These 2 memecoins could produce massive gains in 2025

2025/08/15 02:01

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

As SHIB slows, investors eye two emerging memecoins with strong fundamentals, narratives, and upside potential.

Table of Contents

  • SHIB’s price struggles under the weight of expectations
  • Little Pepe: Momentum, scarcity, and a shot at a 100x move
  • SHIB vs LILPEPE: A matter of realistic potential
  • Floki Inu: Holding its own with real-world projects
  • Conclusion
Summary
  • SHIB stalls, while Little Pepe presale surges, offering 70–100x potential for early buyers.
  • Little Pepe’s Stage 10 presale shows strong momentum, low supply, and massive upside potential.
  • SHIB struggles as LILPEPE builds scarcity, utility, and presale gains ahead of exchange launch.

Not long ago, Shiba Inu was the darling of the memecoin world. However, as the months roll on, SHIB shows signs of fatigue. 

Price targets that once seemed inevitable now feel far-fetched. And as traders question whether the memecoin still has the energy to push toward $0.000025, attention is quietly shifting elsewhere. Two memecoins stand out now for their forward motion, fundamentals, and narratives.

SHIB’s price struggles under the weight of expectations

July offered a brief flicker of hope for Shiba Inu holders. The token climbed to $0.000017, sparking optimism that a proper recovery was underway. But that window has since closed. SHIB has now slipped back toward $0.000012, with bears controlling much of the action. Technical indicators aren’t helping the case. 

The MVRV ratio, used to identify overvalued or undervalued conditions, is now at -27.79%, suggesting holders are underwater. Meanwhile, whale wallets holding prominent positions are selling instead of accumulating, a concerning signal. Unless a significant technical reversal or a new utility narrative emerges, the likelihood of SHIB multiplying 10x from here is fading. 

Little Pepe: Momentum, scarcity, and a shot at a 100x move

While SHIB drifts sideways, Little Pepe is accelerating. Priced at just $0.0019, LILPEPE is deep into its presale, Stage 10, to be exact, with over $17.19 million already raised. 

Investors who joined early are already sitting on 70% gains, and even those buying today are getting in before the listing price of $0.003, which locks in a 76.5% upside at launch. Little Pepe is not just about building a community around a fun brand — it’s about giving that community tools: fast, low-cost transactions, staking rewards, and real-world utility baked into the chain’s design. And the tokenomics are setting the stage for a steep climb.

 With a capped total supply of 100 billion tokens and only 20 billion available at launch, LILPEPE has built-in scarcity. That kind of momentum and structure is hard to ignore. And as presale tokens continue to sell out fast, early adopters are positioning themselves for what could be a breakout moment when the token hits exchanges.

SHIB vs LILPEPE: A matter of realistic potential

Here’s the harsh truth: SHIB holders are beginning to face: getting SHIB to $0.000025 would require a market cap of nearly $6 trillion — more than all of crypto combined. Even a move to $0.00025 would require billions in inflows, which isn’t easy without a fresh wave of hype or a killer use case. LILPEPE, on the other hand, doesn’t need the impossible. 

With a 100 billion token cap and only 20 billion in circulation at launch, LILPEPE would hit $0.05 at just a $1 billion market cap. And if it mirrors the explosive growth of coins like PEPE or Floki at their peaks, a $5–10 billion market cap could send prices toward $0.25 to $0.50, putting 100x returns squarely on the table.

Floki Inu: Holding its own with real-world projects

Another name worth watching is Floki. The Viking-themed memecoin has spent the past year expanding into real utility. From its Valhalla metaverse to the FlokiFi suite of DeFi tools, it’s a coin that stays relevant even as other meme tokens fade. Additionally, Floki keeps putting money into visibility. 

Global advertising pushes, donations to on-the-ground causes, and regular dev updates all underline that this coin is about more than a quick pop. It’s a brand with sustained, forward-looking ambitions. While it may not offer the same explosive upside as LILPEPE, Floki stands out for its stability and follow-through — two rare things in the meme coin space.

