The post Solana and Base Network Clash Over New Bridge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko struck at the core of Coinbase’s Base expansion strategy this weekend, dismissing the Ethereum layer-2 network’s new bridge as an “alignment bullshit.” In a sharp rebuke of Base lead Jesse Pollak, Yakovenko argued that cross-chain bridges are rarely neutral infrastructure. He said they act as vectors for value capture, deciding where fees settle and which ecosystem benefits. Sponsored Solana Rejects Base’s ‘Alignment’ Message Yakovenko contended that Base applications must migrate their computation to Solana so that transaction fees and economic activity accrue to Solana validators. “Migrate base apps to Solana so they execute on Solana, and the transactions are linearized by Solana staked block producers. That would be good for Solana developers. Otherwise, it’s alignment bullshit,” he said. The dispute ignited after Pollak announced the integration last week, framing it as a “bidirectional” tool to unlock shared liquidity. “We built this as a two-way bridge. The whole point is to unlock movement both ways because we are hearing from Solana teams that they want access to Base, and from Base teams that they want access to Solana. We want to make that possible,” Pollak stressed. However, Yakovenko rejected this premise, warning that “alignment” is a marketing term often used to obscure capital flight. Sponsored Considering this, he demanded that Base market the bridge honestly as a competitive tactic rather than a cooperative venture. “Ethereum L2s have to do the bs alignment dance because any activity on the L2 takes away from the ethereum L1 but you can’t be honest about it. So it reeks of bullshit,” Yakovenko said. Solana Foundation executives Vibhu Norby and Akshay BD had previously criticized the bridge, saying Base bypassed Solana’s technical and marketing teams entirely. They also alleged that the exchange-backed network launched the product without a single Solana launch partner.… The post Solana and Base Network Clash Over New Bridge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko struck at the core of Coinbase’s Base expansion strategy this weekend, dismissing the Ethereum layer-2 network’s new bridge as an “alignment bullshit.” In a sharp rebuke of Base lead Jesse Pollak, Yakovenko argued that cross-chain bridges are rarely neutral infrastructure. He said they act as vectors for value capture, deciding where fees settle and which ecosystem benefits. Sponsored Solana Rejects Base’s ‘Alignment’ Message Yakovenko contended that Base applications must migrate their computation to Solana so that transaction fees and economic activity accrue to Solana validators. “Migrate base apps to Solana so they execute on Solana, and the transactions are linearized by Solana staked block producers. That would be good for Solana developers. Otherwise, it’s alignment bullshit,” he said. The dispute ignited after Pollak announced the integration last week, framing it as a “bidirectional” tool to unlock shared liquidity. “We built this as a two-way bridge. The whole point is to unlock movement both ways because we are hearing from Solana teams that they want access to Base, and from Base teams that they want access to Solana. We want to make that possible,” Pollak stressed. However, Yakovenko rejected this premise, warning that “alignment” is a marketing term often used to obscure capital flight. Sponsored Considering this, he demanded that Base market the bridge honestly as a competitive tactic rather than a cooperative venture. “Ethereum L2s have to do the bs alignment dance because any activity on the L2 takes away from the ethereum L1 but you can’t be honest about it. So it reeks of bullshit,” Yakovenko said. Solana Foundation executives Vibhu Norby and Akshay BD had previously criticized the bridge, saying Base bypassed Solana’s technical and marketing teams entirely. They also alleged that the exchange-backed network launched the product without a single Solana launch partner.…

Solana and Base Network Clash Over New Bridge

2025/12/07 20:57

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko struck at the core of Coinbase’s Base expansion strategy this weekend, dismissing the Ethereum layer-2 network’s new bridge as an “alignment bullshit.”

In a sharp rebuke of Base lead Jesse Pollak, Yakovenko argued that cross-chain bridges are rarely neutral infrastructure. He said they act as vectors for value capture, deciding where fees settle and which ecosystem benefits.

Sponsored

Solana Rejects Base’s ‘Alignment’ Message

Yakovenko contended that Base applications must migrate their computation to Solana so that transaction fees and economic activity accrue to Solana validators.

The dispute ignited after Pollak announced the integration last week, framing it as a “bidirectional” tool to unlock shared liquidity.

However, Yakovenko rejected this premise, warning that “alignment” is a marketing term often used to obscure capital flight.

Sponsored

Considering this, he demanded that Base market the bridge honestly as a competitive tactic rather than a cooperative venture.

Solana Foundation executives Vibhu Norby and Akshay BD had previously criticized the bridge, saying Base bypassed Solana’s technical and marketing teams entirely.

They also alleged that the exchange-backed network launched the product without a single Solana launch partner.

At the same time, they cited private communications where Base leadership allegedly discussed “flipping” Solana as proof of hostile intent.

Sponsored

However, Pollak defended the initiative, claiming his team spent nine months building the connection to satisfy developer demand on both sides.

He attributed the friction to a communication breakdown and insisted that the bridge allows assets to flow freely wherever opportunities exist.

Sponsored

However, market observers see a darker pattern.

NFT historian Leonidas noted that Base employed similar “alignment propaganda” on Ethereum in 2023, extracting developer mindshare before pivoting to its own native economy.

Solana and Base have become two of the fastest-growing blockchain networks, competing directly for assets, liquidity, and developer activity.

Together, they hold nearly $20 billion in locked value. Solana accounts for about $12 billion, while Base holds roughly $6 billion, according to DeFiLlama data.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/solana-and-base-clash-over-new-bridge/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52