under the more well-known stablecoin issuers, retailers, payment channels, and exchanges/wallets. 3. We will bid farewell to the "four-year cycle" theory. I now formally predict that the "four-year cycle" theory of Bitcoin will officially end in 2026. The market is now broader and more institutionally involved, no longer operating in a vacuum. Instead, a new market structure and sustained buying power will drive Bitcoin towards a sustained, gradual growth trajectory. This means that overall volatility will decrease, and its function as a store of value will become more stable, which should attract more traditional investors and market participants worldwide. Bitcoin will evolve from a trading instrument into a new asset class, accompanied by more stable cash flows, longer holding periods, and fewer so-called "cycles" overall. 4. US investors will be granted access to offshore liquidity markets. As digital assets become more mainstream, coupled with favorable government policies, changes in regulations and market structures will allow US investors to access overseas cryptocurrency liquidity. This may not be a sudden shift, but over time we will see more approved affiliates, more sophisticated custody solutions, and offshore platforms that can comply with US standards. Certain stablecoin projects may also accelerate this trend. Dollar-backed stablecoins have already been able to flow across borders in ways that are impossible through traditional banking channels. As major issuers move into regulated offshore markets, they are poised to become bridges connecting US capital with global liquidity pools. In short, stablecoins may ultimately be precisely what regulators have been struggling to address: connecting US investors with international digital asset markets in a clear and traceable manner. This is crucial because offshore liquidity plays a key role in price discovery in the digital asset market. The next stage of market maturity will be the standardization of cross-border market operations. 5. Products will tend to become more complex and sophisticated. In the new year, the complexity of Bitcoin-related debt and equity products, as well as trading products focused on Bitcoin-denominated returns, will reach new heights. Investors, including those who previously shunned digital assets, will embrace this newer and more sophisticated portfolio. We are likely to see structured products using Bitcoin as collateral, as well as investment strategies designed to generate real returns from Bitcoin exposure (rather than simply betting on price movements). ETFs are also beginning to move beyond simple price tracking, offering sources of return through staking or options strategies, although fully diversified total return products remain limited. Derivatives will become more complex and better integrated with standard risk frameworks. By 2026, Bitcoin's function will likely shift from being primarily a speculative tool to becoming a core component of financial infrastructure.
Share
PANews2025/11/01 10:29