An audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation shows the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract, An audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation shows the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract,

Auditors flag P290-M Clark air traffic control tower project delays, cost overruns

2025/12/12 09:14

MANILA, Philippines – State auditors flagged the P290.3-million New Clark Air Traffic Control Tower project, awarded in January 2021 and expected to be completed within a year, saying it remains unfinished with no target turnover date.

The 2024 audit report on the Clark International Airport Corporation (CIAC) showed the project has been extended six times, adding 930 days to the original 365-day contract, but was only 91% complete as of 2024. Costs had also risen 22% to P354.41 million.

Auditors attributed the delays to weak procurement planning, poor project monitoring and possible shortcomings in the contractor’s capacity. They also noted the project broke ground without the required building, electronic, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and sanitary permits from the Clark Development Corporation, the regulator for the Clark Freeport Zone.

Auditors stressed that building permits are mandatory under the National Building Code, with violations carrying fines of up to P20,000 or jail terms of up to two years.

“It was only on April 29, 2024 that CIAC was able to secure the necessary permits from the CDC. The absence of necessary permits during the construction period raises serious concerns regarding regulatory compliance, project authorization, and risk management,” the report read in part.

Auditors said the missing permits reflected poorly on the contractor’s ability to plan and questioned why construction continued for years without them.

“Securing permits is a fundamental requirement in the construction industry, and failure to do so casts doubt on the contractor’s capability to manage regulatory requirements effectively. This oversight not only hindered the project’s progress but also highlighted deficiencies in due diligence and adherence to standard construction protocols,” the report added.

State auditors said CIAC management failed to intervene early, allowing procedural violations to persist.

The contractor sought a suspension of the height clearance limit on March 17, 2022 – two months after the original January 2022 completion date – after the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) denied permits for the tower and tower crane for exceeding allowable height. The control tower’s proposed top elevation was 228.81 meters, compared with CAAP’s 192-meter limit, a 36.81-meter excess.

The report noted that the approval of the Final Aeronautical Study and the redesign of the 4-Instrument Flight Procedures remained pending.

With shortening the tower out of the question, CAAP required an aeronautical study for a height clearance exemption. COA said the study assessed deviations from aerodrome standards, proposed safety measures, and recommended procedures to offset the deviation.

The contractor commissioned an international firm in 2023 to conduct the three-month study, costing P3.9 million. A portion of the findings stressed that “considering the existing defenses and proposed mitigation measures, the risks associated with the new control tower in its final situation are deemed acceptable.”

The results, along with a new Height Clearance Permit application, were submitted to CAAP on October 11, 2023. As of December 31, 2024, the permit had not been issued.

“Further verification revealed that CAAP requires additional documentation to support the aeronautical study report,” the audit showed.

Auditors also found the installed elevators did not match the specified brand in the paid progress billings. While the project listed a German-made Schneider elevator, inspection revealed a different brand.

They said, “According to the approved Bill of Quantities, the contracted brand was Schneider, a German brand. However, during an inspection conducted on March 20, 2025, the installed elevator was identified as Global Fuji, a Chinese brand. A review of records confirmed that this substitution was approved by the then president and chief executive officer of CIAC.” – Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52