TLDR Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator is suing Jump Trading for $4 billion in damages over the 2022 TerraUSD collapse Jump Trading allegedly entered secretTLDR Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator is suing Jump Trading for $4 billion in damages over the 2022 TerraUSD collapse Jump Trading allegedly entered secret

Terraform Labs Sues Jump Trading for $4 Billion Over TerraUSD Collapse

TLDR

  • Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy administrator is suing Jump Trading for $4 billion in damages over the 2022 TerraUSD collapse
  • Jump Trading allegedly entered secret agreements with Terraform Labs starting in 2019 to purchase Luna tokens below market value
  • The lawsuit claims Jump helped prop up TerraUSD’s dollar peg in May 2021 but misled the public about why it recovered
  • Jump allegedly profited around $1 billion from selling Luna tokens after the ecosystem collapsed
  • Do Kwon was sentenced to 15 years in prison last week after pleading guilty to criminal charges

Todd Snyder, the court-appointed administrator handling Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy, filed a lawsuit seeking $4 billion in damages from Jump Trading. The suit names the high-speed trading firm along with co-founder William DiSomma and former crypto business president Kanav Kariya.

The lawsuit centers on the 2022 collapse of TerraUSD and Luna, which wiped out $40 billion in value. Terraform Labs filed for bankruptcy in January 2024 and later agreed to pay the Securities and Exchange Commission $4.5 billion in settlements.

Secret Agreements Dating Back to 2019

According to the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Jump Trading and Terraform Labs entered into undisclosed agreements starting in 2019. These deals allowed Jump to purchase millions of Luna tokens at prices far below market rates.

One agreement let Jump acquire Luna tokens for 40 cents each when the market price exceeded $110 per token. The lawsuit claims these arrangements eventually resulted in billions of dollars in gains for Jump.

Jump also entered what the suit calls a “gentlemen’s agreement” to help maintain TerraUSD’s peg to the dollar. The trading firm wanted to keep this arrangement secret to avoid regulatory scrutiny, according to court documents.

In May 2021, TerraUSD temporarily lost its dollar peg. Jump allegedly stepped in to support the stablecoin through purchases that restored its value.

The lawsuit claims Jump then misled the public by saying TerraUSD recovered because its algorithm worked. In reality, Jump’s purchases restored the peg, not the algorithmic mechanism as stated publicly.

After this incident exposed weaknesses in TerraUSD’s design, Jump negotiated to remove vesting requirements from its contracts. This allowed the trading firm to receive monthly Luna token installments and sell them immediately without lockup periods.

The Final Collapse

The May 2021 depeg led to the creation of Luna Foundation Guard. This reserve held bitcoin and other crypto assets to protect TerraUSD from future depegs.

When TerraUSD depegged again in May 2022, the foundation transferred nearly 50,000 bitcoin to Jump. The lawsuit states this transfer happened without any written agreement about how the bitcoin would be used.

The suit also alleges DiSomma contacted other crypto trading firms to seek bailout funding. Some aggressive trading firms used this information to trade against TerraUSD and Luna, which allegedly hastened Terraform’s downfall.

Jump made approximately $1 billion in profit by selling Luna, according to previous SEC court filings. So far, only about $300 million in assets has been recovered to compensate creditors.

In December 2024, Tai Mo Shan, a Jump Trading unit, paid $123 million to settle an SEC investigation into its dealings with Kwon and Terraform. When questioned by the SEC, both Kariya and DiSomma invoked their Fifth Amendment rights hundreds of times, according to the lawsuit. Kariya left Jump in 2024.

Kwon was sentenced to 15 years in prison last week after pleading guilty to two criminal counts in August.

The post Terraform Labs Sues Jump Trading for $4 Billion Over TerraUSD Collapse appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Jump Tom Logo
Jump Tom Price(JUMP)
$0,000000000000000000000001
$0,000000000000000000000001$0,000000000000000000000001
%0,00
USD
Jump Tom (JUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

Building a DEXScreener Clone: A Step-by-Step Guide

DEX Screener is used by crypto traders who need access to on-chain data like trading volumes, liquidity, and token prices. This information allows them to analyze trends, monitor new listings, and make informed investment decisions. In this tutorial, I will build a DEXScreener clone from scratch, covering everything from the initial design to a functional app. We will use Streamlit, a Python framework for building full-stack apps.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 15:05
Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

Which DOGE? Musk's Cryptic Post Explodes Confusion

A viral chart documenting a sharp decline in U.S. federal employment during President Trump's second term has sparked unexpected confusion in cryptocurrency markets
Share
Coinstats2025/12/20 01:13
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00