The post Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A sign is seen outside of the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre on Hollywood Boulevard, from where the show is broadcast in Hollywood, California on Sept. 18, 2025. Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images Disney’s decision this week to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its broadcast network ABC is shining a light on a part of the media business over which the federal government has control.  On Thursday, President Donald Trump suggested his administration should revoke the licenses of broadcast TV stations that he said are “against” him. Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has made similar threats, including during a CNBC interview, also on Thursday. It’s not the first time Trump or Carr has invoked the government’s power to pull a broadcast station license — putting an in-the-weeds part of the media business front and center for consumers, and flexing the government’s power over a major part of the industry.  What’s a broadcast license? Let’s start with the basics: Networks such as Disney’s ABC, Paramount Skydance’s CBS, Comcast Corp.’s NBC and Fox Corp.’s Fox are part of a system that requires them to obtain over-the-air spectrum licenses from the federal government in order to broadcast these household-name stations.  That means free, over-the-air service to anyone with an antenna on their TV.  Pay-TV networks such as CNN, MTV or FX, for example, are considered “over-the-top” and available for subscription fees. They’re often bundled together and distributed by companies such as Comcast, Charter Communications or DirecTV.  Broadcasters such as ABC are known for programming that includes local news, live sports, prime-time sitcoms and dramas, as well as late-night shows such as “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Although the way consumers watch these programs has significantly changed from the days of using an antenna for free viewership… The post Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A sign is seen outside of the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre on Hollywood Boulevard, from where the show is broadcast in Hollywood, California on Sept. 18, 2025. Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images Disney’s decision this week to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its broadcast network ABC is shining a light on a part of the media business over which the federal government has control.  On Thursday, President Donald Trump suggested his administration should revoke the licenses of broadcast TV stations that he said are “against” him. Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has made similar threats, including during a CNBC interview, also on Thursday. It’s not the first time Trump or Carr has invoked the government’s power to pull a broadcast station license — putting an in-the-weeds part of the media business front and center for consumers, and flexing the government’s power over a major part of the industry.  What’s a broadcast license? Let’s start with the basics: Networks such as Disney’s ABC, Paramount Skydance’s CBS, Comcast Corp.’s NBC and Fox Corp.’s Fox are part of a system that requires them to obtain over-the-air spectrum licenses from the federal government in order to broadcast these household-name stations.  That means free, over-the-air service to anyone with an antenna on their TV.  Pay-TV networks such as CNN, MTV or FX, for example, are considered “over-the-top” and available for subscription fees. They’re often bundled together and distributed by companies such as Comcast, Charter Communications or DirecTV.  Broadcasters such as ABC are known for programming that includes local news, live sports, prime-time sitcoms and dramas, as well as late-night shows such as “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Although the way consumers watch these programs has significantly changed from the days of using an antenna for free viewership…

Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained

2025/09/20 20:07

A sign is seen outside of the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre on Hollywood Boulevard, from where the show is broadcast in Hollywood, California on Sept. 18, 2025.

Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

Disney’s decision this week to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its broadcast network ABC is shining a light on a part of the media business over which the federal government has control. 

On Thursday, President Donald Trump suggested his administration should revoke the licenses of broadcast TV stations that he said are “against” him. Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has made similar threats, including during a CNBC interview, also on Thursday.

It’s not the first time Trump or Carr has invoked the government’s power to pull a broadcast station license — putting an in-the-weeds part of the media business front and center for consumers, and flexing the government’s power over a major part of the industry. 

What’s a broadcast license?

Let’s start with the basics: Networks such as Disney’s ABC, Paramount Skydance’s CBS, Comcast Corp.’s NBC and Fox Corp.’s Fox are part of a system that requires them to obtain over-the-air spectrum licenses from the federal government in order to broadcast these household-name stations. 

That means free, over-the-air service to anyone with an antenna on their TV. 

Pay-TV networks such as CNN, MTV or FX, for example, are considered “over-the-top” and available for subscription fees. They’re often bundled together and distributed by companies such as Comcast, Charter Communications or DirecTV. 

