The saga surrounding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin’s creator, resurfaced this week with a sharp response from Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz. Wright, the self-proclaimed creator, recently argued that civil courts cannot declare fraud, implying that past rulings against him were mere opinions, not legal conclusions.
This challenges the consistent legal rulings that have dismissed his claims of authorship of the Bitcoin white paper published in 2008. Schwartz quickly countered, pointing out that fraud is a well-defined legal concept, and Wright’s actions have consistently been deemed fraudulent in court.
Also Read: Cardano Founder Charles Hoskinson Urges Crypto Community to Unite for Massive Bullrun
Schwartz’s response focused on the legal definition of fraud, which involves misrepresentation and harm caused by false or reckless statements. Schwartz emphasized that Wright’s use of forged documents and inconsistent statements in court has led to multiple legal decisions rejecting his claims.
According to Schwartz, these decisions were not opinions, but formal legal rulings that conclusively found Wright’s arguments lacking in credibility. By referencing these legal findings, Schwartz reinforced the point that Wright’s claims to be Satoshi have not stood up to the scrutiny of the courts.
Schwartz’s rebuttal highlights the importance of legal rulings in clarifying the truth and preventing the narrative around Wright’s identity from being distorted. The Ripple CTO’s response served to remind the crypto community that the legal process has consistently dismantled Wright’s claims.
In a separate discussion, David Schwartz also addressed the growing role of Bitcoin in payments, particularly in light of Jack Dorsey’s announcement that Square had introduced Bitcoin payment services for four million U.S. merchants. The service, offering zero fees until 2027, has sparked debate over Bitcoin’s utility as a payment method given its rising price.
When asked who would pay in Bitcoin, Schwartz simply replied, “everyone,” explaining that people are willing to spend Bitcoin because it is valued by the recipient. His response underscores Bitcoin’s continued relevance as a payment method, despite its volatile price.
Wright’s identity debate continues to follow a repetitive pattern. His claims are consistently met with legal rulings that dismiss them, but he continues to reshape the narrative.
While the crypto community moves forward with new developments, Wright’s efforts to reignite the conversation only remind people of the long-standing legal conclusions that have already closed the case on his claims to be Satoshi.
Also Read: Scaramucci Family Invests Over $100 Million into American Bitcoin: Details
The post Ripple CTO Clashes with Craig Wright Over Bitcoin White Paper Identity Debate appeared first on 36Crypto.


