LunarCrush discloses top AI crypto projects by social activity, with Bittensor ($TAO) leading, followed by $FET, $RENDER, $HOLO, and a few others.LunarCrush discloses top AI crypto projects by social activity, with Bittensor ($TAO) leading, followed by $FET, $RENDER, $HOLO, and a few others.

LunarCrush Reveals the List Top AI Projects by Social Activity

2025/09/24 02:15
aii55

LunarCrush, a platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze digital assets like cryptocurrencies, has revealed the list of Top 10 AI Projects by social activity. Social Activity consists of Posts, Interactions, and Social Dominance. These three measures are used to check the Social activity of cryptocurrencies. Bittersor ($TAO) leads the Tops 10 AI Projects by social activity.

CryptoDep has released this news through its official X account. In this ranking list, Bittensor ($TAO) dominates the market with 10.9K posts, 923K Interactions, and stands with 0.80% Social Dominance.

Simultaneously, Fetch ($FET) is runner-up in this race with 2.67K Posts and 151K Interactions, and got 0.25% Social Dominance. The huge difference between these AI Projects shows that the demand for ($TAO) is much more than ($FET) in the crypto market.

$RENDER and $HOLO show Small Posts Gap with Huge Interactions Difference

RENDER ($RENDER) and Holoworld AI ($HOLO) got third and fourth position with 2.35K and 1.85K Posts, respectively. These AI Projects show negligible difference in term of Posts about 0.5K. While moving to Interactions in which there difference got hype to 171K. So, ($RENDER) stands with 138K, and ($HOLO) at 309K in Interactions and have Social Dominance of 0.25% and 0.20% respectively.

Moreover, there two more AI projects which got Posts in ‘thousands’ by social activity. In this the first one is PAAL AI ($PAAL) gained 1.57K posts and 123K Interactions with Social Dominance of 0.20%. Further, the next one is ChainGPT ($CGPT) positioned its-self with 1.14K Posts and 100K Interactions with the 0.15% Social Dominance in the market.

$LimeWire and $QUBIC Show Diverging Momentum

LimeWire ($LMWR) and QUBIC ($QUBIC) observed very close to each other in terms of Posts with 845 and 802 respectively. But, they show huge difference in terms of Interactions which is about 89K, and in this way ($LMWR) placed with 197K and ($QUBIC) with 108K in Interactions. Both AI Projects have same 0.10% Social Dominance.

In addition, Virtuals ($VIRTUAL) and AITECH ($AITECH) got second last and last position, respectively. In this race both AI Projects got 723 and 675 Posts, 82.7K and 197K Interactions, and 0.10% and 0.05% Social Dominance respectively.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28