Broadcasters such as ABC are known for programming that includes local news, live sports, prime-time sitcoms and dramas, as well as late-night shows such as “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”

Although the way consumers watch these programs has significantly changed from the days of using an antenna for free viewership — now they’re often viewed via pay-TV bundles, plus the content is frequently found on streaming platforms — the model has remained largely the same. 

Companies that own local broadcast TV stations, such as Nexstar Media Group and Sinclair, license spectrum — or the public airwaves — from the government, with the FCC in control. 

Through this public spectrum for radio and TV stations, the federal agency has the right to regulate broadcasting and requires each network “by law to operate its station in the ‘public interest, convenience and necessity.’ Generally, this means it must air programming that is responsive to the needs and problems of its local community of license,” according to the FCC website.

Can Trump and the FCC revoke licenses?

That definition of serving the “public interest” is what the FCC’s Carr has zeroed in on with conversations around revoking licenses. 

On Thursday, Carr told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” that comments by Kimmel, linking the suspect in the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk to Trump’s MAGA movement, were “not a joke,” and instead, he said, were “appearing to directly mislead the American public about … probably one of the most significant political events we’ve had in a long time.” 

When Trump has noted the government’s right to take away licenses — both this week and in the past — he has pointed to what he said is bias against him as president. 

“I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative,” Trump said Thursday, referring to his 2024 election victory. 

“They give me only bad publicity, press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” Trump said. “I would think maybe their license should be taken away.” 

People protest at the El Capitan Entertainment Centre, where “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” was recorded for broadcast, following his suspension for remarks he made regarding Charlie Kirk’s assassination, on Hollywood Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, U.S. Sept. 18, 2025.

David Swanson | Reuters

In August, Trump accused networks ABC and NBC of being “two of the worst and most biased networks in history” and suggested revoking their broadcast licenses.

Carr earlier this year, freshly in his post as FCC chairman, reawakened complaints directed at ABC, NBC and CBS from the conservative organization the Center for American Rights. 

And in February, during a conversation at Semafor’s “Innovating to Restore Trust in News” summit in Washington, D.C., he suggested the agency would be looking closely at licenses. 

“If you’re going to have a license to be a broadcaster, it comes with something called ‘you have to serve the public interest.’ If you don’t want to do that, that’s OK,” Carr said during the summit. “I will give you the address of the FCC … you’re free to turn your license in and you can go podcast and you go over-the-top.” 

What happens if ABC or NBC loses its license? 

If the federal government deems a broadcast TV network isn’t acting in the public interest, it can revoke the license from the station’s owner, and the local station would effectively go dark in its market. 

The local networks can preempt the programming, meaning air something other than what the broader network is offering up. That would theoretically keep the stations in compliance if the FCC were to find the broadcast content unlawful. But it’s unclear where that line would fall. 

The process of revoking a license isn’t so simple, according to Roy Gutterman, a professor and expert on communications law and the First Amendment at Syracuse University’s Newhouse School.

“There’s a whole process before you can yank someone’s license,” Gutterman said, adding that the matter would be subject to an investigation and procedure — and would likely garner legal challenges. 

Typically, the discussion of whether a station violated the FCC’s guidelines centers around children’s programming, a cut to news content, or obscenity — such as Janet Jackson’s wardrobe malfunction during the Super Bowl in 2004.

Trump and his administration’s threats take a different tack.

“This is such an unprecedented issue,” Gutterman said. “Responsible use of the airwaves doesn’t mean having the political language [the government] doesn’t want on there … Responsible use isn’t a political issue.”

Pressure mounting

There’s another factor at play here: The government’s role in local TV consolidation.

On Wednesday, before ABC sidelined Kimmel, Nexstar announced its stations affiliated with ABC wouldn’t air the late night show and instead would preempt it “for the foreseeable future” due to the host’s statements. 

While Disney owns a portion of its ABC-affiliated networks, Nexstar, as well as Sinclair — which similarly said it would preempt the show — own the vast majority. Nexstar owns about 30 ABC-affiliated networks across the U.S., or 10% of the more than 200 stations Nexstar owns in total.

Nexstar is currently seeking government approval of a $6.2 billion deal to merge with fellow broadcast TV station owner Tegna, which would upend longstanding regulations for broadcast station owners. 

