The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a mixed ruling on Apple’s appeal of a contempt order, delivering a “fresh loss” to Apple in some respects whileThe 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a mixed ruling on Apple’s appeal of a contempt order, delivering a “fresh loss” to Apple in some respects while

Court hands Apple fresh loss in Epic App Store appeal

2025/12/12 12:44

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a mixed ruling on Apple’s appeal of a contempt order, delivering a “fresh loss” to Apple in some respects while at the same time granting partial relief. 

Apple was held in contempt by Judge Gonzalez Rogers who tagged its actions a “willful violation” and a “cover-up” to preserve billions in revenue. 

The federal appeals court sided with Epic Games Inc. in its long-running dispute with Apple Inc., by upholding a lower-court contempt ruling against the company  and directing a judge to decide what commission the company is allowed to charge developers on transactions that occur outside of the App Store.

Apple and Epic Games continue legal bout

In the 54-page ruling on Thursday, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco found Apple guilty of violating a lower court’s injunction by imposing a 27% fee on transactions and affirmed US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ decision to hold the company in contempt. 

At the same time, the three-judge panel urged Gonzalez Rogers to reconsider what commission Apple can charge developers for use of its intellectual property.

“Apple is entitled to some compensation for the use of its intellectual property that is directly used in permitting Epic and others to consummate linked-out purchases,” the court claims.

It is the latest episode in the feud between Apple and Epic which has continued for more than five years with Epic accusing Apple of illegally blocking competition to its App Store. 

Rogers’ ruling in April accused Apple of deliberately flouting her 2021 order to allow developers to direct consumers to cheaper payment options online. Apple enjoys a 15% to 30% cut of most in-app purchases, a fact that has long angered developers and one Apple sought to protect by reducing the commission it charges by 3% from 30% for purchases made outside the App Store within seven days of clicking a link. 

Epic had complained about the new 27% commission, claiming it flouted the earlier injunction and urged the court to hold Apple in contempt which it ultimately did. Apple’s appeal argued that the new order had improperly expanded on the original injunction. 

Of course, the appeals court order rejected Apple’s arguments that the injunction should not have applied beyond Epic Games itself.

Fortnite is reinstated in the US Google Play Store 

The win against Apple comes just as Epic Games’ popular battle royale, Fortnite, secured a return to the U.S. Google Play Store following a court order.

“Fortnite is back on the Google Play Store in the U.S. following Google’s compliance with the U.S. District Court’s injunction. We’re continuing to work with Google to seek court approval of our settlement. Stay tuned for news of Fortnite’s return to Google Play to the rest of the world,” an official announcement shared via Epic’s newsroom read

This comes after the game maker settled its five-year legal battle with the tech giant, which stemmed from a dispute around the percentage of in-app purchase sales that app developers were required to share with the platforms. 

Apple and Google removed the game from their respective app stores in 2020 because Epic Games launched a version of the Fortnite game that routed around the existing in-app payment systems on iOS and Android devices. 

In response, Epic Games filed antitrust lawsuits against both companies.

For Apple, the court’s ruling rejected the idea that it was a monopolist but acknowledged that Apple needed to allow developers to point to other payment mechanisms if they so decided. Apple has been contesting the specific terms of that agreement, which were partially overturned by the recent appeals court ruling that called some of the restrictions “overbroad.”

Unlike Apple, Google Play Store lost its court battle with the game developer, where it was found guilty of having engaged in anticompetitive behavior, which has led to the drafting of a new agreement, which forces Google to allow app developers to point to alternative payment mechanisms and also caps the fees Google could charge.

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has hailed the ruling as a “comprehensive solution” that doubles down on Android’s reputation as an open platform.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37