Across the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum. Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another. These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion. The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags. If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago. Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this storyAcross the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum. Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another. These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion. The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags. If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago. Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story

Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem

2025/11/14 19:06

Across the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum.

Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another.

These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion.

The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags.

If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago.


Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37