South Korea’s top financial regulator has missed a government deadline as South Korea’s leadership battles to legalize stablecoins.Earlier this month, the rulingSouth Korea’s top financial regulator has missed a government deadline as South Korea’s leadership battles to legalize stablecoins.Earlier this month, the ruling

Stablecoin uncertainty continues as South Korean regulator misses government deadline

2025/12/14 20:48

South Korea’s top financial regulator has missed a government deadline as South Korea’s leadership battles to legalize stablecoins.

Earlier this month, the ruling Democratic Party called upon ministries and the Financial Services Commission, or FSC, to submit a regulation bill for won-pegged stablecoins by December 10.

The ruling party has committed to introducing a bill by the end of January 2026, in line with manifesto promises from President Lee Jae-myung.

But the FSC, the South Korean media outlet Newsis reported, says that it will instead “soon make public” the terms of a bill tentatively titled the Basic Digital Asset Act.

“We were unable to submit a proposal within the requested timeframe,” a FSC spokesperson told reporters. “The simple fact is that the FSC needed more time to coordinate its position with the relevant agencies.”

Time is running out for the Democratic Party, which has made repeated promises about stablecoin regulations, with the private sector continuing its long wait for permission to launch KRW-pegged tokens.

At present, all forms of cryptocurrency and stablecoin issuance remain illegal on South Korean territory. But Seoul thinks that allowing firms to issue stablecoins will help them catch up with their rivals in the US and Japan.

“The ruling party [has effectively committed] to publishing a consolidated bill in January next year,” Newsis wrote. “Considering this fact, the FSC’s proposal is expected to be made public as before the end of this month or early next month at the latest.”

The FSC says that instead of rushing to meet the party’s deadline, it has instead decided to announce its proposal “simultaneously” with the bill’s submission to the National Assembly.

The spokesperson explained that this was part of the FSC’s attempt “to protect the public’s right to know” about the matter.

However, the FSC’s comments come at a time of considerable tension between the government and the Bank of Korea, or BOK.

The BOK has expressed vociferous doubts about Lee’s plans, claiming that letting big tech firms issue their own coins will undermine its power and control over monetary policy. The government has reacted with anger to the BOK’s stance.

The FSC has found itself in the middle of this struggle. One proposed compromise, reportedly endorsed by the BOK, would involve a law that stipulates that only consortia where domestic banks have a 51% or higher stake can issue stablecoins.

The regulator has taken issue with this line of reasoning, citing a lack of global precedents for bank-led stablecoin issuance.

The FSC has pointed to the EU and Japan, noting that the vast bulk of stablecoin issuers in these two jurisdictions are fintech companies.

The BOK also wants the power of veto in all stablecoin issuance approval decisions. And it wants regulatory powers, including the ability to conduct spot checks of issuers.

However, the FSC is reluctant to agree. The regulator said that its own approval should suffice, and added that the BOK does not need any such powers.

Tim Alper is a news correspondent at DL News. Got a tip? Email at [email protected].

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit

The post Shytoshi Kusama Addresses $2.4 Million Shibarium Bridge Exploit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The lead developer of Shiba Inu, Shytoshi Kusama, has publicly addressed the Shibarium bridge exploit that occurred recently, draining $2.4 million from the network. After days of speculation about his involvement in managing the crisis, the project leader broke his silence. Kusama emphasized that a special “war room” has been set up to restore stolen finances and enhance network security. The statement is his first official words since the bridge compromise occurred. “Although I am focusing on AI initiatives to benefit all our tokens, I remain with the developers and leadership in the war room,” Kusama posted on social media platform X. He dismissed claims that he had distanced himself from the project as “utterly preposterous.” The developer said that the reason behind his silence at first was strategic. Before he could make any statements publicly, he must have taken time to evaluate what he termed a complex and deep situation properly. Kusama also vowed to provide further updates in the official Shiba Inu channels as the team comes up with long-term solutions. As highlighted in our previous article, targeted Shibarium’s bridge infrastructure through a sophisticated attack vector. Hackers gained unauthorized access to validator signing keys, compromising the network’s security framework. The hackers executed a flash loan to acquire 4.6 million BONE ShibaSwap tokens. The validator power on the network was majority held by them after this purchase. They were able to transfer assets out of Shibarium with this control. The response of Shibarium developers was timely to limit the breach. They instantly halted all validator functions in order to avoid additional exploitation. The team proceeded to deposit the assets under staking in a multisig hardware wallet that is secure. External security companies were involved in the investigation effort. Hexens, Seal 911, and PeckShield are collaborating with internal developers to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:46