Sinclair has also said it’s looking to merge its broadcast TV station business with another competitor, although a deal has yet to be announced. 

While Nexstar and its peers have bulked up over the years through acquisitions, they’ve been subject to longstanding federal limits on the number of stations that these parent companies can own. 

On Tuesday, May 13, 2025 at North Javits in New York City, an incredible roster of all-star talent will tout their connections to storytelling, Disney, and each other while showcasing their latest projects for the upcoming year.

Michael Le Brecht | Disney General Entertainment Content | Getty Images

Following Trump’s election in November, leaders of the station owners — as well as other media businesses — saw an opening for further consolidation and deals. 

The FCC’s Carr has also publicly said in recent months that he would support getting rid of broadcast station ownership rules and caps, paving the way for such deals, which could help salvage a business model that’s being disrupted. 

With the rise of streaming, the pay-TV ecosystem has bled consumers, and broadcast TV networks and local affiliates have also felt the effects. 

While the stations are free to air, distributors such as Charter pay the broadcasters so-called retransmission fees, on a per-subscriber basis, for the right to carry the stations. These lucrative fees heavily buoy the profits of companies such as Nexstar, which means dwindling pay-TV customers cuts into broadcast profits. 

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC under a planned spinoff.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/19/trump-threatening-broadcast-station-licenses-explained.html

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Cathie Wood: Early Life and Net Worth – The Vision Behind ARK Invest and the Future of Innovation

Cathie Wood: Early Life and Net Worth – The Vision Behind ARK Invest and the Future of Innovation