Conclusion

Little Pepe offers a high-conviction entry point, driven by tight tokenomics, blockchain utility, and an explosive presale nearing its $0.003 launch price. With the chance to multiply by 50 to 100x, it’s drawing serious attention from anyone looking for big wins next year. At the same time, Floki is moving well beyond its meme origins, now powering into the metaverse and ramping up its brands worldwide. Put LILPEPE’s rising strength beside Floki’s enlarging landscape, and anyone still holding SHIB might start to question where their capital really earns its keep.

To learn more about Little Pepe, visit the website, Telegram, and X.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Stablecoin Speculation Triggers Swings, Hong Kong SFC and HKMA Caution Investors

Stablecoin Speculation Triggers Swings, Hong Kong SFC and HKMA Caution Investors

Key Takeaways: Global stablecoin policy approaches vary, creating potential competitive advantages for certain jurisdictions. Issuers may adjust their base of operations based on regulatory timelines and operational flexibility. Cross-border stablecoin adoption could be influenced by regional licensing requirements and compliance costs. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) have issued a joint statement cautioning investors about sharp market movements linked to stablecoin-related announcements . The statement , published on August 14, comes amid price swings triggered by corporate disclosures, media coverage, social media posts, and speculation over potential stablecoin licensing in the city. Strict Stablecoin Licensing Criteria in Hong Kong The regulators noted that some claims have referenced recent communications with financial authorities, but stressed that such interactions form only part of the licensing process. The HKMA said approval depends on meeting high thresholds set under its stablecoin issuer framework. “An indication of interest or application for a stablecoin licence, and the HKMA’s communication with the interested entities are just part of the licensing process ,” the HKMA said. “The granting of a licence will be determined by the fulfilment of the licensing criteria.” The SFC and HKMA warned that preliminary plans or licence applications often carry considerable uncertainty. 🚀 GF Securities has teamed up with @HashKeyGroup to roll out tokenized securities denominated in US dollars, Hong Kong dollars, and offshore yuan. #Hashkey #Tokenization https://t.co/6DuiJE1WXl — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) June 27, 2025 They said market volatility driven by speculation can prompt irrational investor decisions, leading to unnecessary financial risks. The agencies urged the public to conduct thorough research and avoid basing investment choices on price momentum or market hype. SFC Executive Warns of Volatility SFC Chief Executive Officer Julia Leung said investors should be wary of unsubstantiated claims, particularly on social media. “They should always be mindful of the misleading prospects of gains from short-term price volatility,” she said, adding that the SFC will continue monitoring market activity and take enforcement action against manipulative or deceptive conduct. HKMA Chief Executive Eddie Yue said only a small number of stablecoin licences will be granted initially. He confirmed that the authority has engaged with dozens of parties interested in licensing, but stressed that such contact does not indicate approval or endorsement of any applicant’s prospects. The regulators also reminded market participants to avoid public statements that could mislead investors or create unrealistic expectations, demonstrating that safeguarding market integrity remains a shared priority. With Hong Kong moving forward with its regime, market participants may increasingly compare approval timelines, compliance costs, and operational flexibility across regions—factors that could influence where major issuers choose to base their activities and how cross-border stablecoin use evolves. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) How do other major jurisdictions regulate stablecoin issuers? Approaches range from comprehensive licensing regimes in Singapore and the EU to more fragmented state-level oversight in the U.S. Could differing regulations lead to market fragmentation? Yes. Divergent rules may create regional ecosystems with limited interoperability, affecting liquidity and cross-border transaction efficiency. What factors influence where a stablecoin issuer chooses to operate? Issuers typically consider regulatory clarity, licensing speed, capital requirements, and the jurisdiction’s openness to digital asset innovation. How might cross-border adoption evolve? If multiple jurisdictions align on technical and compliance standards, stablecoins could see broader use in international trade and remittances. Do regulatory differences affect investor protection? Yes. Stronger oversight can improve disclosure and safeguard measures, but may also increase operational costs for issuers.
Share
CryptoNews2025/08/15 02:29