Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently launched Kohaku, a privacy and compliance solution, which is quite interesting. The key difference is that it differs from previous solutions like Tornado and Railgun, employing ZooKeeper and elliptic curve cryptography generation techniques. In simple terms, in the past, when Alice initiated an on-chain transfer to Bob's public address, everyone could see that Bob received the money. Now, Bob will generate a "one-time temporary address" to receive funds. Bob can legally use this money, but no one will know that the money belongs to Bob. Previous privacy solutions, such as Tornado, Railgun, and Aztec, used coin mixing or ZK solutions, where all the money was routed into a black box. Because the box had a large transaction capacity, the actual transfer path of the money was no longer visible. Kohaku's privacy solution involves Bob generating a Stealth Meta-Address master key. When receiving payments, a temporary, one-time receiving address is randomly generated (based on elliptic curve cryptography). Everyone can see that money has been received at this temporary address, but the address is invalidated after it is used up. Bob, who actually owns the master key, can control the money and claim it at some point in the future. To put it in a more abstract technical way: Bob's wallet permanently stores a master stealth key pair (public key + private key). When Alice transfers money to Bob, Alice/Bob's wallet generates a one-time temporary private key. Using Bob's public key and this temporary private key, an elliptic curve algorithm is performed to calculate a shared secret. This secret is then used to derive a completely new and entirely random one-time address. When Alice transfers money to this address, no one on the blockchain can tell it's related to Bob, but Bob can easily control the money using his master key and private key. above. It seems that only elliptic curve cryptography is needed, and it has nothing to do with ZK. However, if you use Kohaku technology to transfer money to a compliant institution, you may be required to attach a ZK proof to prove the source and true identity of the money, but at the same time you don't want to expose your privacy. This is where lightweight ZK verification comes in handy. Therefore, the combination of elliptic curve cryptography and ZooKeeper (ZK) technology has upgraded anonymity solutions into compliant privacy protection solutions. Consider the past: why were coin mixing pool solutions blocked? Because absolute "anonymity" provided opportunities for money laundering and other malicious activities. The combination of privacy addresses and ZK technology is the optimal solution to meet regulatory trends. Believe in somETHing!Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently launched Kohaku, a privacy and compliance solution, which is quite interesting. The key difference is that it differs from previous solutions like Tornado and Railgun, employing ZooKeeper and elliptic curve cryptography generation techniques. In simple terms, in the past, when Alice initiated an on-chain transfer to Bob's public address, everyone could see that Bob received the money. Now, Bob will generate a "one-time temporary address" to receive funds. Bob can legally use this money, but no one will know that the money belongs to Bob. Previous privacy solutions, such as Tornado, Railgun, and Aztec, used coin mixing or ZK solutions, where all the money was routed into a black box. Because the box had a large transaction capacity, the actual transfer path of the money was no longer visible. Kohaku's privacy solution involves Bob generating a Stealth Meta-Address master key. When receiving payments, a temporary, one-time receiving address is randomly generated (based on elliptic curve cryptography). Everyone can see that money has been received at this temporary address, but the address is invalidated after it is used up. Bob, who actually owns the master key, can control the money and claim it at some point in the future. To put it in a more abstract technical way: Bob's wallet permanently stores a master stealth key pair (public key + private key). When Alice transfers money to Bob, Alice/Bob's wallet generates a one-time temporary private key. Using Bob's public key and this temporary private key, an elliptic curve algorithm is performed to calculate a shared secret. This secret is then used to derive a completely new and entirely random one-time address. When Alice transfers money to this address, no one on the blockchain can tell it's related to Bob, but Bob can easily control the money using his master key and private key. above. It seems that only elliptic curve cryptography is needed, and it has nothing to do with ZK. However, if you use Kohaku technology to transfer money to a compliant institution, you may be required to attach a ZK proof to prove the source and true identity of the money, but at the same time you don't want to expose your privacy. This is where lightweight ZK verification comes in handy. Therefore, the combination of elliptic curve cryptography and ZooKeeper (ZK) technology has upgraded anonymity solutions into compliant privacy protection solutions. Consider the past: why were coin mixing pool solutions blocked? Because absolute "anonymity" provided opportunities for money laundering and other malicious activities. The combination of privacy addresses and ZK technology is the optimal solution to meet regulatory trends. Believe in somETHing!

Analysis of Kohaku, the Regulatory-Friendly Privacy Solution Launched by Vitalik Buterin

2025/11/18 18:00

Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently launched Kohaku, a privacy and compliance solution, which is quite interesting. The key difference is that it differs from previous solutions like Tornado and Railgun, employing ZooKeeper and elliptic curve cryptography generation techniques.