Cathie Wood’s vision shapes the future of disruptive innovation investments. ARK Invest pioneers the future of technology through strategic investment leadership. Cathie Wood’s wealth reflects her bold bets on transformative technologies. Cathie Wood is revolutionizing the world of finance and investment with her bold approach to disruptive innovation. As the founder, CEO, and CIO of ARK Invest, Wood has become a prominent figure in the financial world, known for her unwavering belief in the transformative potential of groundbreaking technologies. Her work is reshaping how investors view sectors such as artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, electric vehicles, and genomics. Wood’s influence extends beyond managing one of the most influential investment firms in the world—she is helping to pioneer a new approach to investing, where innovation is at the core. Through ARK Invest, Wood is leading the way for investors to understand and capitalize on the opportunities presented by technological disruption. Also Read: Mike Novogratz: Early Life and Net Worth – The Vision Behind Galaxy Digital and the Future of Crypto Cathie Wood: Early Life and Career Cathie Wood was born in 1955 in Los Angeles, California. Growing up, she was always intellectually curious and driven. After earning a degree in economics from the University of Southern California, she began her career in the investment world. Early on, she joined Capital Group, where she honed her skills in asset management, before transitioning to other firms like Jennison Associates and AllianceBernstein, where she specialized in growth investing. Her time at these firms helped Wood develop her investment philosophy: a long-term, research-driven approach that focuses on identifying disruptive technologies that can change the world. By 2014, with years of experience under her belt, Wood decided to pursue her vision independently by founding ARK Invest. The Birth of ARK Invest: A New Era of Disruptive Innovation In 2014, Wood founded ARK Invest with the bold vision of building a firm that focused on investing in disruptive innovation. Unlike traditional investment firms, ARK Invest takes an active approach to identifying and investing in technologies that have the potential to change industries and societies. ARK’s unique approach involves significant research into emerging technologies and their long-term impact, enabling the firm to anticipate trends and build a diversified portfolio of future-focused assets. ARK Invest has become widely known for its ability to invest in and nurture companies that are leading the way in industries like electric vehicles, autonomous driving, gene editing, and artificial intelligence. Under Wood’s leadership, ARK Invest has made early investments in groundbreaking companies such as Tesla, Roku, Square, and CRISPR Therapeutics, becoming one of the most influential players in the world of technology investment. Wood’s belief in the power of innovation has been central to the firm’s success. She has made it her mission to uncover technological breakthroughs and support them by backing companies that are on the cutting edge of transformation. Through ARK Invest, Wood has helped investors realize the potential of disruptive technologies in shaping the future of industries. A Vision for the Future: Embracing Disruption Cathie Wood’s investment philosophy revolves around her belief that innovation is the key to unlocking the future. Her vision goes beyond short-term market trends and focuses on technologies that will shape the next generation of businesses and economies. According to Wood, the industries that seem the most unlikely today are often the ones with the most potential for disruptive change. Wood is a staunch advocate for investing in disruptive innovation across five key areas: artificial intelligence, energy storage, robotics, DNA sequencing, and blockchain technology. Her vision is rooted in the idea that these fields will redefine how we live, work, and interact with the world. Her firm’s strategies often involve taking concentrated positions in companies that are well-positioned to benefit from these trends. For Wood, investing in disruptive technologies isn’t just about profit—it’s about fostering positive societal change. She believes that advancements in AI and genomics, for instance, can unlock new opportunities for medical treatments, making healthcare more personalized and accessible to millions. Cathie Wood’s Net Worth: The Wealth Behind the Vision As of 2025, Cathie Wood’s estimated net worth is between $230 million and $250 million. This wealth comes primarily from her 50% ownership stake in ARK Invest and her personal investments in disruptive technologies, including a significant allocation to Bitcoin. These estimates reflect the volatility inherent in Wood’s investment strategy, which focuses on high-growth sectors like artificial intelligence, genomics, and blockchain. ARK Invest’s performance has experienced fluctuations, impacting her personal wealth accordingly. For example, Forbes reported a decline in her net worth to $140 million in 2022, down from $400 million in 2021, due to market downturns affecting ARK’s funds. It’s important to note that these figures are estimates, as Wood’s exact net worth is not publicly disclosed. However, her significant role in ARK Invest and her investments in emerging technologies position her as a prominent figure in the investment community. Legacy: A Pioneer of the Disruptive Innovation Movement Cathie Wood’s legacy will likely be defined by her pioneering approach to investment in disruptive innovation. She has positioned herself as a leader not just in the financial world, but also as a thought leader in technology and societal change. Wood has made a name for herself by identifying long-term trends that others overlook, embracing technologies that are still in their infancy and betting on their future potential. Through her leadership at ARK Invest, Wood has challenged traditional approaches to investing and has been a vocal advocate for long-term, forward-thinking strategies. Her firm’s focus on high-growth, high-risk companies has created a new blueprint for understanding innovation in the 21st century. She has inspired both individual and institutional investors to rethink how they approach risk and reward, encouraging them to look toward the future instead of focusing on the status quo. Wood’s commitment to supporting the growth of transformative companies has not only shaped the investment landscape but has also influenced how the world thinks about the future of technology and its societal implications. FAQs 1. Who is Cathie Wood? Cathie Wood is the founder, CEO, and CIO of ARK Invest, an investment management firm that focuses on disruptive innovation. She is known for her expertise in identifying emerging technologies and her bold investment strategies in industries like AI, robotics, and genomics. 2. What is ARK Invest? ARK Invest is a global investment firm founded by Cathie Wood in 2014. The firm focuses on disruptive innovation and invests in emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, and blockchain. ARK Invest is known for its actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that focus on high-growth sectors. 3. What is Cathie Wood’s net worth? As of 2025, Cathie Wood’s estimated net worth is $6.5 billion, primarily derived from her investments in disruptive technologies and her ownership stake in ARK Invest. 4. What is Cathie Wood’s investment philosophy? Cathie Wood’s investment philosophy centers on identifying and investing in disruptive technologies that have the potential to transform industries and societies. She focuses on five key areas: artificial intelligence, energy storage, robotics, DNA sequencing, and blockchain. 5. How has Cathie Wood influenced the investment world? Cathie Wood has redefined how investors approach disruptive technologies, advocating for a long-term investment strategy that embraces high-growth, transformative companies. Her leadership at ARK Invest has made her a key figure in shaping the future of technology and finance. Also Read: Joe Lubin: Early Life and Net Worth – The Vision Behind Consensys and Ethereum The post Cathie Wood: Early Life and Net Worth – The Vision Behind ARK Invest and the Future of Innovation appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/10/04 19:50
Share