The post Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13. Getty Images As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024. Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer. Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game. But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out. Inter Miami’s 2024 record … When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far … When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are. Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated. What Exactly Changed? The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching. Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable.… The post Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13. Getty Images As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024. Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer. Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game. But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out. Inter Miami’s 2024 record … When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far … When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are. Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated. What Exactly Changed? The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching. Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable.…

Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse

2025/09/30 08:56

Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13.

Getty Images

As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024.

Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer.

Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game.

But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out.


Inter Miami’s 2024 record …

  • When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L
  • When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L
  • When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L

Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far …

  • When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L
  • When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L
  • When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L

Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are.

Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated.

What Exactly Changed?

The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching.

Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable. And maybe that’s even true.

But there’s also more subtle factors that are as likely to be influential.

There’s the passage of time and the aging of Miami’s veteran core. While Messi hasn’t showed much sign of precipitous decline after turning 38 – and has also been healthier over the season so far than in 2024 – both Luis Suarez and Sergio Busquets have seemed to slide considerably from their 2024 levels. Busquets has already announced he’s retiring at the season’s end, and the 38-year-old Suarez’s future remains uncertain.

There’s also the turnover of Miami’s supplemental pieces, in general skewing away from those with MLS experience. Kamal Miller, Julian Gressel and Leonardo Campana are among those who were contributors to Miami during the 2024 season who were jettisoned since.

That could also trace back to the theory of the team being shaped more to Messi’s liking, with a plurality of the roster now having South American connections. But it’s also normal for an incoming manager and sporting director to have different ideas about personnel regardless of who the team’s star player is.

Pros And Cons

The drawbacks of having a team more reliant on a single 38-year-old are fairly obvious.

It makes earning consistent results over a long period more challenging, even when Messi is healthy. As prolific as he has been in 2025 – scoring an MLS-leading 24 goals and adding 14 assists in his 24 league appearances, even he can’t be expected to score in every match he plays. If Miami falls short of winning back-to-back Supporters’ Shield titles, that model of more reliance on Messi may be one reason to blame. And if he succumbs to any sort of injury for even a small portion of the playoffs, Miami’s postseason could be in real jeopardy.

But a game model that goes all in on your best player might actually be the better idea if your goal is to get hot at the right time. Knockout play is often more about determining who has the best positive momentum over a short period rather than who sustains excellence the longest.

The MLS Cup Playoff schedule also might bring less injury risk for Messi because the volume of matchesrelatively to time is less demanding. The championship-winning team could play as many as seven games total, but over a far more manageable stretch of roughly 40 days. Realisitically, Messi and Miami could win their first MLS Cup in only five matches between approximately Oct. 25 and the MLS Cup final on Dec. 6.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianquillen/2025/09/29/miami-depends-more-on-messi-under-mascherano-for-better-and-worse/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield

Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield

The post Botanix launches stBTC to deliver Bitcoin-native yield appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Botanix Labs has launched stBTC, a liquid staking token designed to turn Bitcoin into a yield-bearing asset by redistributing network gas fees directly to users. The protocol will begin yield accrual later this week, with its Genesis Vault scheduled to open on Sept. 25, capped at 50 BTC. The initiative marks one of the first attempts to generate Bitcoin-native yield without relying on inflationary token models or centralized custodians. stBTC works by allowing users to deposit Bitcoin into Botanix’s permissionless smart contract, receiving stBTC tokens that represent their share of the staking vault. As transactions occur, 50% of Botanix network gas fees, paid in BTC, flow back to stBTC holders. Over time, the value of stBTC increases relative to BTC, enabling users to redeem their original deposit plus yield. Botanix estimates early returns could reach 20–50% annually before stabilizing around 6–8%, a level similar to Ethereum staking but fully denominated in Bitcoin. Botanix says that security audits have been completed by Spearbit and Sigma Prime, and the protocol is built on the EIP-4626 vault standard, which also underpins Ethereum-based staking products. The company’s Spiderchain architecture, operated by 16 independent entities including Galaxy, Alchemy, and Fireblocks, secures the network. If adoption grows, Botanix argues the system could make Bitcoin a productive, composable asset for decentralized finance, while reinforcing network consensus. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/botanix-launches-stbtc
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:37
Share
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Share