In simple terms, in the past, when Alice initiated an on-chain transfer to Bob's public address, everyone could see that Bob received the money. Now, Bob will generate a "one-time temporary address" to receive funds. Bob can legally use this money, but no one will know that the money belongs to Bob.

Previous privacy solutions, such as Tornado, Railgun, and Aztec, used coin mixing or ZK solutions, where all the money was routed into a black box. Because the box had a large transaction capacity, the actual transfer path of the money was no longer visible.

Kohaku's privacy solution involves Bob generating a Stealth Meta-Address master key. When receiving payments, a temporary, one-time receiving address is randomly generated (based on elliptic curve cryptography). Everyone can see that money has been received at this temporary address, but the address is invalidated after it is used up. Bob, who actually owns the master key, can control the money and claim it at some point in the future.

To put it in a more abstract technical way: Bob's wallet permanently stores a master stealth key pair (public key + private key). When Alice transfers money to Bob, Alice/Bob's wallet generates a one-time temporary private key. Using Bob's public key and this temporary private key, an elliptic curve algorithm is performed to calculate a shared secret. This secret is then used to derive a completely new and entirely random one-time address. When Alice transfers money to this address, no one on the blockchain can tell it's related to Bob, but Bob can easily control the money using his master key and private key.

above.

It seems that only elliptic curve cryptography is needed, and it has nothing to do with ZK. However, if you use Kohaku technology to transfer money to a compliant institution, you may be required to attach a ZK proof to prove the source and true identity of the money, but at the same time you don't want to expose your privacy. This is where lightweight ZK verification comes in handy.

Therefore, the combination of elliptic curve cryptography and ZooKeeper (ZK) technology has upgraded anonymity solutions into compliant privacy protection solutions. Consider the past: why were coin mixing pool solutions blocked? Because absolute "anonymity" provided opportunities for money laundering and other malicious activities. The combination of privacy addresses and ZK technology is the optimal solution to meet regulatory trends.

Believe in somETHing!

Piyasa Fırsatı
Wink Logosu
Wink Fiyatı(LIKE)
$0.004186
$0.004186$0.004186
+6.35%
USD
Wink (LIKE) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen [email protected] ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto casino Luck.io is reportedly paying influencers six figures a month to promote its services, a June 18 X post from popular crypto trader Jordan Fish, aka Cobie, shows. Crypto Influencers Reportedly Earning Six Figures Monthly According to a screenshot of messages between Cobie and an unidentified source embedded in the Wednesday post, the anonymous messenger confirmed that the crypto company pays influencers “around” $500,000 per month to promote the casino. They’re paying extremely well (6 fig per month) pic.twitter.com/AKRVKU9vp4 — Cobie (@cobie) June 18, 2025 However, not everyone was as convinced of the number’s accuracy. “That’s only for Faze Banks probably,” one user replied. “Other influencers are getting $20-40k per month. So, same as other online crypto casinos.” Cobie pushed back on the user’s claims by identifying the messenger as “a crypto person,” going on to state that he knew of “4 other crypto people” earning “above 200k” from Luck.io. Drake’s Massive Stake.com Deal Cobie’s post comes amid growing speculation over celebrity and influencer collaborations with crypto casinos globally. Aubrey Graham, better known as Toronto-based rapper Drake, is reported to make nearly $100 million every year from his partnership with cryptocurrency casino Stake.com. As part of his deal with the Curaçao-based digital casino, the “Nokia” rapper occasionally hosts live-stream gambling sessions for his more than 140 million Instagram followers. Founded by entrepreneurs Ed Craven and Bijan Therani in 2017, the organization allegedly raked in $2.6 billion in 2022. Stake.com has even solidified key partnerships with Alfa Romeo’s F1 team and Liverpool-based Everton Football Club. However, concerns remain over crypto casinos’ legality as a whole , given their massive accessibility and reach online. Earlier this year, Stake was slapped with litigation out of Illinois for supposedly running an illegal online casino stateside while causing “severe harm to vulnerable populations.” “Stake floods social media platforms with slick ads, influencer videos, and flashy visuals, making its games seem safe, fun, and harmless,” the lawsuit claims. “By masking its real-money gambling platform as just another “social casino,” Stake creates exactly the kind of dangerous environment that Illinois gambling laws were designed to stop.”
Paylaş
CryptoNews2025/06/19 04:53
U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

The post U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. banks could soon begin applying to issue payment
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 02:55